AA hand against tight player - Page 2

On August 31 2010 21:42 JSquids wrote: dont listen to any of these assholes here. reraise.

this is an nl10 FULLRING NITREG. raise is suicide.

fold bottom set

On September 01 2010 00:00 Venrae wrote: Show nested quote + On August 31 2010 21:42 JSquids wrote: dont listen to any of these assholes here. reraise. this is an nl10 FULLRING NITREG. raise is suicide.

you understand opponent pratically raised him all-in. if he is going w/ his aces here then its to shove (lol whats left like 1 dollar?)

but as said earlier, I fold this without crying to much about it.

Check turn because a 11/8 nit will have a pp here like 90% of the time and will not give you 3 streets of value with an unimproved pp

i would shove for info

On September 01 2010 08:28 T8Suited wrote: Check turn because a 11/8 nit will have a pp here like 90% of the time and will not give you 3 streets of value with an unimproved pp

do not check turn.

betting turn seems fine to me as well, I wouldn't call the XR though.

On September 01 2010 04:52 SpasticInk wrote: Show nested quote + On September 01 2010 00:00 Venrae wrote:   On August 31 2010 21:42 JSquids wrote: dont listen to any of these assholes here. reraise. this is an nl10 FULLRING NITREG. raise is suicide. you understand opponent pratically raised him all-in. if he is going w/ his aces here then its to shove (lol whats left like 1 dollar?) but as said earlier, I fold this without crying to much about it.

I missed that =[

I'm bad at sarcasm in advice threads

set sounds about right. Just fold...fast or slow...or medium speed...or fast.

On August 31 2010 18:03 zulu_nation8 wrote: he might have 89s/67s in his range if he's a good nit. Also 11/8 over 150 hands can become much looser over a larger sample, but yea if he can bluff/semi-bluff here he would be a pretty sick nit.

Good nit 3 bets those hands no?

not necessarily he could be 3betting broadways for value and call with SC hands which is probably bad for his nittiness, or he could 3bet only top value hands and Ax Kx off suit as bluffs. Hero would have to see him show something down to assume anything.

call and when he shoves river, then fully believe in his set and muck it.

best play overall imo.

snap fold, tight players never bluff, he has set %100 of the time

tight players only set mine, that's all, so fold

fold as fast as u can, he is never bluffing this turn! The 150 hand sample should have said enough, people dont bluff this turn with those stats

There's no way to tell what do do here without actual reads on this player-PT stats don't cut it.

If you've seen him act this way with over pairs- it's an auto call.

If you've seen him bully out looser players post flop- it's a maybe call.

The no read default play is to assume he has a set and fold.

Is this player playing back at your bullying of him? If so he could be doing this with much weaker hands than normal.

Don't believe stats too much, a lot of players can change gears and will be manipulating their table image to exploit you ( OK maybe not at this level).

On September 02 2010 18:01 Fox wrote: call and when he shoves river, then fully believe in his set and muck it. best play overall imo.

You're calling all but a dollar of your stack and folding when he river shoves? I think I'd rather just shove the extra dollar on the turn.

As played fold

or call because fuck that guy, spike ace on river.

imo he has AA too...

jk

lolfr

Check fold flop.

You want to learn to play exploitive poker, not optimal poker