Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1099517
Submitted by : drone666
PokerStars Zoom Hand #243873773116: Holdem No Limit ($2.50/$5.00) - 2023/05/24 11:37:25 CUST [2023/05/24 0:37:25 ET]
Table Delta Bootis 2-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: DroneHuStl3 ($537.65 in chips)
Seat 2: SkyRiSinG ($571.42 in chips)
DroneHuStl3: posts small blind $2.50
SkyRiSinG: posts big blind $5
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to DroneHuStl3  
DroneHuStl3: raises $7 to $12
SkyRiSinG: raises $39 to $51
DroneHuStl3: calls $39
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $102.00)
  
SkyRiSinG: bets $66.33
DroneHuStl3: calls $66.33
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $234.66)
SkyRiSinG: bets $153.89
DroneHuStl3: calls $153.89
River (Pot : $542.44)
SkyRiSinG: bets $300.20 and is all-in
DroneHuStl3: calls $266.43 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($33.77) returned to SkyRiSinG
Showdown
SkyRiSinG: shows   (three of a kind, Fours)
DroneHuStl3: shows (two pair, Jacks and Fours)
SkyRiSinG collected $1073.80 from pot
Summary
Total pot $1075.30 | Rake $1.50
Board
Seat 1: DroneHuStl3 (button) (small blind) showed and lost with two pair, Jacks and Fours
Seat 2: SkyRiSinG (big blind) showed and won ($1073.80) with three of a kind, Fours
 |
Comments |
 |
1
 |
Stroggoz New Zealand. May 25 2023 05:18. Posts 5296 | | |
I havn't played in like two years but from my recollection people do these weird merge plays at a way higher frequency than the bot did it. Russians really liked doing it as well (looking at you Steffan). Is that true or am I wrong? |
|
| One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings | Last edit: 25/05/2023 05:19 |
|
| 1
 |
drone666 Brasil. May 25 2023 05:36. Posts 1821 | | |
honestly I was expecting the opposite, solvers barrel with all the low 4x like 64s 74s 84s 94s I think, but as it's weird for players to bluff with naked bottom pair on this texture since there are a lot of natural bluffs to choose from, my call is not solver approved obv but my gut feeling said he was clicking buttons, and to be honest I don't completely understand why the solver barrel these hands |
|
| Dont listen to anything I say | |
|
| 4
 |
Baalim Mexico. Jun 10 2023 03:24. Posts 34246 | | |
| | On May 25 2023 04:36 drone666 wrote:
honestly I was expecting the opposite, solvers barrel with all the low 4x like 64s 74s 84s 94s I think, but as it's weird for players to bluff with naked bottom pair on this texture since there are a lot of natural bluffs to choose from, my call is not solver approved obv but my gut feeling said he was clicking buttons, and to be honest I don't completely understand why the solver barrel these hands |
pushing equity against broadway floats and having bluffs in certain rivers that hit every draw? |
|
| Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
| 1
|
Santafairy Korea (South). Jun 24 2023 13:28. Posts 2225 | | |
you can't just bet a pair on a draw heavy board in heads up that's suicide |
|
| It seems to be not very profitable in the long run to play those kind of hands. - Gus Hansen | |
|
| 1
|
drone666 Brasil. Jun 25 2023 04:13. Posts 1821 | | |
| | On June 10 2023 02:24 Baalim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 25 2023 04:36 drone666 wrote:
honestly I was expecting the opposite, solvers barrel with all the low 4x like 64s 74s 84s 94s I think, but as it's weird for players to bluff with naked bottom pair on this texture since there are a lot of natural bluffs to choose from, my call is not solver approved obv but my gut feeling said he was clicking buttons, and to be honest I don't completely understand why the solver barrel these hands |
pushing equity against broadway floats and having bluffs in certain rivers that hit every draw?
|
it might be something like this, I was studying a bit of 6max and found spots where this is a quite common line from the solver |
|
| Dont listen to anything I say | |
|
| |
|
