1
 |
Jamie217 Canada. Feb 01 2013 13:49. Posts 4351 | | |
At the end of the year I had to withdraw a fair amount of my BR for real life shit, so that left me with enough to grind 100nlzoom for Jan. 100zoom is incredibly soft and I started mixing in 200zoom a bit but kept running bad over short samples with a small roll so I kept having to stick to 100. Volume wise I did alright, mostly 4 tabling so 80k hands is ok but Feb is going to be a lot worse for volume
Going to Florida for a golf trip on Monday for a week and then Cuba on the 20th with a bunch of friends to an all inclusive resort so Im pretty pumped about all of that. Essentially it means I will only be playing poker for 12-14 days of the month though so hopefully 30k/40k hands would be nice but we'll see.
These stats are from my desktop and laptop so thats why there is a split
Desktop:
Laptop:
Superbowl on Sunday as well, everyone seems to be on San Fran so I might put some money on Balt....Whats everyone think?
|
|
|
1
 |
Shenny Canada. Feb 01 2013 15:15. Posts 1514 | | | |
|
|
1
|
GoTuNk Chile. Feb 01 2013 16:47. Posts 2860 | | |
your 1/2 zoom shots look like my nl50 shots ;( |
|
|
1
 |
bigredhoss Cook Islands. Feb 01 2013 17:30. Posts 8648 | | |
sick jealous of cuba trip
wrt super bowl: i think there was a lot of value on ravens when the lines opened with them +5.5, but they pretty quickly dropped to 4 and now 3.5. i think lines seem pretty efficient now (disclaimer: i don't really know what i'm talking about, but i've run pretty good at sportsbetting over a small sample!)
but the theory i've heard that makes the most sense to me is that 49ers will get a lot of late "square"/public money on them, so if you're betting on the ravens it's best to wait since any line movement is most likely to go back that way. (again i dont really know tho) i'm betting 49ers b/c i'm a fan :S |
| |
|
|
1
 |
sweetbread Czech Republic. Feb 01 2013 19:47. Posts 159 | | |
Ravens plus 4 or better seems okay. Also most of the rushing props under (Gore, Rice, Kap) are getting hit pretty heavy from what I can see offshore.
|
|
|
1
|
Jamie217 Canada. Feb 01 2013 21:00. Posts 4351 | | |
| | On February 01 2013 16:30 bigredhoss wrote:
sick jealous of cuba trip
wrt super bowl: i think there was a lot of value on ravens when the lines opened with them +5.5, but they pretty quickly dropped to 4 and now 3.5. i think lines seem pretty efficient now (disclaimer: i don't really know what i'm talking about, but i've run pretty good at sportsbetting over a small sample!)
but the theory i've heard that makes the most sense to me is that 49ers will get a lot of late "square"/public money on them, so if you're betting on the ravens it's best to wait since any line movement is most likely to go back that way. (again i dont really know tho) i'm betting 49ers b/c i'm a fan :S |
Yeah I definitely think most of the public money will be on the 49ers, if I can grab +4.5 I think I will do that for sure
And yeah Ive never been to an all-inclusive before so Im pretty pumped... Ill throw up some pics when I get back |
|
|
1
 |
Raid United States. Feb 02 2013 02:50. Posts 318 | | |
| | On February 01 2013 18:47 sweetbread wrote:
Ravens plus 4 or better seems okay. Also most of the rushing props under (Gore, Rice, Kap) are getting hit pretty heavy from what I can see offshore.
|
Niners are 5-1 all time in games where Jerome Boger is the lead official, and they've won the last four in a row. Coincidence? |
|
| | Last edit: 02/02/2013 02:53 |
|
|
1
| |
nice. i will have to try zoom again. for some reason my results have always been bad there. |
|
| there are no facts only interpretations | |
|
|
|
