If he looks stupid, he probably is - Page 2

On May 06 2014 22:20 NotSorry wrote: I'm a bit surprised no one has posted a selfie and their "iq" in here yet, your lack of dick waving is disappointing.

We're being smart, if we do it, then Loco will just wait, then post his iQ after all of us, and we'll feel like bitches!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IQ_distribution.svg

I'm betting most of lp would be between 115 - 130

stephen hawking does not approve of this study

+ Show Spoiler +

On May 07 2014 05:37 Mariuslol wrote: Show nested quote + On May 06 2014 12:34 GoldRush wrote: Stroggoz - IQ is your ability to learn things fast etc, which in poker is huge since we are essentially doing multiplayer puzzles vs dif ppl and ppl changing strategies all the time, its important. You can actually be quite a retard, and good in Poker. It's pretty normal to be insane at a few things and suck at others if there's something majorly wrong with you. A damaged hippocampus or how you spell it can turn people into mathematical geniuses, but then they become newb at other stuff. Back a 100 years, people used to calculate intelligence on 3 criteras I think, numbers, solving word puzzles and finding the next piece of a puzzle. Which today is seen as a load of crack!! More prominent professors and shit talk about 10 - 12 things that are really important to determine intelligence, and go into things as personal intelligence, how we navigate through our environment, how we treat ourselves, and a lot of stuff I can't remember right now (to lazy to google). A lot of physicists believe that one of the best way to tell if someone is really intelligent, is by simple test, such as the marshmellow tests when we're a kid, and something similar to that, but more advanced when we're an adult. The ability to think long term, and avoid instant gratification smartly, making choices that are best for us in the long term.

Calculating intelligence using these techniques is similar to calculating the area of a circle with single line vectors, the more vectors we use, the more accurate our answer is. There is probably no real way of us ever knowing with exact precision unless we somehow upload 100% of our minds into a computer that can analyse us, but in order for that to be possible, the computer has to be smarter then is. In which case we are probably all dead or our species has been enslaved.

On May 07 2014 06:15 bigredhoss wrote: stephen hawking does not approve of this study + Show Spoiler +

Rofl!!!!!

Mensa tested, Your Mother Approved : 156

Guys, head looks a bit round. I think he's trying to trick us!!

On May 07 2014 19:16 NotSorry wrote: Mensa tested, Your Mother Approved : 156

you look dumb , another proof !

I don't trust online IQ tests. The higher the score they give you, the higher the chance that you will share the website / name of the site.

On May 08 2014 00:05 k4ir0s wrote: I don't trust online IQ tests. The higher the score they give you, the higher the chance that you will share the website / name of the site.

fuuuuuck, that explains a lot lol

Tried googling, taking 5 of them, felt the numbers were a little odd, then some stuff about how amazing a test I could get if I bought something, or subscribed and shit like that (was kinda celebrating, telling my dad on facebook how smart I was).