Superbowl Seahawks vs Broncos

I dont even know the rules to football but I watched this at someone's house and kept laughing every time the orange guys fucked up so miserably.

On February 02 2014 21:53 PuertoRican wrote:

The pornhub twitter is pretty great.

GG won a shit ton of prop bets on this one..

So brutal. Really wanted to see Manning do well and take down the Superbowl. Pretty embarrassing

Worst part about watching this game was knowing that if the 49ers didn't run so fucking bad vs the Seahawks they woulda womped the Broncos too.

On February 02 2014 20:06 PuertoRican wrote: Russell Wilson wins MVP was at +1000 or +2000, or something like that. I didn't bet it though. He has a good chance to win it here.

was this late in the game? cause i bet it before the game at +375

damn cosmo are u a logistician?

On February 02 2014 19:57 bigredhoss wrote: lol Aikman just kill yourself: "yeah, you gotta do the math, they need 4 touchdowns and 3 2-point conversions" when score is 29-0

uh 4 tds and 3 2-point conversions is 30.................................

On February 03 2014 02:32 Venrae wrote: Show nested quote + On February 02 2014 19:57 bigredhoss wrote: lol Aikman just kill yourself: "yeah, you gotta do the math, they need 4 touchdowns and 3 2-point conversions" when score is 29-0 uh 4 tds and 3 2-point conversions is 30.................................

LOL is this real life?? that's only true if you assume they don't kick the xp after the first 2 TD+2pt conversions, which is retarded. obviously the implication was that they needed 3 2-pt conversions with the score being 29-0.

8+8+8+7 = 31

On February 02 2014 23:33 JonnyCosMo wrote: Worst part about watching this game was knowing that if the 49ers didn't run so fucking bad vs the Seahawks they woulda womped the Broncos too.

Fucking posts like this. It's like people like you just assume the reffing is always only on one side. Like the reffing is never on the other side

On February 04 2014 02:51 Trav94 wrote: Show nested quote + On February 02 2014 23:33 JonnyCosMo wrote: Worst part about watching this game was knowing that if the 49ers didn't run so fucking bad vs the Seahawks they woulda womped the Broncos too. Fucking posts like this. It's like people like you just assume the reffing is always only on one side. Like the reffing is never on the other side

i don't see how that negates his point?

On February 03 2014 03:12 bigredhoss wrote: Show nested quote + On February 03 2014 02:32 Venrae wrote:   On February 02 2014 19:57 bigredhoss wrote: lol Aikman just kill yourself: "yeah, you gotta do the math, they need 4 touchdowns and 3 2-point conversions" when score is 29-0 uh 4 tds and 3 2-point conversions is 30................................. LOL is this real life?? that's only true if you assume they don't kick the xp after the first 2 TD+2pt conversions, which is retarded. obviously the implication was that they needed 3 2-pt conversions with the score being 29-0. 8+8+8+7 = 31

4 tds, 3 2pt is the minimum needed to be ahead. I don't see why you're so insulted by this point.

On February 04 2014 04:15 Venrae wrote: Show nested quote + On February 03 2014 03:12 bigredhoss wrote:   On February 03 2014 02:32 Venrae wrote:   On February 02 2014 19:57 bigredhoss wrote: lol Aikman just kill yourself: "yeah, you gotta do the math, they need 4 touchdowns and 3 2-point conversions" when score is 29-0 uh 4 tds and 3 2-point conversions is 30................................. LOL is this real life?? that's only true if you assume they don't kick the xp after the first 2 TD+2pt conversions, which is retarded. obviously the implication was that they needed 3 2-pt conversions with the score being 29-0. 8+8+8+7 = 31 4 tds, 3 2pt is the minimum needed to be ahead. I don't see why you're so insulted by this point.

probably because it's stupid and wrongly implies they needed 3 2-pt conversions, but if you're smart enough to use a computer you already know that, so nice troll i guess.

How does it wrongly imply that they need 3 2pt conversions? it's the minimum amount of TDs/FGs to be in the lead.

google "football scoring system" and use windows built-in calculator for some sick enlightenment

I played the sport for 10 years, I know the fucking scoring system. I have no idea what you're so upset about. His math is fine, it's the most probable way to earn 30 points in the least amount of possessions. You can do it in 2 2pt and 1pt PATs, but 2 2pt on the first two TD's is statistically unlikely, so his scoring to get 30 is the most likely way for the Broncos to have gained the lead

there's obviously no way to prove it, but i would lay 10-1 that he was not thinking of any of that given his consistently idiotic commentary.

i have to be honest though, i also didn't even think of that, and i do look like a tool with some of my comments lol. my bad..

It's all good bro, just funny you got so mad about it :^)

except they likely would have played for 29 not 30.