Show hand : 783618

Handnr: 783618
Submitted by : RICHI8

PokerStars Game #37372735099: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2009/12/29 14:28:06 PT [2009/12/29 17:28:06 ET]
Table Mannucci X 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: MacXone ($426.10 in chips)
Seat 2: roda84 ($144.35 in chips)
Seat 3: Hero ($212.30 in chips)
Seat 4: Parasurama ($228.05 in chips)
Seat 5: Sexy 0wL ($100 in chips)
Seat 6: Slottinho ($109.50 in chips)
roda84: posts small blind $0.50
Hero: posts big blind $1

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero
Parasurama: folds
Sexy 0wL: folds
Slottinho: folds
MacXone: folds
roda84: raises $2 to $3
Hero: raises $7 to $10
roda84: calls $7

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $20.00)

   
roda84: checks
Hero: bets $12
roda84: calls $12

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $44.00)

   
roda84: checks
Hero: bets $26
roda84: raises $96.35 to $122.35 and is all-in
Hero: calls $96.35

River (Pot : $288.70)

   

Showdown
roda84: shows (three of a kind, Threes)
Hero: shows (a pair of Kings)
roda84 collected $285.70 from pot

Summary
Total pot $288.70 | Rake $3
Board  
Seat 1: MacXone (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: roda84 (small blind) showed and won ($285.70) with three of a kind, Threes
Seat 3: Hero (big blind) showed and lost with a pair of Kings
Seat 4: Parasurama folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: Sexy 0wL folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: Slottinho folded before Flop (didnt bet)

Comments

RICHI8   United States. Dec 29 2009 17:30. Posts 1341 fold this too right?

LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Dec 29 2009 17:37. Posts 15163 Stats? Bitches be crazy man, I don't fold without reads 93% Sure!

Naib   Hungary. Dec 29 2009 17:40. Posts 968 I would fold turn and feel angry, (but I play below this limit so...this situation happens too often and it's a set sooo many times. He's not a fish afterall) but bet a bit more? Like 30-32? Betting 26 into 44 just looks super weak imo, someone who is a thinking player could shove worse if he catches on to your weakness. My favourite line is Bet/Fold. I bet, you fold.

LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Dec 29 2009 17:41. Posts 15163 Oh wait we are deep I didn't see that changes the hand a ton A) you have to 3bet more for obvious fundamental reasons B) As Naib said very correctly you have to put a couple more bucks more in the pot on both streets as you will have 100% of the pot left on the river and you are losing value if you think you aren't getting more than 2 streets of value C) with your 3bet sizing and the fact that we are 144bb effective this actually makes it a fold against TAG and tight villains. 93% Sure! Last edit: 29/12/2009 17:50

hellokittery   United States. Dec 29 2009 17:47. Posts 1399 some regs spazz out like huge morons bvb so you really need a read here

PoorUser    United States. Dec 29 2009 17:50. Posts 7471 the last time this was a fold was never Gambler Emeritus

LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Dec 29 2009 17:53. Posts 15163   On December 29 2009 16:50 PoorUser wrote: the last time this was a fold was never Lets say he is a standard nitty NL100 tag 19/17 30% steal 70% fold to 3bet, we never saw him get out of line. Do you really think he would bluff using this line 144 bb deep more than 31% of the time? Lets say he would call all Kx and Ax backoored fds 93% Sure! Last edit: 29/12/2009 17:58

All hands submitted by RICHI8: