$10/$20 with a set on dry board.

I folded

Thought I was playing my super A game too

On February 14 2012 06:13 JonnyCosMo wrote: Thought I was playing my super A game too

meaning you folded and villain won the pot with 109s v fish?

with TT/99

From a live play perspective, do you think it makes a difference if he timed on turn and then shoved instead of timing on flop before putting in the last $30? The only thing I can think of is villain potentially trying to drive us out on flop with a hand like JQhh to flip with the fishs' range and he figures you cant possibly put him on a bluff on turn jamming into a dry sidepot

On February 14 2012 12:43 gawdawaful wrote: From a live play perspective, do you think it makes a difference if he timed on turn and then shoved instead of timing on flop before putting in the last $30? The only thing I can think of is villain potentially trying to drive us out on flop with a hand like JQhh to flip with the fishs' range and he figures you cant possibly put him on a bluff on turn jamming into a dry sidepot

I feel like I'm getting trolled by someone whos in LA right now. Villan had exactly QJhh in the hand. And most of the time I don't think his timing makes all that much of a difference unless they instantly do an action. If Villan waits 10 seconds or 10 minutes, it usually can mean the same thing. Instant actions are different, they are pre-planned with some kind of reason behind them that is usually easy to figure out. You see fish do instant actions in spots where they have strong hands because they are scared of what cards can come and they secretly would rather you fold than call and suck out.

On February 12 2012 21:18 rememp wrote: Show nested quote + On February 12 2012 20:28 player999 wrote: why would he shove 77/88/J9/QJ/JT/JJ/98 on an empty side pot wtf? You are way better than me. Thus I yield to your opinion. Does this mean he shoves Q10 and 109? Or did you just forget to add those in? My thought process was that he wants to defend all those hands against Johnny and take the sizable pot against what he perceives as likely a much weaker hand. I mean he knows Johnny isn't in there with nothing. Explain to me please : )

Does this mean I was right? Or is he still showing up with 78s, 109s way more often? I don't want to be results oriented but I want to know if my thought process was in fact correct.

yes but you incorrectly included hands that cant beat the fish's

On February 14 2012 16:11 player999 wrote: yes but you incorrectly included hands that cant beat the fish's

kk thanks

On February 14 2012 06:12 JonnyCosMo wrote: I folded

i don't understand why you wouldn't just fold the flop if you're going to fold the turn...?

On February 14 2012 19:42 TimDawg wrote: Show nested quote + On February 14 2012 06:12 JonnyCosMo wrote: I folded i don't understand why you wouldn't just fold the flop if you're going to fold the turn...?

Truuuuust me when I say that wasnt the original plan. There were other things that went into me folding lol...

On February 15 2012 17:50 JonnyCosMo wrote: Show nested quote + On February 14 2012 19:42 TimDawg wrote:   On February 14 2012 06:12 JonnyCosMo wrote: I folded i don't understand why you wouldn't just fold the flop if you're going to fold the turn...? Truuuuust me when I say that wasnt the original plan. There were other things that went into me folding lol...

Lol been there, done that

Self owning yourself for whatever reasons is much worse live

So i thought I was soul reading.... then....

But did he hit ?

On February 16 2012 16:23 kingpowa wrote: But did he hit ?

Yes he hit a King, pro fold imo

wow must been pretty tilting, did you keep playing? what was the result of this session?

not tilting at all when the guy hits the river

On February 18 2012 06:45 player999 wrote: not tilting at all when the guy hits the river

Truuuuuui

On February 18 2012 02:33 casinocasino wrote: wow must been pretty tilting, did you keep playing? what was the result of this session?

Pretty much snap quit :-p