1
 |
gawdawaful   Canada. Jul 29 2008 05:39. Posts 9013 | | | |
|
| Im only good at poker when I run good | Last edit: 24/09/2021 00:10 |
|
|
1
 |
Oly   United Kingdom. Jul 29 2008 05:43. Posts 3585 | | | |
|
| Researchers used brain scans to show that when straight men looked at pictures of women in bikinis, areas of the brain that normally light up in anticipation of using tools, like spanners and screwdrivers, were activated. | |
|
|
1
 |
gawdawaful   Canada. Jul 29 2008 05:45. Posts 9013 | | |
I also just realize I can keep reading beyond his examples durr
looks like I'll be up a bit longer to read through this and that post. Thanks! |
|
| Im only good at poker when I run good | |
|
|
1
 |
gawdawaful   Canada. Jul 29 2008 05:57. Posts 9013 | | |
I like this equation better, easier to understand
| | EV = 2x + (1-x){(1/3 * 6) + (2/3 * (-4))}
=> EV = 2x + (1-x)(6/3 - 8/3)
=> EV = 2x + (1-x) * (-2/3)
I thought it would be something like: 1/3 of the time you draw out and win 6 , 2/3 you don't and lose 4, hence the formula I wrote down.
So the results are the same, I just don't understand the way you calculate it... |
armed with this, I shall try and continue my original example.
My example/math:
EV = 2x + (1-x){(9/44*116) + (35/44)*(-87)}
EV = 2x + (1-x){(261/11) + (-3045/44)}
EV = 2x + (1-x)(-1989/44)
EV = 2x + (-1989/44 + 1989/44x)
1989/44 = 2077/44x
1989=2077x
x = 0.957
So 95.7% time to be 0EV??
That cant be right.. can it? |
|
| Im only good at poker when I run good | |
|
|
1
 |
gawdawaful   Canada. Jul 29 2008 05:58. Posts 9013 | | | |
|
| Im only good at poker when I run good | Last edit: 29/07/2008 05:59 |
|
|
4
 |
Baalim   Mexico. Jul 29 2008 06:24. Posts 34305 | | | |
|
| Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
1
 |
Silver_nz   New Zealand. Jul 29 2008 06:51. Posts 5647 | | |
I always do this by looking at how much you will lose when called first
200bb total pot, you win 20.5% of the time = 41bb won long run if he always calls. so long run you lose -87bb+41bb = -46bb if he calls
then you win 50bb if he folds, so if x is % of times he folds
(x)50bb - ( 1- x )46bb = 0 [eq1]
solve for x
..but that takes work so I like to just plug in random %'s for x and see how it comes out
eg if he folds 50% eq1 = 25bb - 23bb = 2bb profit
if he folds 40% calls 60% eq1 = 20bb - 27.6bb = -7.6bb loss
so you really want him to be folding at least 50% of the time. |
|
| | Last edit: 29/07/2008 06:57 |
|
|
1
 |
ggplz   Sweden. Jul 29 2008 06:54. Posts 16784 | | |
looked up some old posts cuz i was curious myself and found this way of working it out:
EV (fold) = 50$
EV(call) = (0.205 * 200) - 87 = -46
p(fold) = EV(call) / [ EV(call) - EV(fold) ]
p(fold) = -46 / [-46 - 50] = -46/-96 or 47.92%
so u need him to fold like 47.92% of the time for it to be profitable |
|
| if poker is dangerous to them i would rank sports betting as a Kodiak grizzly bear who smells blood after you just threw a javelin into his cub - RaiNKhAN | Last edit: 29/07/2008 08:20 |
|
|
1
 |
Repusz   Hungary. Jul 29 2008 09:30. Posts 1033 | | |
I haven't read through all the stuff, but in fail #2, x means the % he folds and thus you win 2, 1-x is the % you have to showdown your hand where you win 1/3 of the time 10 (this is the pot size, 2+4+4) minus your investment (4)
hope this helps if you haven't solved the problem yet |
|
|
1
 |
Repusz   Hungary. Jul 29 2008 09:33. Posts 1033 | | |
NM I misread the op apparently |
|
| | Last edit: 29/07/2008 10:39 |
|
|
1
 |
nixxxbg   Bulgaria. Jul 29 2008 10:34. Posts 436 | | |
Let x be the % of the time he folds.
When he folds (x % of the time) we insta win the pot (50bb). ==> x*(50bb)
When he calls (1-x % of the time), 20.5% of the time we win the pot (50bb) and his stack (66bb) and the other 79.5% we lose our stack (87bb) ==> (1-x)*((0.205*(116bb) - 0.795*(87bb))
Then:
EV(jam) = 0 = x*(50bb) + (1-x)*(0.205*(116bb) - 0.795*(87bb))
EV(jam) = 0 = x*(50bb) - (1-x)*(45.385bb)
EV(jam) = 0 = x*(95.385bb) - 45.385bb
==> x = 45.385/95.385 = 0.4758 = 47.58%
|
|
|
|