Show hand : 295616

Handnr: 295616
Submitted by : Pillars

PokerStars Game #12655050998: Hold'em No Limit ($3/$6) - 2007/10/16 - 01:33:02 (ET)
Table 'Handahl III' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: technologic ($1511.65 in chips)
Seat 2: marat1969 ($724.80 in chips)
Seat 3: crapface82 ($612.90 in chips)
Seat 5: Pillars ($968.85 in chips)
Seat 6: Bri-c ($848.50 in chips)
technologic: posts small blind $3
marat1969: posts big blind $6

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Pillars
crapface82: raises $12 to $18
Pillars : calls $18
Bri-c: folds
technologic: raises $66 to $84
marat1969: folds
crapface82: calls $66
Pillars : calls $66

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $258.00)

   
technologic: checks
kifroune joins the table at seat #4
crapface82: checks
Pillars : checks

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $258.00)

   
technologic: bets $200
crapface82: folds
Pillars : raises $400 to $600
technologic: raises $400 to $1000
Pillars : calls $284.85 and is all-in

River (Pot : $2,027.70)

   

Showdown
technologic: shows (a pair of Queens)
Pillars : mucks hand
technologic collected $2025.70 from pot

Summary
Total pot $2027.70 | Rake $2
Board  
Seat 1: technologic (small blind) showed and won ($2025.70) with a pair of Queens
Seat 2: marat1969 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: crapface82 folded on the Turn
Seat 5: Pillars mucked
Seat 6: Bri-c (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Comments

Pillars   United States. Oct 15 2007 23:42. Posts 1049 Anyone like this?

FrEaK[S.sIR]   Canada. Oct 15 2007 23:45. Posts 1848 You never on msn

royalsu   Canada. Oct 15 2007 23:49. Posts 3233 damn that's a tricky, risky way to play QQ

Pillars   United States. Oct 15 2007 23:50. Posts 1049 I mostly used MSN at work, but I left my job a few months ago. I'll probably start trying to get on a bit more consistently next month.

Pillars   United States. Oct 15 2007 23:51. Posts 1049   On October 15 2007 22:49 royalsu wrote: damn that's a tricky, risky way to play QQ I just don't see how he managed to hang on to QQ here given how deep we were.

FrEaK[S.sIR]   Canada. Oct 16 2007 00:03. Posts 1848 Okie, you were always a pleasure to talk to

Fayth    Canada. Oct 16 2007 00:10. Posts 10085 well it's not terrible considering you have outs if he has you beat, but i like it more to play this hand stricly for set value Im not sure what to do tomorrow when I see her, should I shake her hand?? -Floofy

Fayth    Canada. Oct 16 2007 00:10. Posts 10085 all about variance Im not sure what to do tomorrow when I see her, should I shake her hand?? -Floofy

Pillars   United States. Oct 16 2007 13:26. Posts 1049   On October 15 2007 23:10 Fayth wrote: well it's not terrible considering you have outs if he has you beat, but i like it more to play this hand stricly for set value Most of the time I'm playing this exclusively for set value. I thought an interesting situation arose on the turn, however. I'm expecting he *does* have me beat a good portion of the time on the turn, but I'm also expecting that he'll be able to find a fold with a hand like QQ or JJ a decent percentage of the time given that we're 160BB deep. 66, 89s, TT are all very much in my range at this point. He pretty much has to hope I'm semi-bluffing on the turn here as I'm not raising for value against his range with a hand that loses to QQ.

All hands submitted by Pillars: