HEM1 Support ending

i think how pt4 works, and flows as you play is better, and the layout. but as, how to use the stats, the numbers, info you can get out of the software, HEM2 seems to have a lot more, and its all better n stuff.

But then again, im not the right guy to ask lol

Don't want to derail the thread, but came across this post lol

-

Shiiit

Ok, now back to hem1, shiiit, lemon sure got a tough choice, hem2 or pt4, how will he choose?

I feel, a small apology for derailing wasn't quite enough, so here's a pretty good song as well, to make it perfectly alright:

cant believe i actually read this shit -.-

On April 09 2014 13:38 Mariuslol wrote: Ok, now back to hem1, shiiit, lemon sure got a tough choice, hem2 or pt4, how will he choose?

PT4
I sunk like 30 hrs into it, sunk cost baby.

Still need to spend like 30-60 more to actually make it good/get used to it...

there's this small annoying things in PT4 like
- can't export w/stats easily to LP
- you don't see HHs everywhere, in HEM1 in all stats reports there's a window with hands histories all you have to do it click PT4 is so bad in this reports etc.
- on the table it doesn't show pot size in last 5 hands so when I want to get reads retrospectively I have to click on every single icon on each table, look for big pot click again
- stats in popups show instanced even when there's 0 sample. HEM stops showing instances without hovering with large samples too it just gets annoying
- stats are weird, named arbitrarily (probe bet wtf) and many are missing - need to spend even more time on setting up the ones I want

They just drove me crazy really but I guess I need to spend hours trying to get used to them or finding workarounds... or I guess buy SSD get used to HEM2 change everything all over again another time wasted.

Fuck you HEM I want HEM1 :D

I just sent pm to all the top blog guys on 2+2, then switched to HEM2 lol

Vast majority said HEM2 was superior in every way when it came to going through hands, analyzing, and stuff like that.

But what do I know, just repeating stuff.

+ i asked ppl i know on skype that play poker, one of them said I was a "faggot" if i didn't use hem2 (and I thought to myself, lol, i don't want to be that).

So kinda sealed the deal for me

Learn to combine your posts for fucks sake.

You turned a decent, coherent interesting thread, into a shitstorm.

On April 09 2014 16:13 devon06atX wrote: Learn to combine your posts for fucks sake. You turned a decent, coherent interesting thread, into a shitstorm.

Yeah, my bad, but in my defence, this time I noticed it, and I managed to put it back on track. So I'm working on it

On April 09 2014 16:13 devon06atX wrote: Learn to combine your posts for fucks sake. You turned a decent, coherent interesting forum, into a shitstorm.

fyp


after years, hm2 is still a buggy piece of garbage imo

Seriously? I saw the 40% off, was obviously snapcalling that upgrade.....

Can't be that bad? I have a subscription to pt somewhere.... I prefer HM1 over it...

wtf to do.

CASE OF BEER OR HM2/WTFEVER, OMG

which is lighter as a software pt4 or HEM2? seems like HEM2 will suck hard for me without a SSD, althought i got a quadcore with ddr3s and etc etc lol

On April 10 2014 00:40 Spitfiree wrote: which is lighter as a software pt4 or HEM2? seems like HEM2 will suck hard for me without a SSD, althought i got a quadcore with ddr3s and etc etc lol

its not about SSD but HEM2 does require about 2GB in ram per 500k hands in your database to run smoothly

Stopped using both software, since they both wouldn't support the french poker's sites. I guess that was another reason why I stopped playing online. Now can they support it ?
I remember I had a really hard time to configure the HHs history for PT1 or 2 and I'm not sure if I'd ever want to use it again >_<

On April 10 2014 00:40 Spitfiree wrote: which is lighter as a software pt4 or HEM2? seems like HEM2 will suck hard for me without a SSD, althought i got a quadcore with ddr3s and etc etc lol

PT4 definitely needs less resources from your computer.