PokerStars Game #14446813401: Hold'em No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2008/01/09 - 22:24:00 (ET)
Table 'Maria II' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($28.75 in chips)
Seat 2: ARTICCAT800 ($37.25 in chips)
Seat 3: slew1970 ($15.85 in chips)
Seat 4: djlash ($28.15 in chips)
Seat 5: Jenks69 ($26.10 in chips)
Seat 6: keila1 ($16.85 in chips)
Hero : posts small blind $0.10
ARTICCAT800: posts big blind $0.25
Holecards Dealt to Hero
slew1970: folds
djlash: raises $1 to $1.25
Jenks69: folds
keila1: folds
Hero : raises $2.50 to $3.75
ARTICCAT800: folds
djlash: raises $24.40 to $28.15 and is all-in
Hero : folds
djlash collected $7.75 from pot
djlash: doesn't show hand
Summary Total pot $7.75 | Rake $0
Seat 1: Hero (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: ARTICCAT800 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: slew1970 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: djlash collected ($7.75)
Seat 5: Jenks69 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: keila1 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
twotimesopt United States. Jan 09 2008 21:44. Posts 2393
folding is ALWAYS 0 EV. think about why this is true
also, PLAN YOUR HANDS. if this guys a maniac, he's gonna 4bet-shove a wide range here, so if we're 3betting it HAS to be to insta-call a shove. this is a viable option. you can also just flat here and take a flop. what i'm getting at is that 3bet/folding here with TT sucks against a maniac
quit tryin to be a repo man - definitely -EV and negative expectancy - AvidGambler
