1
 |
fakeshaver   United States. Feb 16 2009 11:52. Posts 1313 | | |
did they raise the rake or lower it at nl25 with the new update? |
|
|
1
 |
hkbubbletea   Canada. Feb 16 2009 13:16. Posts 1575 | | |
With the amount of pros they sponsor, it can only go up! Also I didn't know they could do that without some kind of commission review and stuff. |
|
|
|
1
 |
Frosty   Netherlands. Feb 16 2009 13:37. Posts 97 | | |
From what I heard it was 5c/1$ rake/pot, and they changed it to 1c/20c rake/pot.
So the amount is technically the same, but they rake more since most pots don't make it to a dollar, or somewhere in between full dollar values. |
|
|
1
| |
fulltilt hates microstakes?
|
|
|
1
 |
PplusAD   Germany. Feb 16 2009 17:41. Posts 7182 | | |
Yepp
they increased the rake for Nl25
from 5c/1$ to 1c/20c
this is a drastic increase imo ...
f.e if Button raises and bb calls it will lead to a 1.80$ pot with 5 c rake taken in old method
in new method its 9c rake taken which is almost double >_<
|
|
U see what i did there with A8 ? He 4 bets and there we go insta jam A8 : ---booooom -- . hahahaha ( Krantz) | |
|
|
1
 |
edzwoo   United States. Feb 16 2009 17:47. Posts 5911 | | |
Ewwwww, that's so fail for any micro grinder on Full Tilt.
Best idea is to shortstack and move up on rakeback lol. |
|
|
1
| |
omfg are they stupid ?
They make so much rake anyway... why do this ? |
|
|
|
1
 |
SpasticInk   Sweden. Feb 16 2009 18:37. Posts 6298 | | |
| On February 16 2009 16:47 ConquistadoR wrote:
omfg are they stupid ?
They make so much rake anyway... why do this ? |
more monies and hopes that noone notices and keeps playing there |
|
|
1
| |
oh wow that's really douchey
|
|
|
1
 |
fenner   Australia. Feb 16 2009 18:59. Posts 2188 | | |
|
|
1
 |
Orome   Switzerland. Feb 16 2009 19:02. Posts 214 | | |
FTP rake sucks for microstakes, but it's the same as PS at NL50 and above, right? |
|
|
1
 |
PplusAD   Germany. Feb 16 2009 19:03. Posts 7182 | | |
they basically destoryed the rakeback for Nl25 with that ....
since u have to pay about the amount more now than what u had net profit from rakeback in the old method
@ Orme
yes.
i wrote their Feedback support that this is total bullshit

not that i think they will care
|
|
U see what i did there with A8 ? He 4 bets and there we go insta jam A8 : ---booooom -- . hahahaha ( Krantz) | Last edit: 16/02/2009 19:33 |
|
|
1
 |
Uptown   . Feb 16 2009 19:57. Posts 3557 | | |
so while stars made changes to make life at micros a little bit better, FTP goes the opposite direction.
Interesting... |
|
|
|
1
 |
JYang   United States. Feb 16 2009 20:14. Posts 2669 | | |
its easy to move up stakes on rakeback alone... shouldnt matter to most players who have a clue what theyre doing |
|
|
1
 |
PplusAD   Germany. Feb 16 2009 20:20. Posts 7182 | | |
yeha that was probably what they kinda thought ....
nobody of the regulars will play Nl25 for longer than 1-2 months anyways before they move to NL50
and donks who just wanna gamble a bit of their job money on NL25 dont even notice the difference anyways if u show them, nor do they care about rake at all
still i hate this change |
|
U see what i did there with A8 ? He 4 bets and there we go insta jam A8 : ---booooom -- . hahahaha ( Krantz) | |
|
|
1
 |
traxamillion   United States. Feb 16 2009 21:08. Posts 10468 | | |
|
|
1
 |
vlseph   United States. Feb 17 2009 14:37. Posts 3026 | | |
is rake at nl50 changed?
how badly does this hurt players?
does it really destroy all the rakeback advantages or just most of it |
|
The only hands a nit balances in his range are the nuts, the second nuts, and the third nuts. | |
|
|
1
 |
Shenny   Canada. Feb 17 2009 15:22. Posts 1514 | | |
doesnt affect me, but just the fact that they would do this to their lower players makes me sure i never want to deposit and give to this cum guzzling greedy site. |
|
|
1
 |
Avius   Iraq. Feb 18 2009 07:14. Posts 219 | | |
is there anyway to get rb to an existing account on FTP? |
|
|
|
1
 |
lachlan   Australia. Feb 18 2009 07:41. Posts 6991 | | |
FTP sucks....... so shady |
|
|
|
|