Submitted by : Daut

PokerStars Game #8002846771: Hold'em No Limit ($25/$50) - 2007/01/18 - 14:18:41 (ET)
Table 'Saturn V' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: plghh ($6491 in chips)
Seat 2: pandabear22 ($1197 in chips)
Seat 3: daisy99999 ($4408.30 in chips)
Seat 4: ayellowvette ($2872 in chips)
Seat 5: hotmark777 ($12313.20 in chips)
Seat 6: ilvdnfl ($5738 in chips)
Seat 7: rSMig ($1297 in chips)
Seat 8: Daut44 ($9195 in chips)
Seat 9: Grimstarr ($5144 in chips)
Daut44: posts small blind $25
Grimstarr: posts big blind $50

Holecards
Dealt to Daut44
plghh: raises $150 to $200
pandabear22: folds
daisy99999: folds
ayellowvette: folds
hotmark777: calls $200
ilvdnfl: folds
rSMig: folds
Daut44: calls $175
Grimstarr: folds

Flop (Pot : $650)

   
Daut44: checks
plghh: bets $400
hotmark777: calls $400
Daut44: raises $1000 to $1400
plghh: folds
hotmark777: raises $2100 to $3500
Daut44 said, "222 good raise"
Daut44: folds
hotmark777 collected $3847 from pot
hotmark777: doesn't show hand

Summary
Total pot $3850 | Rake $3
Board  
Seat 1: plghh folded on the Flop
Seat 2: pandabear22 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: daisy99999 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: ayellowvette folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: hotmark777 collected ($3847)
Seat 6: ilvdnfl folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: rSMig (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: Daut44 (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 9: Grimstarr (big blind) folded before Flop

he obviously had 3-4 you scrub!

j/k, but i think ur lucky the board is as it is

flat then raise yeah that's pretty indicative of 555 in this spot

Nice fold I guess, classic Bigballs fold though

Solid. I dont think you can really call here vs hotmark

Yep good fold Im sure. I dont see how his hand cant be anything but an overset. Well disguised!!

lol dautastic

Its a very classy laydown and i would bet alot he had u beat and i think his line is very bad, why not let u do the work????



Please, Please do not ever tell these fucks what u laydown!

Submitted by : albonycee

POKERSTARS GAME #8002846771: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($25/$50) - 2007/01/18 - 14:18:41 (ET)
Table 'Saturn V' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: plghh ($6491 in chips)
Seat 2: pandabear22 ($1197 in chips)
Seat 3: daisy99999 ($4408.30 in chips)
Seat 4: ayellowvette ($2872 in chips)
Seat 5: hotmark777 ($12313.20 in chips)
Seat 6: ilvdnfl ($5738 in chips)
Seat 7: rSMig ($1297 in chips)
Seat 8: Daut44 ($9195 in chips)
Seat 9: Grimstarr ($5144 in chips)
Daut44: posts small blind $25
Grimstarr: posts big blind $50

Holecards
Dealt to hotmark777
plghh: raises $150 to $200
pandabear22: folds
daisy99999: folds
ayellowvette: folds
hotmark777: calls $200
ilvdnfl: folds
rSMig: folds
Daut44: calls $175
Grimstarr: folds

Flop (Pot : $650)

   
Daut44: checks
plghh: bets $400
hotmark777: calls $400
Daut44: raises $1000 to $1400
plghh: folds
hotmark777: raises $2100 to $3500
Daut44 said, "222 good raise"
Daut44: folds
hotmark777 collected $3847 from pot
hotmark777: doesn't show hand

Summary
Total pot $3850 | Rake $3
Board  
Seat 1: plghh folded on the Flop
Seat 2: pandabear22 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: daisy99999 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: ayellowvette folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: hotmark777 collected ($3847)
Seat 6: ilvdnfl folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: rSMig (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: Daut44 (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 9: Grimstarr (big blind) folded before Flop

beautiful

lol ur sick.

zomg the 2 was coming on river i assure 100%

bad laydown ;D

B-E-A-utiful

Weak. You need to learn this
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/129450

Very bad laydown bigballs. Hotmark is a man who makes plays and know your tight and will be doing this on a bluff or with an overpair.

On January 18 2007 15:24 albonycee wrote: Submitted by : albonycee POKERSTARS GAME #8002846771: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($25/$50) - 2007/01/18 - 14:18:41 (ET) Table 'Saturn V' 9-max Seat #7 is the button Seat 1: plghh ($6491 in chips) Seat 2: pandabear22 ($1197 in chips) Seat 3: daisy99999 ($4408.30 in chips) Seat 4: ayellowvette ($2872 in chips) Seat 5: hotmark777 ($12313.20 in chips) Seat 6: ilvdnfl ($5738 in chips) Seat 7: rSMig ($1297 in chips) Seat 8: Daut44 ($9195 in chips) Seat 9: Grimstarr ($5144 in chips) Daut44: posts small blind $25 Grimstarr: posts big blind $50 Holecards Dealt to hotmark777 plghh: raises $150 to $200 pandabear22: folds daisy99999: folds ayellowvette: folds hotmark777: calls $200 ilvdnfl: folds rSMig: folds Daut44: calls $175 Grimstarr: folds Flop (Pot : $650)     Daut44: checks plghh: bets $400 hotmark777: calls $400 Daut44: raises $1000 to $1400 plghh: folds hotmark777: raises $2100 to $3500 Daut44 said, "222 good raise" Daut44: folds hotmark777 collected $3847 from pot hotmark777: doesn't show hand Summary Total pot $3850 | Rake $3 Board   Seat 1: plghh folded on the Flop Seat 2: pandabear22 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 3: daisy99999 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 4: ayellowvette folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 5: hotmark777 collected ($3847) Seat 6: ilvdnfl folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 7: rSMig (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 8: Daut44 (small blind) folded on the Flop Seat 9: Grimstarr (big blind) folded before Flop

Where did this hand history come from? Is it made up?

Solid? I thinkit's a ridiculous fold

I think hotmark is neither bad enough nor good enough to make that raise with 55

he's in position on you too.
seems very unlikely he'd put that much pressure on you with that good of a hand

i do realize its deep

I think a bluff here is likely, considering how unlikely you think it is

lol, yes it's made up

On January 18 2007 22:15 Rxd Rxxf wrote: lol, yes it's made up

umm no. its from 2+2.

fairly easy laydown

lol

many high stakes forum bannings

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sho...18238&an=0&page=1#Post8818238

nice fold Daut...

what doez the red X by some1 mean?

On January 20 2007 23:31 Bytewalker wrote: what doez the red X by some1 mean?

means don't listen to what they have to say.

No it means they cant write in the high stakes forum at all

this is no doubt the funniest thread on lp.net. I love forums :D

On January 21 2007 10:33 Roman wrote: this is no doubt the funniest thread on lp.net. I love forums :D

i get a ton of pleasure in opening a thread and seeing red x's everywhere

i hope more low stakes players post in here just so i can see more x's

not sure if BBM should get a red X tho, the rest are fine

I'm sorry for assuming that prominent high stakes players play their hands well ... I really think Hotmark butchered his hand here (and I did not read any of the 2+2 discussion prior to making my post, or even any replies here).

To quote Fsuplayer from 2+2, now that I've read that thread:


"yeah, i dont like either players line's here.

hotmark, that flop 3 bet is brutal. is it ever not a set? "

That's how I felt right away about this

so bbm you first come in and say how you think its a ridiculous fold
and now you are saying you felt right away his line is never not a set lol

On January 22 2007 17:56 Daut wrote: so bbm you first come in and say how you think its a ridiculous fold and now you are saying you felt right away his line is never not a set lol

LOL owned

No, I think his line looks like it's never not a set, and that's why it's a good line for a bluff and bad with a set.

Are you saying (and read the next sentence slowly and carefully) that you considered that he wondered about whether you realize that his bet looks so much like a set, that it reasonably shouldn't be ojne, and are willing to give action lighter in this spot, thinks that you do, and adjusts by value betting in the manner that he did?

Because I don't see what other thought process you can have here when you fold this set, and that line of thought gives way too much credit to hotmark IMO.

Or maybe your line of logic is that based on previous history and his image, he knows he has no folding equity in this spot, but to think that, seems like a stretch to me.

5th level thinking > 4th level thinking ~_~

Despite the fact that he was right, and his opponents play was hugely indicitive of a monster, this fold is wrong 99.50% of the time. There are literally 2 hands that can beat you.

Against this guy though, you can fold, and laugh at him for playing like a fish. He is not they type to spew here, the pot hardly looks like it can be stolen, and his range here is pretty much exactly 101010 and 555. His line is almost so rediculously bad that is has to be a bluff; but you must remember that when you remove the impossible, what remains, no matter how improbable, must be true. Since it is almost impossible that he is bluffing, he must infact have what he is representing.

Against this guy, assuming he had his normal game one, this fold is actually good, but DO NOT TAKE THIS TO HEART. You do not need to make this fold to beat 25/50 online and making it can cost you alot of real and skalansky dollars. Be very careful about what you learn from this post.

Anyway... nice fold... it's not a once in a life time thing, but it's a once a decade thing for me ;0

Yes, Ryan, be very, very careful about what you learn from his post.

tempted to ban just from who he was on sc

this is a very poorly played hand of poker.

On January 23 2007 07:58 BestZergOnEast wrote: Despite the fact that he was right, and his opponents play was hugely indicitive of a monster, this fold is wrong 99.50% of the time. There are literally 2 hands that can beat you. Against this guy though, you can fold, and laugh at him for playing like a fish. He is not they type to spew here, the pot hardly looks like it can be stolen, and his range here is pretty much exactly 101010 and 555. His line is almost so rediculously bad that is has to be a bluff; but you must remember that when you remove the impossible, what remains, no matter how improbable, must be true. Since it is almost impossible that he is bluffing, he must infact have what he is representing. Against this guy, assuming he had his normal game one, this fold is actually good, but DO NOT TAKE THIS TO HEART. You do not need to make this fold to beat 25/50 online and making it can cost you alot of real and skalansky dollars. Be very careful about what you learn from this post. Anyway... nice fold... it's not a once in a life time thing, but it's a once a decade thing for me ;0

Be very careful about what you learn from this post? Theres nothing to learn you contradicted yourself 10 times back and forth.

lol is that seriously 40yrsoldvirgin from clan x17

lmaoooooooooooooooooooo

cant count how many times he told me poker is all luck blah blah blah etc. etc.

who is he?

On January 23 2007 19:48 Roman wrote: this is a very poorly played hand of poker.

i agree
i totally hate my line. i also hate check calling and donking the turn. i guess lead flop or check call check turn are my best bets. fortunately for me he had a set here and those lines give me much less of a chance to fold while this one identifies his hand really well.