Isildur vs Ziigmund

On November 30 2009 16:38 DarkDevildog wrote: Ziggy is up 2 mill today & isildur is down 2.65 mill as of right now. Why is nobody getting this match! I would but I'm in some stupid government networking class today..

omg 2.6M?

WTF

On November 30 2009 17:08 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On November 30 2009 16:38 DarkDevildog wrote: Ziggy is up 2 mill today & isildur is down 2.65 mill as of right now. Why is nobody getting this match! I would but I'm in some stupid government networking class today.. omg 2.6M?

2.6 mirrion
+ Show Spoiler +

Apparently the guy has no clud how to play Omaha. Heh he lost 5 million pretty much all or most of it in PLO i think...

http://www.pokertableratings.com/blog/2009/12/isildur1-loses-2-7-million/

With hands included. -2.7m day ouch

sick comeback by Townsend from 2007

isn't isil running multiple millions below EV in omaha and ppl on european sites have all said he is actually really good at omaha?

On December 01 2009 20:25 palak wrote: isn't isil running multiple millions below EV in omaha and ppl on european sites have all said he is actually really good at omaha?

garph?

On December 02 2009 01:58 WastedGate wrote: Show nested quote + On December 01 2009 20:25 palak wrote: isn't isil running multiple millions below EV in omaha and ppl on european sites have all said he is actually really good at omaha? garph?

from an earlier thread



that was as of a week ago, PA vs isl with PA 2ish mil above EV.

On December 02 2009 03:23 palak wrote: ]http://www.liquidpoker.net/user_pictures/1a2f9.PA isil.jpg

holy shitttttttt

wow sick O_O

ohh that graph is so sick

isildur is really crushing him in non showdowns

run goot..

what? according to the graph he's a bloody luckbox and is losing on non-showdown pots

On December 02 2009 14:41 Night[Mare] wrote: what? according to the graph he's a bloody luckbox and is losing on non-showdown pots

That is PA's graph. (says vs Isildur on top)

I don't understand poker at all but to me it's not necessarily a luckbox. If Isildur is paying off too much then you have the same graph and it's just a mistake from Isildur that causes it. Shoving into the nuts regularly is the same as paying off even if you win a non-showdown pot from time to time.

On December 03 2009 14:41 Fudyann wrote: I don't understand poker at all but to me it's not necessarily a luckbox. If Isildur is paying off too much then you have the same graph and it's just a mistake from Isildur that causes it. Shoving into the nuts regularly is the same as paying off even if you win a non-showdown pot from time to time.

ok

On December 03 2009 14:41 Fudyann wrote: I don't understand poker at all but to me it's not necessarily a luckbox. If Isildur is paying off too much then you have the same graph and it's just a mistake from Isildur that causes it. Shoving into the nuts regularly is the same as paying off even if you win a non-showdown pot from time to time.

Quit at 6 words imo

On December 03 2009 14:41 Fudyann wrote: I don't understand poker at all but to me it's not necessarily a luckbox. If Isildur is paying off too much then you have the same graph and it's just a mistake from Isildur that causes it. Shoving into the nuts regularly is the same as paying off even if you win a non-showdown pot from time to time.

we arn't saying luckbox because PA is down a fuckton w/o showdown. We are saying luckbox because PA is 2.5mil above ev.

you guys dont expect anyone to actually have a winning redline vs isildur right? only way to beat him is with the other line (unless a huge monster would show up that would out-monkey isildur somehow zomg!)

On December 03 2009 16:45 TheGuru wrote: Show nested quote + On December 03 2009 14:41 Fudyann wrote: I don't understand poker at all but to me it's not necessarily a luckbox. If Isildur is paying off too much then you have the same graph and it's just a mistake from Isildur that causes it. Shoving into the nuts regularly is the same as paying off even if you win a non-showdown pot from time to time. Quit at 6 words imo