1
|
Sicks Macks   United States. Jan 02 2009 23:34. Posts 3929 | | |
|
|
|
1
|
vlseph   United States. Jan 02 2009 23:42. Posts 3026 | | |
i just jizzed in my pants
if anyone accepts |
|
The only hands a nit balances in his range are the nuts, the second nuts, and the third nuts. | |
|
|
1
|
spets1   Australia. Jan 02 2009 23:44. Posts 2179 | | |
antonius or ivey should accept |
|
|
|
1
|
spets1   Australia. Jan 02 2009 23:54. Posts 2179 | | |
DURR:
|
ya i mean this wasnt supposed to be posted yet but w/e. Anyway... there are obv a few conditions, im out of it- but off the top of my head:
1) 200-400min (nl/plo obv)
2) can change tables anytime eff stacks are >250bb
3) have to reload when stacks are <75bb
4) $$ won in the challenge is kept obv (if i win 750k in poker, i get that PLUS your 500k- if i lose 750k in poker you get 2.25m total).
5) same stakes the whole time
6) not open to phil galfond
hmm probly some other stuff but im out of it b/c i jus got owned @ some scrabble. I was gonna think up official 'terms' and post em or something, but thought i had another week or two b4 it became public. |
|
|
|
|
1
|
Jubert69   United States. Jan 02 2009 23:56. Posts 3191 | | |
Um, Phil Hellmuth one time. |
|
|
1
|
Cro)Deadman   Croatia. Jan 02 2009 23:59. Posts 3943 | | |
can anyone tell me why is it not open to Phil Galfond?
that seems a bit wierd. |
|
|
|
1
|
TheHuHu3   United States. Jan 03 2009 00:02. Posts 5544 | | |
|
|
|
1
|
n0rthf4ce   United States. Jan 03 2009 00:05. Posts 8119 | | |
| On January 02 2009 22:59 Cro)Deadman wrote:
can anyone tell me why is it not open to Phil Galfond?
that seems a bit wierd. |
because jman is a beast? |
|
|
|
1
|
n0rthf4ce   United States. Jan 03 2009 00:06. Posts 8119 | | |
i might do it but i have to talk it over w/ a bunch of ppl first tho |
|
|
|
1
| |
| On January 02 2009 22:59 Cro)Deadman wrote:
can anyone tell me why is it not open to Phil Galfond?
that seems a bit wierd. |
cause he's
A. Dirty
B. Sick
C. Nasty
D. Hero
E. All of the above |
|
|
|
1
|
Sicks Macks   United States. Jan 03 2009 00:10. Posts 3929 | | |
| On January 02 2009 22:59 Cro)Deadman wrote:
can anyone tell me why is it not open to Phil Galfond?
that seems a bit wierd. |
and they're friends right? |
|
|
|
1
|
Sicks Macks   United States. Jan 03 2009 00:11. Posts 3929 | | |
| On January 02 2009 23:06 n0rthf4ce wrote:
i might do it but i have to talk it over w/ a bunch of ppl first tho |
wow... how much of yourself do you think you'd take? |
|
|
|
4
|
[vital]Myth   United States. Jan 03 2009 00:14. Posts 12159 | | |
| On January 02 2009 23:11 Sicks Macks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 02 2009 23:06 n0rthf4ce wrote:
i might do it but i have to talk it over w/ a bunch of ppl first tho |
wow... how much of yourself do you think you'd take?
| he'll take 100% and if he runs bad then it doesn't matter because frinkx and i will save his life |
|
Eh, I can go a few more orbits in life, before taxes blind me out - PoorUser | |
|
|
1
|
TheHuHu3   United States. Jan 03 2009 00:21. Posts 5544 | | |
| On January 02 2009 22:59 Cro)Deadman wrote:
can anyone tell me why is it not open to Phil Galfond?
that seems a bit wierd. |
Either they are really, really close friends or Galfond has an edge on Tom. |
|
|
|
1
|
TheHuHu3   United States. Jan 03 2009 00:22. Posts 5544 | | |
|
|
|
1
|
n0rthf4ce   United States. Jan 03 2009 00:28. Posts 8119 | | |
durrrr is very smart and i have no edge in a direct hu match but im hoping variance and 1m handicap can give me a worthy enough edge. but probably not....i'll have to think it through |
|
|
|
1
|
Maynard!   United States. Jan 03 2009 00:36. Posts 4453 | | |
Is 50k enough hands to minimize variance enough? Doesnt seem like a good bet for durr.
If I had the money I'd buy in on some action of a good player going against durr. |
|
Now I really am a busto. Thanks FTP. | Last edit: 03/01/2009 00:42 |
|
|
1
|
Python817   Canada. Jan 03 2009 00:40. Posts 2733 | | |
|
|
1
|
Suicide   United States. Jan 03 2009 00:42. Posts 482 | | |
This makes me even more of a fan of durrr, he's just as much of a degenerate gambler as he is a poker player |
|
stevesbets: aboslutley, positivley, inconceivable // lolmonies: preposterous! | |
|
|
1
|
TheHuHu3   United States. Jan 03 2009 00:47. Posts 5544 | | |
| On January 02 2009 23:42 Suicide wrote:
This makes me even more of a fan of durrr, he's just as much of a degenerate gambler as he is a poker player |
It must be lonely at the top. Motherfucker is only like 22, too. |
|
|
|
|