FR NL200 - Stupid bluff?

http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/807865

Villain is a classic FR nit, not much to say really. Didn't use stats on him, so its pointless to give them to you. I can say that I'm playing rush and had <150 hands on him. I felt like I had a good shot to take it down on the turn when I bet, but when I got called I still felt his range was too weak to call a barrell on turn. Is this bluff bad, and if so why.

1. Because "if he calls turn he calls that river aswell".
2. Beacuse you be too small.
3. You represent exactly nothing.
4. [insert alternative reason]

i dont think you rep very much after checking the flop, which is why he called you down OR hes not your average fr nit and your read is wrong.

You're right in that my read was wrong, but at the time he seemed like a standard nit so I'd like comments to be based on that.

What I dont understand is if this hand is one of those "if he calls on turn he will call river" because I think I can have a lot of hands that he cant and I think that with air in this spot most people (including me) will not fire the river on that card.

Maybe its just me who refuse to accept that a person who openlimp will be able to read that I rep very thin.

lol check him on pokertableratings and end this discussion, why do u think he is a fr nit when he is a standard fish?

Mierzwix, I dont have time to check on TR while playing 4 tables rush and I dont get anything from using facts I didnt have at the time of my decision to come to a conclusion about what the correct play is. But thanks anyway for checking him out for me, and for reminding me to actually try to use that site more. :D

lol nice value bet btw

I dont think its a good idea bluffing in a 5 way like this >.> , especially if you check the flop

On March 12 2010 14:57 k4ir0s wrote: I dont think its a good idea bluffing in a 5 way like this >.> , especially if you check the flop

yea i think this.

I like it a lot more because it's 5 way, but I'd probably only continue a high % if the fd hits.