[200NL] Boat on River

This was such a strange hand, the dude is kinda loose but never seen him overbet the pot, he instant bet that too on the river. Kinda wondering how you guys would play since since were 200BB deep. Reason why i cheked the turn because i was going to reraise the river but he overbet, so i said to myself WTF

Submitted by : mrpav.com

PokerStars Game #20965327221: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2008/10/06 0:29:16 ET
Table 'Delia II' 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: andru67 ($199 in chips)
Seat 2: jltheboom ($196.20 in chips)
Seat 3: timbgood ($397.20 in chips)
Seat 4: ==PAV== ($411.40 in chips)
Seat 5: iplaysoccer6 ($440.65 in chips)
Seat 6: snap_c ($255.10 in chips)
==PAV== : posts small blind $1
iplaysoccer6: posts big blind $2

Holecards
Dealt to ==PAV==
snap_c: folds
andru67: folds
jltheboom: folds
timbgood: calls $2
==PAV== : calls $1
iplaysoccer6: checks

Flop (Pot : $6.00)

   
==PAV== : bets $6
iplaysoccer6: folds
timbgood: calls $6

Turn (Pot : $18.00)

   
==PAV== : bets $16
timbgood: raises $16 to $32
==PAV== : calls $16

River (Pot : $82.00)

   
==PAV== : checks
timbgood: bets $152
==PAV== : ?

i think reshoving with this information (no specific reads on when he overbets) will make you money in the long run. you'll make money against 22, A10, maybe.. K10, some 88 and some Qc9c and lose some to J10. think JJ is almost nonexistant here.

I flat all day

his hand looks like JT or a bluff

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

9 games 0.005 secs 1,800 games/sec

Board: 2s Th 8c Jc Ts
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 55.556% 44.44% 11.11% 4 1.00 { Tc8s }
Hand 1: 44.444% 33.33% 11.11% 3 1.00 { 88, 22, JTs, T8s, JTo, T8o }

i guess it's a shove if you always get called by 22, you might get called by Q9 too

I Shove

On October 06 2008 10:27 Yugless wrote: Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 9 games 0.005 secs 1,800 games/sec Board: 2s Th 8c Jc Ts Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 55.556% 44.44% 11.11% 4 1.00 { Tc8s } Hand 1: 44.444% 33.33% 11.11% 3 1.00 { 88, 22, JTs, T8s, JTo, T8o } i guess it's a shove if you always get called by 22, you might get called by Q9 too

I would prob take out T8s and t8s out of that, and repleace it with K10 and A10

Does he often limp on the button?

On October 06 2008 10:27 nicksson wrote: I Shove

not folding. jc can't be right.

On October 06 2008 10:27 nicksson wrote: I Shove

and fold pf

I call cuz folding full houses is gay, but I do expect to see JT fairly often here. Bluff or other TX other times too. Shoving is high variance play that is marginal at best. Simply because you are likely to only get called by a flopped monster such as set of 2s, which does not necessarily fit his line. In summary, call.

i shove and i don't really think it's thin

and i don't fold preflop either

yea wtf tim gammmbollll you dumb nit.

Shove, although it feels kinda thin to me

Calling can't be that big of a mistake

I expect him to shows up with 97 alot after his turn min raise and flop call.

On October 06 2008 10:27 Yugless wrote: Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 9 games 0.005 secs 1,800 games/sec Board: 2s Th 8c Jc Ts Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 55.556% 44.44% 11.11% 4 1.00 { Tc8s } Hand 1: 44.444% 33.33% 11.11% 3 1.00 { 88, 22, JTs, T8s, JTo, T8o } i guess it's a shove if you always get called by 22, you might get called by Q9 too

given the law of full houses hes never folding 22 here

On October 07 2008 09:49 TalentedTom wrote: Show nested quote + On October 06 2008 10:27 Yugless wrote: Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 9 games 0.005 secs 1,800 games/sec Board: 2s Th 8c Jc Ts Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 55.556% 44.44% 11.11% 4 1.00 { Tc8s } Hand 1: 44.444% 33.33% 11.11% 3 1.00 { 88, 22, JTs, T8s, JTo, T8o } i guess it's a shove if you always get called by 22, you might get called by Q9 too given the law of full houses hes never folding 22 here

"zeebo theorem"

I jam and pwn his 222