1
 |
napalm   Poland. Aug 12 2008 10:49. Posts 171 | | | |
|
| | Last edit: 12/08/2008 10:52 |
|
|
1
 |
taqtiX   Iceland. Aug 12 2008 11:21. Posts 338 | | |
hate the CC pre; throws your hand face up. Might as well 4bet pre and rep a bluff / AK.
As played; don't see what you can do other than bet there. |
|
| Im not much for cards but I think these .45s beat a full house | |
|
|
1
 |
napalm   Poland. Aug 12 2008 11:43. Posts 171 | | |
well i will take it down preflop roughly 50% of the time, and other 50% is getting it in with 40% equity against their range so |
|
|
1
 |
napalm   Poland. Aug 12 2008 11:49. Posts 171 | | |
i could do some math later but i think 4beting getting it in here is -ev |
|
|
1
 |
DooMeR   United States. Aug 12 2008 13:12. Posts 8564 | | |
eh. I'm not exactly sure. my initial reaction was 4bet but its SB vs HJ 3bet, so its not that light. But flatting sort of blows. :|
id like to hear other opinions. I think both options are meh T_T but im still sort of leaning towards 4bet |
|
| I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance, by running away from the scene of an accident. | |
|
|
4
 |
PoorUser   United States. Aug 12 2008 13:16. Posts 7472 | | |
| | On August 12 2008 10:49 napalm wrote:
i could do some math later but i think 4beting getting it in here is -ev |
this 100% cant be true |
| |
|
|
1
 |
Med.Stud   Sweden. Aug 12 2008 13:35. Posts 65 | | |
4-bet
makes it simple!
I can tell you its +ev to 4-bet
and "possibly" you could add 0,2-2% extra equity by calling and then playing the hand optimally postflop. The thing is you don't play the hand optimally postflop!
Thus, make the easy +ev push instead of the complicated possibly abit more +ev call.
EDIT: One more thing. If your up against regulars, you don't want them to think that you only push AA and KK here, so if they call its good for your table image!
Good luck |
|
| | Last edit: 12/08/2008 14:28 |
|
|
1
 |
napalm   Poland. Aug 12 2008 14:42. Posts 171 | | |
Ok, then i can 4b/get it in with AK aswell? what about jacks? |
|
|
1
| |
I dont mind your flat pre. But i think you should check this flop because your range for checking this situation is far larger then leading. |
|
|
4
|
1
| |
| | On August 12 2008 13:57 casinocasino wrote:
But i think you should check this flop because your range for checking this situation is far larger then leading. |
Thats good, point for You |
|
|
1
| |
it's situations like this that makes me cold 4betbluff like 46o and show sometimes just so that I can 4 bet/call QQ here. And I agree with you that if they consider you non-spewy they're never getting it in here with worse pairs. Porky is pretty good and the other dude, while not amazing, is far from retarded. |
|
|
1
 |
TwistedEcho   United Kingdom. Aug 25 2008 17:37. Posts 3539 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
 |
Fraser   Canada. Aug 25 2008 18:17. Posts 4605 | | |
| | On August 12 2008 13:57 casinocasino wrote:
I dont mind your flat pre. But i think you should check this flop because your range for checking this situation is far larger then leading. |
so.. with 67s in this spot, flat pf, lead flop 1/2 pot? nh? |
|
|
|