Libratus AI vs poker players - complete destruction over last few days - Page 2

damn jason is down 600k now, if he open folds he would do better

there is a guy in chat namdnasrm who said the bot has no preflop/flop solver and wants them to start shoving preflop/flops to about 80-90%. Saying the bot will solve to the nearest solve that he knows and it will map wrong ranges

I want to see libratus playing libratus

On January 25 2017 23:35 Highcard wrote: there is a guy in chat namdnasrm who said the bot has no preflop/flop solver and wants them to start shoving preflop/flops to about 80-90%. Saying the bot will solve to the nearest solve that he knows and it will map wrong ranges

Now this is how you exploit a bot, they exploited the last bot with overbets, trying to play bots straight is stupid, the point is to find the chink in the armor.

And Jason Les did also horrible the last time why was he invited again?

well from the University they want profish so they can say they beat pros. Easy to invite him again. He said yes obviously because it is the easiest money he can make. If I was the other people I would have voted him off before match started. Could be 1 of many reasons why Doug said no.

The entire point of this is to beat pro humans 1x then they can advertise their university program to phd candidates etc. etc. and get better students/funding.

I read that Deep blue actually lost to Kasparov 1/2 but IBM would never play best of 2/3 because all they wanted was that advertising dollar. It should always have been best 2/3.

If the humans lose it was already said the bot will never play humans again unless a random event happens.


In both instance, these companies have Massive profit ratios vs risk/expense. The humans are being severely underpaid

I thought a good way to try to exploit the bot would be to find it's abstraction threshholds since it essentially uses rounding. If
85% of pot is the same thing to the bot and 109% of the pot is the same thing to the bot as pot (rough numbers obv). You can find an exploit on the bot by bluffing 85% and vbetting 109%.

Attacking the abstraction is key from what i have read

LOL Jason is on life tilt

an article says he sucks and is playing the bot as if it was a human. Jason tilt chats. Then he starts comparing himself to doug polk saying when doug played 5/10 people said he sucked and would never make, so, ya, he is going to be good too.

2 weeks in and now jimmy is giving jason game theory to stop him from endless whines

On January 26 2017 17:33 traxamillion wrote: I thought a good way to try to exploit the bot would be to find it's abstraction threshholds since it essentially uses rounding. If 85% of pot is the same thing to the bot and 109% of the pot is the same thing to the bot as pot (rough numbers obv). You can find an exploit on the bot by bluffing 85% and vbetting 109%. Attacking the abstraction is key from what i have read

yes their open sizes are all numbers they found.

They did an Ask Me Anything on Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/5qi3i9/we_are_professional_poker_players_currently/