1
 |
rednalluk Sweden. Dec 02 2009 18:58. Posts 626 | | |
| | On December 02 2009 14:41 Night[Mare] wrote:
what? according to the graph he's a bloody luckbox and is losing on non-showdown pots |
That is PA's graph. (says vs Isildur on top) |
|
|
1
|
Fudyann Netherlands. Dec 03 2009 15:41. Posts 704 | | |
I don't understand poker at all but to me it's not necessarily a luckbox. If Isildur is paying off too much then you have the same graph and it's just a mistake from Isildur that causes it. Shoving into the nuts regularly is the same as paying off even if you win a non-showdown pot from time to time. |
|
|
1
 |
tiagoxdd Brasil. Dec 03 2009 17:43. Posts 96 | | |
| | On December 03 2009 14:41 Fudyann wrote:
I don't understand poker at all but to me it's not necessarily a luckbox. If Isildur is paying off too much then you have the same graph and it's just a mistake from Isildur that causes it. Shoving into the nuts regularly is the same as paying off even if you win a non-showdown pot from time to time. |
ok |
|
|
1
|
TheGuru Sweden. Dec 03 2009 17:45. Posts 532 | | |
| | On December 03 2009 14:41 Fudyann wrote:
I don't understand poker at all but to me it's not necessarily a luckbox. If Isildur is paying off too much then you have the same graph and it's just a mistake from Isildur that causes it. Shoving into the nuts regularly is the same as paying off even if you win a non-showdown pot from time to time. |
Quit at 6 words imo |
|
| There is no such thing as luck. There is only adequate or inadequate preparation to cope with a statistical universe. - Robert A. Heinlein (Time Enough for Love) | |
|
|
1
 |
palak United States. Dec 03 2009 18:04. Posts 4601 | | |
| | On December 03 2009 14:41 Fudyann wrote:
I don't understand poker at all but to me it's not necessarily a luckbox. If Isildur is paying off too much then you have the same graph and it's just a mistake from Isildur that causes it. Shoving into the nuts regularly is the same as paying off even if you win a non-showdown pot from time to time. |
we arn't saying luckbox because PA is down a fuckton w/o showdown. We are saying luckbox because PA is 2.5mil above ev. |
|
| dont tap the glass...im about ready to take a fucking hammer to the aquarium | |
|
|
1
 |
player999 Brasil. Dec 03 2009 18:36. Posts 7978 | | |
you guys dont expect anyone to actually have a winning redline vs isildur right? only way to beat him is with the other line (unless a huge monster would show up that would out-monkey isildur somehow zomg!) |
|
| Browsing through your hand histories makes me wonder that you might not be aware these games are possibly play money. Have you ever tried to cash out? - Kapol | |
|
|
4
 |
Baalim Mexico. Dec 03 2009 20:37. Posts 34312 | | |
| | On December 03 2009 16:45 TheGuru wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2009 14:41 Fudyann wrote:
I don't understand poker at all but to me it's not necessarily a luckbox. If Isildur is paying off too much then you have the same graph and it's just a mistake from Isildur that causes it. Shoving into the nuts regularly is the same as paying off even if you win a non-showdown pot from time to time. |
Quit at 6 words imo
|
|
|
| Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 855 Active, 3 Logged in - Time: 10:39
,
,
,
,