1
 |
El_Tanque United States. Mar 07 2011 19:46. Posts 360 | | |
I am ready to start grinding again. Whats the best site to start on?
Also, if anyone wants to make $1, stake me $10, once I get to $20, I'll send $11. I'm an RA and have to work the front desk for 6 hours tonight, so i'd like to play tonight, and I can't send money using debit card b/c my bank won't let me.
If you can help let me know!!
Thanks
EDIT!!!
If i do this, how important is the first time bonus? I've only played on cake and ps.
Also, nvm on the $10 stake, i was able to use the instacheck or w/e. Thought it would take a week or something!!! Thanks tho!
|
|
| | Last edit: 08/03/2011 00:06 |
|
|
1
 |
egood United States. Mar 07 2011 19:50. Posts 1883 | | |
i'd sign up for ftp with a rakeback account. |
|
|
1
|
El_Tanque United States. Mar 07 2011 20:04. Posts 360 | | |
| | On March 07 2011 18:50 egood wrote:
i'd sign up for ftp with a rakeback account. |
thanks what i was thinking. Thanks! |
|
|
1
 |
RoyCe 4otZ United States. Mar 07 2011 21:51. Posts 147 | | |
yea def ftp for micro/small stakes once you get enough move to poker stars |
|
| brown n blue, i feel good i just want to breathe. | |
|
|
1
|
boreHM Netherlands. Mar 08 2011 04:25. Posts 1595 | | |
| | On March 07 2011 20:51 RoyCe 4otZ wrote:
yea def ftp for micro/small stakes once you get enough move to poker stars |
why move? |
|
|
1
 |
Senti Poland. Mar 08 2011 07:49. Posts 57 | | |
AFAIK Stars is better than FTP for super micro stakes because it doesn't rake pots <1$, but I might be wrong |
|
|
1
| |
the consensus is that rake for pokerstars is better/smaller for NL10 and lower compared with FTP with rakeback, and FTP w/rakeback is better at NL25, not sure about the rest. |
|
|
|
