|
|
 |
Love my combo :) |
 |
1
 |
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Apr 21 2009 20:36. Posts 15163 | | |
Poker just got even more Interesting.
I started my session playing LAGgy NL10 4tables, and as this is so hard on my brain (I actually use Stove again for many hands) I can't keep it up for more than 1-2 hours.
And when I am tired I just put on my grinder shoes, open couple (9-15)NL5 SH tables and grind for some moneyz and FPP's and have some fun ;o
I managed not to check my cashier at all today as the NL5 grind is so relaxing and its popped at $610.
If I keep this up and balance tilts at NL10 by the nitty NL5 grinds I should be able to taste NL25 in no time. (I will try with around $800, 4BI's will be a buffer zone that I expect to lose before I adjust)
Some standard hands to fill the white space ;o
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
|
| |
|
| 1
| 1
 |
PplusAD Germany. Apr 21 2009 20:48. Posts 7182 | | |
| | (I will try with around $800, 4BI's will be a buffer zone that I expect to lose before I adjust) |
nice
Also i like that u vary between 4 tables creative lag play and 15 tables mass grinding at lower levels.
This helps to not tilt and keep poker fun ( due to variety)
(I started to do this myself some time ago and it worked out great so far. 9-12 tabling Nl50 6max 17/13/2 is so relaxed for me compared to NL100 2 table HU)
also that u dont check the cashier is good
Never play to make fast money !
Always play with the intention to play good without caring about money ( Money will come in the long run when u play good)
Sounds good
Also one thing i did the last months and which helped me greatly is :
I lay some paper besides the computer on which i make one stoke with a pencil for every hand i " spewed - played unnecessary overagressive" or called though i know i was beat.
my goal for every session is not to make money !
My goal is to have a completely white paper without any strokes on it after the playing as much hands as possible
This really prevents me from spewing a ton
Edit
The 23 Hand definitely gets a stroke on my paper ...
calling a 3 bet oop with 23 is just terrible and will cost u a lot of money in the long run
playing LAG is not the same as playing stuipd !!!
playing LAG means u pound on people by abusing their nitiness in a smart way in which u dont depent to much on your cards ...
get reads on people and abuse their leaks in an agressive way
in that 23 example u totally depend on hitting 2 pair or trips
Thats not smart LAG play. Since u have no plan to abuse the player postflop but instead just hope for luck
T_T
|
|
| U see what i did there with A8 ? He 4 bets and there we go insta jam A8 : ---booooom -- . hahahaha ( Krantz) | Last edit: 21/04/2009 20:55 |
|
| 1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Apr 21 2009 20:56. Posts 15163 | | |
| | On April 21 2009 19:44 longple wrote:
calling 3bet w 23 oop is standard ye ^_^
especially vs some1 being 70bb deep  |
This is not as bad of a call as you might think (correct me if I am wrong ;o) when I am counting on luck. I was raising around 35% of my hands at the time of the raise and villain was 1tabling and realised what I was doing.
This made me think that he was capable of 3betting me this lightly with TT+, AQs+ AQo+, even more. (28%-31%)
The weak 3bet is 0.40 and there was $8 if I give myself full implied odds (if you do this only QQ+ than I am slightly -EV-18%). That means I have to stack him 20% of the time to be break even.
Add some meta game value if it works (and this was a rare table with 2 people actually paying attention) + if I fold to 3bets too much I let them exploit my openness. And its at least break even call imo.
You can't obviously expect me to do this in the long run at all. Most of the time I play prudent ABC even when I open my range. I'd call like this once in fifty times at best, but the weak 3bet and the situation at the table made me do it. (As I get better I can probably 4bet with better success, I am a virgin in this area) |
|
| 93% Sure! | Last edit: 21/04/2009 21:18 |
|
| 1
| 1
 |
NewbSaibot United States. Apr 21 2009 21:19. Posts 4947 | | |
This seems to be a bit more on the crazy side rather than LAG side . |
| |
|
| 1
 |
RICHI8 United States. Apr 21 2009 22:05. Posts 1341 | | |
why would you play lag at NL5 and NL10. I can see opening up to get more +EV situations, but outright LAG against LAPs is just asking for high variance.
Btw, you're running hot. |
|
| | Last edit: 21/04/2009 22:06 |
|
| 1
 |
bane United States. Apr 21 2009 23:38. Posts 2379 | | |
someone playing one table =/= someone that is a thinking player that knows what your up to
i think as stated before that the 23 hand is pretty bad your oop aswell
a smart lag plays looser IN POSITION not IN ANY POSITION |
|
| 1 | |
| | On April 21 2009 19:56 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2009 19:44 longple wrote:
calling 3bet w 23 oop is standard ye ^_^
especially vs some1 being 70bb deep |
This is not as bad of a call as you might think (correct me if I am wrong ;o) when I am counting on luck. I was raising around 35% of my hands at the time of the raise and villain was 1tabling and realised what I was doing.
This made me think that he was capable of 3betting me this lightly with TT+, AQs+ AQo+, even more. (28%-31%)
The weak 3bet is 0.40 and there was $8 if I give myself full implied odds (if you do this only QQ+ than I am slightly -EV-18%). That means I have to stack him 20% of the time to be break even.
Add some meta game value if it works (and this was a rare table with 2 people actually paying attention) + if I fold to 3bets too much I let them exploit my openness. And its at least break even call imo.
You can't obviously expect me to do this in the long run at all. Most of the time I play prudent ABC even when I open my range. I'd call like this once in fifty times at best, but the weak 3bet and the situation at the table made me do it. (As I get better I can probably 4bet with better success, I am a virgin in this area)
|
 |
|
| 1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Apr 22 2009 10:08. Posts 15163 | | | |
| |
|
| 1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Apr 22 2009 10:08. Posts 15163 | | | |
| |
|
| 1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Apr 22 2009 10:10. Posts 15163 | | |
I was really tired last night, I need to stack him once in 5% times, not 20%, but I need to win the pot once in 37% of times.
Fuken correct me guys |
| |
|
| |
|
|
 Poker Streams | |
|
Contact Users: 510 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 15:12
(a pair of Queens)
Sweden. Apr 21 2009 20:44. Posts 4472
Although I should really sometimes sit down with PT3 history and evaluate the majority of big pots( I will have far more mistakes than you 
,
,
,
,
,
,
