Poker Assistant - Page 2

On February 02 2010 19:27 tcmux wrote: Show nested quote + On February 02 2010 19:06 Bigbobm wrote: Why would you even consider doing this? I can't see you charging more than $15 an hour for this service, so why not just grind yourself? I understand it's risk free, but you take a massive hit here being risk averse. because getting ~1.5k risk free from working gameselecting/rakeback is pretty good.

How does rakeback have anything to do with this?

Doesn't most people have 2 screens, can't u just have the lobby on the right one, and each time ur not in a hand, klick on it, won't it notify where there are fishes anyway?

*confused*

I was actually thinking about paying someone to do this lately to be honest w/ you. Your request for 24/hr is wayyyy too high tho.

On February 02 2010 19:06 Bigbobm wrote: Why would you even consider doing this? I can't see you charging more than $15 an hour for this service, so why not just grind yourself? I understand it's risk free, but you take a massive hit here being risk averse.

This is great for someone who kinda knows the game but cant get out there and really earn. 0 stress, involved w/ game, easy money. Browse games, chill out, get paid. Beats any other college job.

On February 02 2010 21:13 Maynard! wrote: I was actually thinking about paying someone to do this lately to be honest w/ you. Your request for 24/hr is wayyyy too high tho.

ill do it for half that.

GTFO

Am I the only one who thinks that spotting a fish playing above NL400, where there aren't that many tables, is super easy? In addition, you get someone yammering in your ear every 5 sec, "hey take this table, hey take that table!" I'd rather just play and look through the table list every few minutes, as I do now. I really can't see someone doing so much more than I do now as to raise my hourly rate by $15.

Additionally, anyone willing to work 20 hours for $15/hour either plays micro stakes or is a really bad player. You get more money just from rakeback 8-tabling NL200, and probably almost that much 8-tabling NL100. I would not want to involve a person that incompetent in any part of my poker-playing process, much less pay them money for it.

On February 02 2010 22:58 phexac wrote: Am I the only one who thinks that spotting a fish playing above NL400, where there aren't that many tables, is super easy? In addition, you get someone yammering in your ear every 5 sec, "hey take this table, hey take that table!" I'd rather just play and look through the table list every few minutes, as I do now. I really can't see someone doing so much more than I do now as to raise my hourly rate by $15. Additionally, anyone willing to work 20 hours for $15/hour either plays micro stakes or is a really bad player. You get more money just from rakeback 8-tabling NL200, and probably almost that much 8-tabling NL100. I would not want to involve a person that incompetent in any part of my poker-playing process, much less pay them money for it.

Actually if you can manage 950 hands/hr at 100nl you get just under $19 an hr with 27% rb on ftp not including other bonuses etc. At nl200 you get just under $26

well, if i still had a dog i would hire you to take care of him