NL100 - TPGK turn play 3-bet pot

hello. villain seems to be a reg playing 14/9 after ~500 hands. he folds to 3-bet 50% and folds to flop cbet 50%, thats all the stats/reads i have on him. i havent played a big pot with him or seen him do anything stupid so far.


Submitted by : cantonaa

** Spel-ID 3124160762 starting - 2010-02-02 14:06:43
** Seville 2 [Holdem] (0.50|1 NL - Cash Game) Real Money
WhyRuSmiling sitting in seat 1 with €100.00
abandono sitting in seat 2 with €398.11
gambit2k sitting in seat 3 with €114.68[Dealer]
Hero sitting in seat 4 with €100.50
bluff_my_72s sitting in seat 5 with €100.00
habibifred sitting in seat 6 with €33.70
Hero lade lilla mörken - €0.50
bluff_my_72s lade stora mörken - €1.00

Holecards
   
habibifred folded
WhyRuSmiling folded
abandono folded
gambit2k raised to €3.00
Hero raised to €11.00
bluff_my_72s folded
gambit2k called - €11.00

Flop (Pot : $22.00)

   
Hero bet - €13.50
gambit2k called - €13.50

Turn (Pot : $49.00)

   
Hero

he calls/raises 50% of 3bets? most regs would be folding 80% of 3bets. So i guess you can get it in, but you should prob flat unless your comfortable 3betting next time.

Flat preflop against the 14/9. As played bet again

bet bet bet is the standard line i believe.

yeah, that sounds good. thx for the answers

your reads dont seem great for a 3bet. Flat prf.

14/9? i guess bet bet bet, i think this is a money losing situation now cuz you're going to run into AK/sets more often rather then get paid by AJ and stubborn pp's. River bet might be too thin imo on a K/6/J.

To avoid situations like this, dun 3 bet AQ oop without history. There's little value to 3 betting AQ @ a 14/9 villain without history.

Bet and prey he doesn't play back at you.

well
villian dosnt have AJ.. soo.. gl with that

I find myself in this kind of situation from time to time and I hate it. I know, I know.."if you aren't comfortable doing it, don't do it".
Is betting all three streets the most optimal way of playing this hand?.... The only reasonable hand you are beating is AJ.
But can villain really hold AJ here?

From my past experience, I often find the villain with AQ minimum for chop or lose to AK and sets.
If someone can step in and share their insight on this hand, it would be much appreciated.

On February 05 2010 00:22 TalentedTom wrote: well villian dosnt have AJ.. soo.. gl with that

hahahahaha

On February 05 2010 00:45 Arirang wrote: I find myself in this kind of situation from time to time and I hate it. I know, I know.."if you aren't comfortable doing it, don't do it". Is betting all three streets the most optimal way of playing this hand?.... The only reasonable hand you are beating is AJ. But can villain really hold AJ here? From my past experience, I often find the villain with AQ minimum for chop or lose to AK and sets. If someone can step in and share their insight on this hand, it would be much appreciated.

if thats the case you shouldnt be 3betting AQ.

unless hes setmining all his pocket pairs.