Villain @ 19/7/1.6 over 42 hands . Here I figured 88-QQ were definite possibilities for this guy and that he'd stack off with all of em... cooler or bad shove?
PokerStars Game #16320767124: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2008/03/28 - 19:25:56 (ET)
Table 'Meges II' 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 2: AlbatrossJR ($85.90 in chips)
Seat 3: TomDJx ($58.15 in chips)
Seat 4: Sander20 ($47.10 in chips)
Seat 5: k2o4 ($65.15 in chips)
Seat 6: D_Bowe_Show ($8.75 in chips)
Sander20: posts small blind $0.25
k2o4 : posts big blind $0.50
Showdown k2o4 : shows (a pair of Kings)
AlbatrossJR: shows (three of a kind, Fives)
AlbatrossJR collected $133.30 from pot
Summary Total pot $135.30 | Rake $2
Board
Seat 2: AlbatrossJR showed and won ($133.30) with three of a kind, Fives
Seat 3: TomDJx (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: Sander20 (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 5: k2o4 (big blind) showed and lost with a pair of Kings
Seat 6: D_Bowe_Show folded before Flop
I snapfold flop raise
this is the reason you mustn't limp call with small pocket pairs,sets are so obvious
his stats also make it too easy
again,he limped utg+1 with a limper ahead of him and he is a nit=fold on such a flop
best case scenario he has 44 or 88 but a 1.6 AF guy doesn't play these fast that often
You already know these stuff man
new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man...
(three of a kind, Fives)
