Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 212181
Submitted by : Royal_Rumble
Full Tilt Poker Game #2665608508: Table Keifer (6 max) - $0.50/$1 - No Limit Hold'em - 15:56:55 ET - 2007/06/14
Seat 1: joshrogo ($85.15)
Seat 2: TRESTON ($155.95)
Seat 4: chL41 ($100)
Seat 5: Hero ($98.50)
Seat 6: Raekw0n123 ($132.70)
Hero posts the small blind of $0.50
Raekw0n123 posts the big blind of $1
The button is in seat #4
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero  
joshrogo has 15 seconds left to act
joshrogo folds
TRESTON raises to $2
chL41 folds
Hero has 15 seconds left to act
Hero raises to $7
Raekw0n123 folds
TRESTON calls $5
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $15.00)
  
Hero has 15 seconds left to act
Hero bets $10
TRESTON raises to $20
Hero has 15 seconds left to act
Hero raises to $91.50, and is all in
TRESTON calls $71.50
Hero shows
TRESTON shows  
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $198.00)
River (Pot : $198.00)
Hero shows a pair of Eights
TRESTON shows a straight, Eight high
TRESTON wins the pot ($195) with a straight, Eight high
Hero is sitting out
Summary
Total pot $198 | Rake $3
Board:
Seat 1: joshrogo didn't bet (folded)
Seat 2: TRESTON showed and won ($195) with a straight, Eight high
Seat 4: chL41 (button) didn't bet (folded)
Seat 5: Hero (small blind) showed and lost with a pair of Eights
Seat 6: Raekw0n123 (big blind) folded before the Flop
 |
Comments |
 |
1
 |
Loco Canada. Jun 14 2007 14:06. Posts 20963 | | |
this is just so damn terrible |
|
| fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount | |
|
| 1
 |
mrwongie Canada. Jun 14 2007 14:12. Posts 1710 | | |
9$ pf, 16$ flop min raise = nuts fold at best you are agsint 2overs with flush draws. |
|
| 1 | |
why? If I continue in this hand, it will be for stacks anyway.
My opponent was a weak player, against whom i won't fold an overpair. |
|
| money won is twice as sweet as money earned. | |
|
| 1
|
mrwongie Canada. Jun 14 2007 14:13. Posts 1710 | | |
weak exactly, he is being the aggressor in this hand then it is a easily fold. He usually calls right and not raise? |
|
| 1 | | |
|
| money won is twice as sweet as money earned. | |
|
| 1 | |
he is weak does not mean he is passive, ok? those god damned sons of bitches minraise all day long with air. |
|
| money won is twice as sweet as money earned. | |
|
| 1
 |
capaneo Canada. Jun 14 2007 14:21. Posts 8465 | | | |
|
| In US everyone is happy as long as all the prices are rising. Unless its crude oil - Marc Faber | |
|
| 1
|
capaneo Canada. Jun 14 2007 14:27. Posts 8465 | | |
This is actually bad leaning towards terrible play. specially at ur limit. SPECIALLY 6max. you played all the streets wrong. This is exactly what I told you not to do when we had a lesson together! |
|
| In US everyone is happy as long as all the prices are rising. Unless its crude oil - Marc Faber | |
|
| 1 | |
ok, i am still learning, but to understand why i played like this you need to see what kind of play i have faced on NL100:
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/210974
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/209449
not to forget that there are 1 million draws out there.
seems like i made a really really bad play there, that's at least what everybody tells me.
I didn't have played lots of hands with that guy, but from what I had seen, he seemed like a bad player.
My push was bad,
but my raise on flop was not that bad, considering what he had, no?
i wouldn't have raised a bigger raise, I would have raised a limper and a minraise is like... I don't know, more a limp than a raise to me.
|
|
| money won is twice as sweet as money earned. | Last edit: 14/06/2007 14:36 |
|
| 1 | |
ok, two things:
1) probably I did that because those minraises already put me on lifetime tilt.
2) it's great i am such a bad player. Why? I was a winning player at SNGs up to $11, at NL25, at NL50 and I made profit so far at NL100.
so i am such a bad player, but i was able to win so far. Considering the fact how much space is left for improvement, this is a seems like a promising future. |
|
| money won is twice as sweet as money earned. | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
