[NL10]fold set?

Submitted by : sammejao

** Hand # 2297239421 starting - 2008-12-04 02:43:15
** Flying Kites [Hold 'em] (0.05|0.10 NL - Cash Game) Real Money
Dive_This sitting in seat 1 with $8.15
KINGBADBOB sitting in seat 2 with $12.15
Bill1127 sitting in seat 3 with $9.81[Dealer]
pablo_eskoba sitting in seat 4 with $10.22
arguy_75 sitting in seat 5 with $10.59
Hero sitting in seat 6 with $10.00
arguy_75 posted the small blind - $0.05
Hero posted the big blind - $0.10

Holecards
   
Dive_This called - $0.10
KINGBADBOB folded
Bill1127 called - $0.10
arguy_75 folded
Hero checked

Flop (Pot : $0.35)

   
Hero bet - $0.35
Dive_This folded
Bill1127 called - $0.35

Turn (Pot : $1.05)

   
Hero bet - $0.70
Bill1127 raised to $1.40
Hero called - $1.40

River (Pot : $3.85)

   
arguy_75 > yeah ok.*g dumb bob
Hero checked
Bill1127 bet - $3.85

Yeah he often does have a flush here.

Call anyway.

Yeah fold, cause weird hands with 4s in them got there too, this is a limped pot. Calling isn't really that big of a mistake though...

splitted opinions I dont really like to call here.. without reads atleast

Ummm, actually, the more I think about it, he could be getting really excited about AT. That river sucks though, because there are random SC 4s in his range. I think you should expect to almost break even on a call here, but it's not a really profitable spot to be sure. If you've never seen him bluff, then I'd just fold and save myself the variance.

On December 03 2008 20:48 Sicks Macks wrote: Ummm, actually, the more I think about it, he could be getting really excited about AT. That river sucks though, because there are random SC 4s in his range. I think you should expect to almost break even on a call here, but it's not a really profitable spot to be sure. If you've never seen him bluff, then I'd just fold and save myself the variance.

Nit

Saying that to a 6max player makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

On December 03 2008 20:52 edzwoo wrote: Show nested quote + On December 03 2008 20:48 Sicks Macks wrote: Ummm, actually, the more I think about it, he could be getting really excited about AT. That river sucks though, because there are random SC 4s in his range. I think you should expect to almost break even on a call here, but it's not a really profitable spot to be sure. If you've never seen him bluff, then I'd just fold and save myself the variance. Nit

My aggression frequencies by situation:

4bet pot, top set, monotone: 1000000
3bet pot: 8
Bars: 6
Raised pot: 4
Limped pot: 0.5
Funerals: 0.3
3 Flush, 4 straight boards with 59 VPIP players minraising turn and potting river: N/A (I fold)

only hand you are realistically beating is a10. that said, I think this is an easy fold.

YES FOLD SET

On December 03 2008 21:38 Sicks Macks wrote: Show nested quote + On December 03 2008 20:52 edzwoo wrote:   On December 03 2008 20:48 Sicks Macks wrote: Ummm, actually, the more I think about it, he could be getting really excited about AT. That river sucks though, because there are random SC 4s in his range. I think you should expect to almost break even on a call here, but it's not a really profitable spot to be sure. If you've never seen him bluff, then I'd just fold and save myself the variance. Nit My aggression frequencies by situation: 4bet pot, top set, monotone: 1000000 3bet pot: 8 Bars: 6 Raised pot: 4 Limped pot: 0.5 Funerals: 0.3 3 Flush, 4 straight boards with 59 VPIP players minraising turn and potting river: N/A (I fold)

If you play 16/13 then obv your aggression will be higher considering you play a stronger handrange than most

raise turn and then you can figure out whether or not to fold there?

On December 04 2008 03:06 RICHI8 wrote: raise turn and then you can figure out whether or not to fold there?

horrible idea bro

I agree with the majority of the people. He most likely hit his flush, so I would fold. He limped the button, so I really doubt he has Ax (wouldn't people raise here most of the time?). So I would put him on a suited connector.