200nl blind batttle check

villain is some TAG reg. high steal %, i feel good about this
Submitted by : piratematerial

PokerStars Game #20228680624: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2008/09/07 18:11:39 ET
Table 'Gormeisa' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: titko23 ($274.50 in chips)
Seat 2: pokerhaasje ($200 in chips)
Seat 3: ZeGrimReaper ($326.35 in chips)
Seat 4: playits8fe ($69.90 in chips)
Seat 5: MistTheFlop ($37 in chips)
Seat 6: HerrPferd ($239.95 in chips)
titko23: posts small blind $1
pokerhaasje : posts big blind $2

Holecards
Dealt to pokerhaasje
ZeGrimReaper: folds
playits8fe: folds
MistTheFlop: folds
HerrPferd: raises $6 to $8
titko23: folds
pokerhaasje : raises $20 to $28
HerrPferd: calls $20

Flop (Pot : $57.00)

   
pokerhaasje : bets $40
HerrPferd: raises $171.95 to $211.95 and is all-in

calllllllllll

if you 3bet KJ (which is perfectly fine) you have to call this, i dont see you beating much but he def doesnt have to have a monster so you're clearly priced in.

anyone rather check flop?

check the Flop a lot
this isn't a blind battle

On September 07 2008 19:17 sOah wrote: check the Flop a lot this isn't a blind battle

Check with the intention of doing what?

I'd bet/call this anyway, he can raise with a lot of draws here including JT, QJ and flushdraws which you all beat.

bet/call, check/call and check/raise are all viable - I would probably opt to check-call this more often than the others without a good reason not to because when behind you are seeing a Turn as cheap as possible and in general there are very few bad Turn cards you need to protect from, etc.