NL400 AA vs river shove - Page 2

twisted, would you also fold this hand vs a reg? somewhat similar
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/842001

On September 07 2010 18:18 hellokittery wrote: twisted, would you also fold this hand vs a reg? somewhat similar http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/842001

Thats 5 handed against a min raise vs unknown 6max reg

I would fold here as well.

On September 08 2010 11:04 LemOn[5thF] wrote: Show nested quote + On September 07 2010 18:18 hellokittery wrote: twisted, would you also fold this hand vs a reg? somewhat similar http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/842001 Thats 5 handed against a min raise vs unknown 6max reg

c/minraise in this spot is even more disturbing

i feel good

On September 07 2010 18:18 hellokittery wrote: twisted, would you also fold this hand vs a reg? somewhat similar http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/842001

Generally when people use this line (call 3 times in position then shove river) I tend to think they always have it because how often does a 200NL regfish turn a hand into a bluff like that. Pretty much never. Seeing as he would never valueshove worse, I don't think folding in your hand is bad either, though it's harder than in OP's hand because there it's a clear cut fold, yours is pretty close cuz it's 5 handed and 6max an all.

I don't know, your hand is really under repped and he can easily shove a king here for value.

how is his hand underrepped? his hand looks like Kx or better

btw, thx for commenting on my hands twisted. always nice to hear your opinions

I seriously dont understand how people can think, that the guy raises a K for value here. Thats totally insane. He would have to float the flop with two overs, check call the turn for some reason and then decide instead to raise the river and expect us to call with something like TT+ at least.

Bet way bigger on river

On September 08 2010 21:51 TimDawg wrote: Bet way bigger on river

i bet smallish since i dont think a K is a big part of his range and wanted to get value out of hands like JJ/TT.

thoughts on this?