Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 139313
Submitted by : Rhaegar
PokerStars Game #8192702038: Hold'em No Limit ($5/$10) - 2007/01/30 - 03:33:53 (ET)
Table 'Merapi II' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: dim--tix ($1122 in chips)
Seat 2: Gith ($2248 in chips)
Seat 3: aejones ($1584 in chips)
Seat 4: Rhaegar7 ($1680 in chips)
Seat 5: cts687 ($990 in chips)
Seat 6: colson10 ($1240 in chips)
cts687: posts small blind $5
colson10: posts big blind $10
Holecards
Dealt to Rhaegar7  
dim--tix: folds
Gith: raises $30 to $40
aejones: folds
Rhaegar7: calls $40
cts687: folds
colson10: folds
Flop (Pot : $95)
  
Gith: bets $70
Rhaegar7: raises $150 to $220
Gith: calls $150
Turn (Pot : $535)
Gith: checks
Rhaegar7: bets $400
Gith: calls $400
River (Pot : $1335)
Gith: checks
Rhaegar7: bets $1020 and is all-in
Gith: calls $1020
Showdown
Rhaegar7: shows (a straight, Ten to Ace)
Gith: shows   (a flush, Ace high)
Gith collected $3372 from pot
Summary
Total pot $3375 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: dim--tix folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: Gith showed and won ($3372) with a flush, Ace high
Seat 3: aejones folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: Rhaegar7 (button) showed and lost with a straight, Ten to Ace
Seat 5: cts687 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: colson10 (big blind) folded before Flop
 |
Comments |
 |
1
 |
Rhaegar  Bulgaria. Jan 30 2007 01:36. Posts 2586 | | |
Ugh, should I have checked behind? Funny, I thought I was value betting thin, bleh.. He almost folded... |
|
| One very suspicious player | |
|
| 1
 |
Stim_Abuser United States. Jan 30 2007 02:18. Posts 7499 | | |
thats a really hard call for anything that doesnt beat you. you might be tired and playing bad. break time? |
|
| Hey Im slinging mad volume and fat stackin benjies I dont got time for spellin n shit - skinny pete | |
|
| 1
|
Rhaegar Bulgaria. Jan 30 2007 10:22. Posts 2586 | | |
Yeah, but I thought everything that has me beat check raises turn all in and a flush draw has folded by now. And I was right... I think that hell have AT AK here most often.
Another thing that lead me to believe that was that he took some time on flop, but snap called turn. I think its logical to assume he was wondering if he should stay with 1 pair on flop, but with trips on turn was more likely to be ahead and had more outs. Its really a rare case for him to have exactly this hand and even then he played it quite weird. |
|
| One very suspicious player | |
|
| |
|
