1
 |
AfterLife New Zealand. Nov 18 2010 03:23. Posts 62 | | |
I have switched to 6 max because its easier you can play more hands per hour and they players are twice as bad.
So this are my overall results.
My next update is gonna contain a lot more information then this one , I m gonna post some hands and etc...
Ty,
Alex
|
|
|
1
 |
K40Cheddar United States. Nov 18 2010 03:31. Posts 2202 | | |
solid man keep getting those hands in and you'll be at NL 5 soon |
| |
|
|
1
| | |
|
| shoving here as a bluff at 50NL is like explaning calcalus to a 6 month old cat wtf are you thinking - TalentedTom | |
|
|
1
|
AfterLife New Zealand. Nov 18 2010 05:00. Posts 62 | | |
ty guys, hopefully i will be there soon, and the , is there a huge diff between nl2 and nl5 ? |
|
|
1
|
AfterLife New Zealand. Nov 18 2010 05:06. Posts 62 | | |
i think taht i mite move to Ipoker and play HU , thy have micro stakes HU but i dunnno if its a good idea . |
|
|
1
 |
adeny Norway. Nov 18 2010 06:44. Posts 23 | | |
Is 6 max really that much easier than 9? What are the main differences? |
|
|
1
 |
Surprise United States. Nov 18 2010 07:43. Posts 275 | | |
I've found 6 max nl5 is way easier than fr nl5 @ stars, but I can't speak for other stakes. |
|
| the games you own at, end up owning you | |
|
|
1
 |
Zuries United Kingdom. Nov 18 2010 07:52. Posts 120 | | |
there's no difference at all between nl2 and nl5. |
|
|
1
|
Gigabeef United Kingdom. Nov 18 2010 08:55. Posts 111 | | |
| | On November 18 2010 06:52 Zuries wrote:
there's no difference at all between nl2 and nl5. |
+1, it just takes a bit of time to get used to larger bets because it will be your first move up in stakes. Btw once you move up, if you get some runbad/feel pressured there's no shame in moving back to nl2 for a bit to regain confidence even if you are fully rolled for nl5. |
|
|
1
|
K40Cheddar United States. Nov 18 2010 10:50. Posts 2202 | | |
Not really a significant jump from 2 to 5. The bigger jump is from 5 to 10. |
| |
|
|
|
