Terrible Run

"Another thing is that I notice some flaws in my game that I couldn't see before. Like pushing all in for no reason, which really is a spew."

bullshittttttt. its just called monster poker, and is an extremely profitable style

is it just me or is 10nl NITTY AS FUCK

10nl 6max is loose as fuck..=o

anton:

1. shove flop
2. i give up on the turn and c/c minbets or c/f to allins or larger bets
3. i would probably lead the turn, why open 3x in a shorthanded game with such a strong hand like KQ?
4. this is fine

how does 10nl 6max stack up to FR

FR is easily beatable but a bit nitties. 6Max is full of retards that just beg to ship you their money. Ofc you have to play alot more agro

6-max 25NL is easier than 6max 10NL so far after my first session. Most tables of 6-max 10NL are annoying to play as a result of large amounts of shortstacks and players who have no concept of good poker. There are a few regulars, a few players who know what they are doing, and I'd say on every table about 2/6 players are complete gamblers and you will rarely know what they have. You just have to grit your teeth and play through it and develop a method of beating it.

That being said I've done it and it's pretty easy to maintain 5-10pt/BB once you know what you're doing at 10NL 6-max. The idea that everyone is a retard going in with 2-7o is very far off though. Players a dumb but dumb enough that they're unpredictable rather than dumb enough to be shipping you money all the time when you have AA/KK.

25NL so far is EZ so many nits and fullstacks, its paradise. People who actually know a little bit about poker and therefore fold equity is so much higher in many situations. I'm very pleased at the change.

Submitted by : tere here

PokerStars Game #9158828091: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2007/03/30 - 01:32:26 (ET)
Table 'Subra V' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: tere here ($207.70 in chips)
Seat 4: GARDOCK ($319.60 in chips)
Seat 5: elronco ($417.90 in chips)
Seat 6: nickq ($194.70 in chips)
elronco: posts small blind $1
nickq: posts big blind $2

Holecards
Dealt to tere here
tere here: raises $6 to $8
GARDOCK: folds
elronco: folds
nickq: calls $6

Flop (Pot : $17)

   
nickq: checks
tere here: bets $12
nickq: raises $18 to $30
tere here: raises $46 to $76
nickq: folds
tere here collected $75 from pot
elronco leaves the table

Summary
Total pot $77 | Rake $2
Board  
Seat 1: tere here collected ($75)
Seat 4: GARDOCK (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: elronco (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: nickq (big blind) folded on the Flop

Submitted by : tere here

PokerStars Game #9158867708: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2007/03/30 - 01:36:28 (ET)
Table 'Eurybates V' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: tere here ($199 in chips)
Seat 2: mrp123 ($200 in chips)
Seat 3: jus2awsum ($265.85 in chips)
Seat 4: chekdstak ($404.95 in chips)
Seat 5: vincestr ($169.15 in chips)
Seat 6: kmagnum ($71.20 in chips)
vincestr: posts small blind $1
kmagnum: posts big blind $2

Holecards
Dealt to tere here
tere here: raises $6 to $8
mrp123: calls $8
jus2awsum: folds
chekdstak: folds
vincestr: folds
kmagnum: calls $6

Flop (Pot : $25)

   
kmagnum: checks
tere here: bets $18
mrp123: folds
kmagnum: folds
tere here collected $23.75 from pot

Summary
Total pot $25 | Rake $1.25
Board  
Seat 1: tere here collected ($23.75)
Seat 2: mrp123 folded on the Flop
Seat 3: jus2awsum folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: chekdstak (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: vincestr (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: kmagnum (big blind) folded on the Flop

Submitted by : tere here

PokerStars Game #9158943372: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2007/03/30 - 01:44:08 (ET)
Table 'Miram V' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: tere here ($259 in chips)
Seat 2: JPBel ($479.60 in chips)
Seat 3: sugawolf17 ($316.70 in chips)
Seat 4: lemonjj ($243.80 in chips)
Seat 5: TheProphet07 ($209.15 in chips)
Seat 6: natdog100 ($277.50 in chips)
JPBel: posts small blind $1
sugawolf17: posts big blind $2

Holecards
Dealt to tere here
lemonjj: folds
TheProphet07: raises $4 to $6
natdog100: folds
tere here: calls $6
JPBel: calls $5
sugawolf17: folds

Flop (Pot : $20)

   
JPBel: checks
TheProphet07: checks
tere here: bets $14
JPBel: folds
TheProphet07: calls $14

Turn (Pot : $48)

   
TheProphet07: checks
tere here: bets $36
TheProphet07: folds
tere here collected $45.65 from pot

Summary
Total pot $48 | Rake $2.35
Board  
Seat 1: tere here (button) collected ($45.65)
Seat 2: JPBel (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 3: sugawolf17 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: lemonjj folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: TheProphet07 folded on the Turn
Seat 6: natdog100 folded before Flop (didn't bet)

1st one is pretty sketchy because if the guy has KQ i have only 9 outs....but on a board like that and since i had been quiet for a while, a play like that looks like AA or KK and with a Q24 board i can most likely expect that the 2 or 4 missed him and he had 1 pair and not a set...therefore if hes a good player, he can most likely fold Qx...however if he just calls on flop I might have to slow down and check because it already indicates that he is leanin on the side that he doesnt believe me and i have much less FE....
2nd one is standard
3rd one looks like a vbet on turn and although he calls flop hes a full stack, giving me odds to make him fold...ie short stacks are more likely to call cause they alraedy have a greater % of their stack in ...

The difference between 1st and 3rd is that if he calls a 3bet on flop then i have much less FE whereas if he calls 1 bet on flop i dont know how strong his hand is, and therefore his range is big enough that I have FE to bet again...(here he most likely had a ten)