https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 573 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 10:26

Clothes what

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Forum Index > General
BangYu   United States. Aug 24 2010 16:30. Posts 251

After wearing abercrombie since highschool, im trying to switch my style. Something to like express? I like a lot of their clothes but was wondering where do you guys shop. How much you drop on clothes.
And if any of you have any nice stores/sites that arent too expensive u like to shop at.


Facebook Twitter

dogmeat   Czech Republic. Aug 24 2010 16:37. Posts 6374

u srs?

poker players dont go out

ban baal 

Jubert69   United States. Aug 24 2010 16:53. Posts 3191

We can't answer this for you. All depends on who YOU are. Don't wear clothes because other people told you to.


albonycee   United States. Aug 24 2010 16:53. Posts 2749

http://www.revolveclothing.com/

(insert stupid shit)aments 

moonk379   United States. Aug 24 2010 16:55. Posts 355

I like h n m n

ill wit it 

terrybunny19240   United States. Aug 24 2010 16:59. Posts 13829

ummmmmmmmm i find american eagle to use good quality fabrics


qwerty67890   New Zealand. Aug 24 2010 17:00. Posts 14026


or


and



and


dogmeat   Czech Republic. Aug 24 2010 17:01. Posts 6374

id go for motorhead

ban baal 

gawdawaful   Canada. Aug 24 2010 17:15. Posts 9015

+ Show Spoiler +

Im only good at poker when I run goodLast edit: 24/08/2010 17:16

BigRed0000    United States. Aug 24 2010 17:19. Posts 3554

paging Vital[Myth].

seriously one of the most fashionable dudes I know (no homo).

 Last edit: 24/08/2010 17:20

Jamie217   Canada. Aug 24 2010 17:21. Posts 4351

loooool at the comments in that wolf shirt


ggplz   Sweden. Aug 24 2010 17:43. Posts 16784

Buy clothes you like... its really that easy. Shirts&Blazers will look smart. Ties can look ok if you're a trim/goofy looking motherfucker or work in an office. T-shirts are obv more casual. Shorts casual. Jeans or Pants as you American heroes call them generally look smart/casual. Just look at stuff you like online or go to a store and check out clothes in person. You dont have to buy anything there if u dont like it. I hate going to stores and fucking about though so i usually look at stuff online then order it or pick similar stuff up i like when i see it.

if poker is dangerous to them i would rank sports betting as a Kodiak grizzly bear who smells blood after you just threw a javelin into his cub - RaiNKhANLast edit: 24/08/2010 18:12

bigredhoss   Cook Islands. Aug 24 2010 18:03. Posts 8649


  On August 24 2010 16:21 Jamie217 wrote:
loooool at the comments in that wolf shirt



+1 lol

Truck-Crash Life 

NighTLesS15   United States. Aug 24 2010 18:17. Posts 241

i'm still laughing that you admitted you wear abercrombie haha

Frinkx: 1k on mario cart? PoorUser: Snap call  

CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 24 2010 18:19. Posts 11386

abercrombie jeans are the nut low

cant believe i bought them once for like $100 and wore them one time and decided that i hate them

WHAT IS THIS 

EvilSky    Czech Republic. Aug 24 2010 18:23. Posts 8918

wat indeed


CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 24 2010 18:28. Posts 11386

if ur gonna buy clothes from the mall the only decent store is the buckle in my experience

i really like their jeans

WHAT IS THIS 

acdawg712   United States. Aug 24 2010 18:58. Posts 2639

During college I liked American Eagle. They were moderarely priced from 15-50. These days I like Banana Republic mainly because I can afford it. To me, it is decently expensive to pay $80 for jeans, $30 for a t-shirt, and $60 for a polo but that is just me, but I should take a look at Express as prices are similar. Sometimes, Hugo Boss has sales and I was able to pick up a casual dress shirt, a jacket/tshirt combo, and jeans for 250 as they were 50% off and idc about the newest fashions in super expensive clothing. It is funny since the sign said 30% but if you asked it became 50%.

phil hellmuth is genuinely a stupid person and he does not understand poker very well at all - [vital]myth 

[vital]Myth    United States. Aug 24 2010 19:05. Posts 12159

express is really solid for casual clothes, decent quality, good prices, constant sales/specials

banana republic is good too

Eh, I can go a few more orbits in life, before taxes blind me out - PoorUser 

jeffv8x_-_16   Belgium. Aug 24 2010 19:41. Posts 2835

Dont wear clothes obv.

how can u shove the river, he cant possibly call with worse -TalentedTom 

Uptown   . Aug 24 2010 19:42. Posts 3557

My tastes are along the same lines as acdawg as I use BR and Boss. (and I frequented Lanvin en Bleu for a while but they don't exist in the States)

But having blows far too much dough on cloths this past year, I'm probably going on an account freeze in that regard.


edit: also, try visiting styleforum.

Half Pot!Last edit: 24/08/2010 19:43

RiKD    United States. Aug 24 2010 19:55. Posts 9917

if you are fat try to look like a gangster. there are 2 ways to go depending on how you roll. you could go fat italian style like mobsters or fat black style like rick ross and offensive linemen. if you are skinny there are some options. you can generally go heroin addict rocker style, cool euro style (which ends up looking like douchebag hipster if you aren't careful), or cool stoner/surfer style. if you are jacked just wear shirts and jeans that fit you well. which basically means tight enough so the girls get wet looking at your body but not too tight to the point it's obvious what you are up to. also, avoid getting too douchey unless you can pull it off. mike the situation can wear whatever he wants, BangYu coming off of abercrombie and fitch probably cannot.

from your name and the fact that you are posting on a gambling site linked w/ starcraft there's prob a dece chance you are asian. if you are asian it should be easy. anytime i see a cool looking asian i think to myself like "man, that nukka must be from tokyo or seoul on that new shit." so just dress like you are from tokyo or seoul on that new shit.

if you don't really fit into any of these categories and you can afford best is to probably just go to the mall and find a stylish gay guy or stylish hot girl working in the store and just ask them what fits and looks good. keep in mind they are trying to break you for your last dollar but most of them also just really like fashion and clothes and go home and jack off to project runway and unless they are sociopaths are genuinely going to want to help you and do their job well.


Ket    United Kingdom. Aug 24 2010 20:27. Posts 8665

rikd is a truly great poster


SakiSaki    Sweden. Aug 24 2010 20:32. Posts 9687

If theres one thing ive noticed from my trips to the us its that the jeans fucking suck so much. Im not a fasion expert but most of the jeans that guys in the us wear are so fucking ugly seriously get ur shit together. Its like usa have conquered and exceeded at anything that has to do with popular culture but when it comes to jeans its just fucking fail all over.

what wackass site is this nigga?  

nolan   Ireland. Aug 24 2010 20:33. Posts 6205

that was like one of the best posts in lp history.

On September 08 2008 10:07 Baal wrote: my head is a gyroscope, your argument is invalid 

Ket    United Kingdom. Aug 24 2010 20:44. Posts 8665

Just curious about results,

Poll: How many pairs of jeans do you own that you actively wear?
(Vote): 1
(Vote): 2
(Vote): 3
(Vote): 4-5
(Vote): 6-7
(Vote): 8+


Jamie217   Canada. Aug 24 2010 20:56. Posts 4351

I do my own laundry so gotta have 4/5 jeans in the cycle
and yes that was an awesome post by rikd looool


jeffv8x_-_16   Belgium. Aug 24 2010 21:02. Posts 2835


  On August 24 2010 19:44 Ket wrote:
Just curious about results,

Poll: How many pairs of jeans do you own that you actively wear?
(Vote): 1
(Vote): 2
(Vote): 3
(Vote): 4-5
(Vote): 6-7
(Vote): 8+



Where is the 0 option?

how can u shove the river, he cant possibly call with worse -TalentedTom 

F4Zi   United Kingdom. Aug 24 2010 21:27. Posts 3462

i like to wear plain clothes with no branded text. also im not a fan of graphic t-shirts.

hackett - polos ($100)
dolce and gabbana - shirts ($250-500), best jeans ($300), leather jackets ($2000-4000)
gucci - best loafers i have bought
dior homme - best for sneakers ($400), hi-tops ($600), and if you can afford the clothes here they are very sleek, mainly black and white, ALSO SHOULDER BAGS AND WEEKEND BAGS, all black leather ($1000-3000)
pal zileri - italian, smart look, not too expensive
ermenegildo zegna - italian very smart clothes but more expensive and better quality than pal zileri. i have a scarf from here that is like 350 dollars
tom ford, dior, rayban - sunglasses
burberry prosum - sickest range ever, would love to buy everything in this range
diesel black gold - casual wear
junk de luxe - affordable, casual, danish brand, colourful, shirts ($100)
y3 - for the best casual trainers ($350), tracksuit bottoms ($200), sportswear - this is part of addidas range and is by a Japanese designer named Yohji Yamamoto
VILEBREQUIN - swimming shorts and beach towels ($200) each
all saints - t-shirts

i have probably spent the most out of anyone on this forum on clothes. buy a few good quality items that will last rather than lots of clothes.

i just read your not too expensive part just now, cant help you there, nike maybe?

My girlfriend started blowing me and then she stopped, I went on tilt and donkey punched her.Last edit: 24/08/2010 21:47

the cleaner   Germany. Aug 24 2010 21:40. Posts 3014

I agree with [vital]Myth. Don´t know about express, but Banana Republic is awesome.

there are no facts only interpretations 

SirBlotto   Germany. Aug 24 2010 21:53. Posts 1270


  On August 24 2010 20:27 F4Zi wrote:

i have probably spent the most out of anyone on this forum on clothes and haircuts





whamm!   Albania. Aug 24 2010 23:28. Posts 11625

wow so much gay in this thread for a supposedly "butch"site lolz


KeanuReaver   United States. Aug 25 2010 00:13. Posts 2022


  On August 24 2010 22:28 whamm! wrote:
wow so much gay in this thread for a supposedly "butch"site lolz



really? that post by rikd is the manliest fashion advice anyone has ever given anywhere

and the endurance required for MMA, which has actions like punching and kicking bone and muscle with 1000-2500 PSI. - Taco 

K40Cheddar   United States. Aug 25 2010 00:28. Posts 2202

sports authority athletic shirts work for me

GG 

Maynard!   United States. Aug 25 2010 02:18. Posts 4453

Embrace your true busto and go to walmart

Now I really am a busto. Thanks FTP. 

vegable   United States. Aug 25 2010 02:38. Posts 2453

You're going to want to think about the style you're attempting to project. Are you a laid back person or someone who isn't afraid to show a little cuff? How deep can your v-neck really go? Thinking about jumping from one brand to another doesn't really answer any of these questions, it just shows your awareness of maturity in relation to your wardrobe. Thats all it shows. and the amount of consideration given to your outfit will be obvious to anyone fashion conscious. Think about you first. then think carefully about how each individual piece can work with the others.

fast tips:
1) make sure everything is form fitting. form fitting will mean medium sized shirts to a medium sized average joe, but really we mean medium with a slim fit.
2) start with the classics. solid colors, simple patterns, small patterns, small logos if you have to. loud design is obnoxious
3) look for inspiration on the satorialist fashion blog. loads of ideas there guaranteed to keep you busy for hours.

Stir fry Normandy 

vegable   United States. Aug 25 2010 02:39. Posts 2453

obviously these outfits are gonna be UNSUITABLE for everyday wear but the point is to pay special attention to how fit, pattern, and color plays a role in each individual piece in creating an entire outfit.













Stir fry NormandyLast edit: 25/08/2010 02:48

vegable   United States. Aug 25 2010 02:40. Posts 2453








Stir fry NormandyLast edit: 25/08/2010 02:47

LikeASet   United States. Aug 25 2010 02:53. Posts 2113

Lawl, I regularly buy clothes from Express for Men. About once every few months I'll make like a 100-200$ purchase. If you're going to get clothes from express, become an express member because if you don't, everything just becomes way over priced.
Some other good stores IMO are;
-Guess
-Calvin Klein
-Heritage
-Aldo (for shoes)
Please don't get a man purse btw, unless it's used for carrying bricks of $$$ to the poker tables.


NotSorry   United States. Aug 25 2010 02:57. Posts 2603

Honestly theses days I just wear a random shirt that our team sponsors give out because they are free, then some khaki shorts and flip flops. Don't even have to worry about getting dress can grab any random shirt+shorts/pants in my closest and look like a BOSS.

We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. 

Baalim   Mexico. Aug 25 2010 02:59. Posts 34312

lol pics, id put a large wage that 90% of them are raging homos... the other 10% is a weird priest in black

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

vegable   United States. Aug 25 2010 03:08. Posts 2453

Thats Karl Otto Lagerfeldt, German fashionist, head designer and creative director for Chanel. also the current owner of Fendi.

Stir fry NormandyLast edit: 25/08/2010 03:13

iop   Sweden. Aug 25 2010 03:16. Posts 4953


  On August 24 2010 19:56 Jamie217 wrote:
I do my own laundry so gotta have 4/5 jeans in the cycle
and yes that was an awesome post by rikd looool



Don't wash your jeans, or avoid it as much as possible

"The naked truth about denim is reflected from the passion of the everday life, where your life gives denim itäs unique character, formed by you into a second skin."


  On August 24 2010 19:32 SakiSaki wrote:
If theres one thing ive noticed from my trips to the us its that the jeans fucking suck so much. Im not a fasion expert but most of the jeans that guys in the us wear are so fucking ugly seriously get ur shit together. Its like usa have conquered and exceeded at anything that has to do with popular culture but when it comes to jeans its just fucking fail all over.



This QFT


  On August 24 2010 17:19 CrownRoyal wrote:
abercrombie jeans are the nut low

cant believe i bought them once for like $100 and wore them one time and decided that i hate them




First of all, $100 is not alot for a pair of jeans. Second of all, the only the AF makes is comfartable sweaters (hooded)


I tend to wear jeans that fit my body, atm replay waitom, and jennon are good for me. I have in the past always bought Nudie, Replay, Ijin.

Some brands (for jeans) I would recommend are: Jacob Cohen, Nudie, Replay, True Religion, Acne (if you are thin).
Chinos (Khackis) You dont really need any upmarket brands here.
I'm fairly boring regarding my shirts, they are usually (100%) button-down Ralph Lauren shirts, in a pastel color; like turqoise, pink etc.
Sweaters, I try to avoid V-neck sweaters, but I usually wear some colorful sweater (also im boring here; ralph lauren, gant etc).
Shoes: My achiilles heal, I buy a shit load of shoes, usually sneakers are Hugo Boss, but can mix it up with Converse, Prada, Dior etc





Blazers are fine to buy in the US, I like to mix and match with colors and patterns.

Milkman lol i didnt spend half a thousand on a phone so i could play it cool and be all stealth 

iop   Sweden. Aug 25 2010 03:16. Posts 4953


  On August 24 2010 19:56 Jamie217 wrote:
I do my own laundry so gotta have 4/5 jeans in the cycle
and yes that was an awesome post by rikd looool



Don't wash your jeans, or avoid it as much as possible

"The naked truth about denim is reflected from the passion of the everday life, where your life gives denim itäs unique character, formed by you into a second skin."


  On August 24 2010 19:32 SakiSaki wrote:
If theres one thing ive noticed from my trips to the us its that the jeans fucking suck so much. Im not a fasion expert but most of the jeans that guys in the us wear are so fucking ugly seriously get ur shit together. Its like usa have conquered and exceeded at anything that has to do with popular culture but when it comes to jeans its just fucking fail all over.



This QFT


  On August 24 2010 17:19 CrownRoyal wrote:
abercrombie jeans are the nut low

cant believe i bought them once for like $100 and wore them one time and decided that i hate them




First of all, $100 is not alot for a pair of jeans. Second of all, the only the AF makes is comfartable sweaters (hooded)


I tend to wear jeans that fit my body, atm replay waitom, and jennon are good for me. I have in the past always bought Nudie, Replay, Ijin.

Some brands (for jeans) I would recommend are: Jacob Cohen, Nudie, Replay, True Religion, Acne (if you are thin).
Chinos (Khackis) You dont really need any upmarket brands here.
I'm fairly boring regarding my shirts, they are usually (100%) button-down Ralph Lauren shirts, in a pastel color; like turqoise, pink etc.
Sweaters, I try to avoid V-neck sweaters, but I usually wear some colorful sweater (also im boring here; ralph lauren, gant etc).
Shoes: My achiilles heal, I buy a shit load of shoes, usually sneakers are Hugo Boss, but can mix it up with Converse, Prada, Dior etc
Blazers are fine to buy in the US, I like to mix and match with colors and patterns.

Milkman lol i didnt spend half a thousand on a phone so i could play it cool and be all stealth 

mrpav.com   Canada. Aug 25 2010 03:23. Posts 3069

I wash my jeans once a month at best. Its called wearing underwear. My jeans don't smell or get dirty, and until they do i don't wash them.

===== mrpav.com ===== 

cariadon   Estonia. Aug 25 2010 03:44. Posts 4019

if you want to get rich playing poker you should start out with rags so later on you can say "from rags to riches"
if you're rich already you can go from rich to rikd


mnj   United States. Aug 25 2010 04:43. Posts 3848


  On August 25 2010 02:44 cariadon wrote:
if you want to get rich playing poker you should start out with rags so later on you can say "from rags to riches"
if you're rich already you can go from rich to rikd



finally first quality post in this thread


qwerty67890   New Zealand. Aug 25 2010 04:44. Posts 14026

I just buy own brand jeans, coz i spill beer all over them, use them as a napkin and generally ruin them when drunk.


ggplz   Sweden. Aug 25 2010 04:48. Posts 16784


  On August 25 2010 02:44 cariadon wrote:
if you want to get rich playing poker you should start out with rags so later on you can say "from rags to riches"
if you're rich already you can go from rich to rikd

if poker is dangerous to them i would rank sports betting as a Kodiak grizzly bear who smells blood after you just threw a javelin into his cub - RaiNKhAN 

Stroggos   New Zealand. Aug 25 2010 06:51. Posts 1117


  On August 24 2010 15:30 BangYu wrote:
After wearing abercrombie since highschool, im trying to switch my style. Something to like express? I like a lot of their clothes but was wondering where do you guys shop. How much you drop on clothes.
And if any of you have any nice stores/sites that arent too expensive u like to shop at.





i don't drop that much on clothes, and you realize that pretty much the only thing clothes can 'express' is how much of a douche you are.


Jun   Croatia. Aug 25 2010 07:17. Posts 825



Just wear that

/thread

Life is a coinflip 

iop   Sweden. Aug 25 2010 07:25. Posts 4953


  On August 25 2010 05:51 Stroggos wrote:
Show nested quote +



i don't drop that much on clothes, and you realize that pretty much the only thing clothes can 'express' is how much of a douche you are.


pic plz

Milkman lol i didnt spend half a thousand on a phone so i could play it cool and be all stealthLast edit: 25/08/2010 09:32

Steal City   United States. Aug 25 2010 08:14. Posts 2537


  On August 25 2010 06:25 iop wrote:
i don't drop that much on clothes, and you realize that pretty much the only thing clothes can 'express' is how much of a douche you are.

pic plz



so u think f4zi is a douche?

Intersango.com intersango.com  

BangYu   United States. Aug 25 2010 08:29. Posts 251

Im not azn, im white pretty built, about 5'9''. cant wear abercrombie cause their fkn logo is on everything which i cant stand. I used to shop there cause their shit fit me nice. Jeans, shirts, everything. I just got 2 pairs of jeans at express and their material is wayyy different. Much more comfortable and stretchy i guess. Where as abecrombie jeans are rly fkin stiff, hard to sit down in em and shit. The only thing that sux is that im kinda fkin short which sux but w/e. Cant complain. Thnx for the replies ill check some of those stores out


F4Zi   United Kingdom. Aug 25 2010 08:59. Posts 3462


  On August 25 2010 07:14 Steal City wrote:
Show nested quote +



so u think f4zi is a douche?


hahhaha i love it.

My girlfriend started blowing me and then she stopped, I went on tilt and donkey punched her. 

anarki   Belgium. Aug 25 2010 09:08. Posts 288

I'm convinced LP is full of queers

The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental. - John Steinbeck 

iop   Sweden. Aug 25 2010 09:30. Posts 4953


  On August 25 2010 07:14 Steal City wrote:
Show nested quote +



so u think f4zi is a douche?



Sorry, that was a quote from another lp:er and my comment was "pic plz" - I spend alot of money on clothes


  On August 25 2010 05:51 Stroggos wrote:
Show nested quote +



i don't drop that much on clothes, and you realize that pretty much the only thing clothes can 'express' is how much of a douche you are.





But to answer your question, no I don't think f4zi is a douche

Milkman lol i didnt spend half a thousand on a phone so i could play it cool and be all stealth 

Baalim   Mexico. Aug 25 2010 09:31. Posts 34312


  On August 25 2010 07:14 Steal City wrote:
Show nested quote +



so u think f4zi is a douche?


i do


btw that is very strange coming from iop who looked very fashion/douche himself in his early pics, you look much more "relaxed" in the newer ones was it a conscious change?

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

iop   Sweden. Aug 25 2010 09:55. Posts 4953

I quoted Stroggos, I call someone douchy by judging his attitude not his clothes.

Milkman lol i didnt spend half a thousand on a phone so i could play it cool and be all stealth 

Maynard!   United States. Aug 25 2010 10:49. Posts 4453

I approve of any thread that allows F4zi to write a manifesto on buying purses.

Now I really am a busto. Thanks FTP. 

iop   Sweden. Aug 25 2010 12:34. Posts 4953


  On August 25 2010 08:08 anarki wrote:
I'm convinced LP is full of queers



And I'm convinced that lp is full of hippies with no sense what's going on in the real world. I kid you not.

Milkman lol i didnt spend half a thousand on a phone so i could play it cool and be all stealth 

gororokgororok   Netherlands. Aug 25 2010 13:07. Posts 3941

i tell you this, clothes matter shit.

jeans and a random t shirt and you're good to go. its all about your non verbal language if you wanna have attention from ze ladiessssss.
save the dollars, work on your attitude.


gororokgororok   Netherlands. Aug 25 2010 13:08. Posts 3941

except if u wanna wear a suit, then spend like 1k euro. other then that, don't.


cariadon   Estonia. Aug 25 2010 13:53. Posts 4019

is gorororororokgorokorkrkorok Joeingram or something ? im confused
no hard feelings, you (both?) play a lot


EvilSky    Czech Republic. Aug 25 2010 15:40. Posts 8918


  On August 25 2010 11:34 iop wrote:
Show nested quote +



And I'm convinced that lp is full of hippies with no sense what's going on in the real world. I kid you not.

So your definition of real world sense is knowing how to match your purse to your hat ?


thewh00sel    United States. Aug 25 2010 15:55. Posts 2735

GmotherfuckingQ

A government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights: it holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force against legally disarmed victims. - Ayn Rand 

Perisie   . Aug 25 2010 15:58. Posts 801

£25 green and black sneakers (my superb taste in shoes has not changed over the years)
£5 smart black shirt of unknown origin
£9 tight dark jeans


Jhyun88   United States. Aug 25 2010 16:33. Posts 1383

I'm a tallish (6ft or 182cm) skinny (155-160lb range) Korean. Theres a lot of pressure on me to be fashionable and have cool haircuts. sigh...
Well... I find that a lot of times you really can't go wrong with decent blank white shirt with nice pair of jeans THAT ACTUALLY FIT YOU. Sometimes simple > * especially if you're tall and skinny-fit range. Never understood why every other white kids wear shitty rags from quicksilver and terrible looking jeans...




BangYu   United States. Aug 25 2010 16:33. Posts 251

all you haters need to experience goin out and actually doin things. Hit up some nice clubs.


Perisie   . Aug 25 2010 18:09. Posts 801

i dont really know how to get proper fitting jeans.....

ive always had baggy big jeans that just run off me, but very occaisionally i see men with amazing-fitting jeans that just currrrl around their ass . i wish i could be like them :3

i dont know if its because theyre physically shaped in a certain way (big asses on small body?)

im 6'2, 80kg and i like my ass but dont know if i need custom made or expensive jeans to fit it?

the other day i went to a local superstore and got 2 pairs for 9-14 quid. at first i got the longest leg, but remembered that you want a well-fitting length so i swapped them for smaller length (and possibly could have gone ever short than that, much to my bafflement....).

so now i have reasonably lengthed tight jeans (one pair sinks a bit but thats why i have a belt right). idk really what my ass looks like in them ill have to try the big mirror downstairs.


what im WONDERING is.......what the fuck is the difference between the £5 superstore jeans and the £14 superstore jeans and the £40 jeans in the other stores and the £100+ jeans some people seem to enjoy (tho i dont know what highstreet shop arund here would sell those)?

and what is the difference between the dozens of jean brands? do they all fit slightly differently, like some size 12 shoes are slightly larger than some other brand of size 12 shoe?

do different priced and different brand jeans fit your ass better or something? because thats all i want to know. why does it take me so long to ask a question sometimes


thewh00sel    United States. Aug 25 2010 18:15. Posts 2735


  On August 25 2010 17:09 Perisie wrote:
why does it take me so long to ask a question sometimes


It appears by the gayness of your post that you are either gay or actually a woman, which would also explain why it takes you so long to ask a question. I suspect you also cannot drive or answer questions efficiently either.

A government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights: it holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force against legally disarmed victims. - Ayn Rand 

iop   Sweden. Aug 25 2010 18:21. Posts 4953


  On August 25 2010 14:40 EvilSky wrote:
Show nested quote +


So your definition of real world sense is knowing how to match your purse to your hat ?



The "purse" that i wear is my computer-bag for work. I wear a hat when its cold, and a cap when im not at work, and im feeling lazy

Milkman lol i didnt spend half a thousand on a phone so i could play it cool and be all stealth 

Samsung   Poland. Aug 25 2010 18:27. Posts 238


Ernir Steinn   Iceland. Aug 25 2010 19:04. Posts 13

casual pokerplayer wears a hockey shirt!!!!!!!!!!!!!! or superman clothes

sprækur sem lækur og alltaf tiltækur:D í póker! 

ggplz   Sweden. Aug 25 2010 19:11. Posts 16784

£9 jeans wtf

if poker is dangerous to them i would rank sports betting as a Kodiak grizzly bear who smells blood after you just threw a javelin into his cub - RaiNKhAN 

acdawg712   United States. Aug 25 2010 19:32. Posts 2639


  On August 25 2010 17:27 Sadi wrote:



lmao. Is that TO on the left?

phil hellmuth is genuinely a stupid person and he does not understand poker very well at all - [vital]myth 

Dogan0s   United States. Aug 25 2010 20:02. Posts 902

lol wtf
SO many canadians on LP an none mentioned dsquared2
like the sickest outfits atm , and the best shoes ever there
http://www.dsquared2.com

 Last edit: 25/08/2010 20:02

player999   Brasil. Aug 25 2010 20:14. Posts 7978


  On August 25 2010 18:11 concrescence wrote:
£9 jeans wtf



grats on the WSOP win

Browsing through your hand histories makes me wonder that you might not be aware these games are possibly play money. Have you ever tried to cash out? - Kapol 

Etherone   Canada. Aug 25 2010 20:19. Posts 753


  On August 25 2010 19:14 player999 wrote:
Show nested quote +



grats on the WSOP win

seriously what event, i totally missed this

congrats.

blah blah homosexuality jeans blah blah spending money on clothes.


aseq   Netherlands. Aug 25 2010 20:24. Posts 894

Any jeans that fit you well are ok. I don't value brand jeans really but I stay away from the very cheap stuff, 100 for a pair is fine.
I'll wear a shirt or t-shirt over that.
But how you wear your clothes matters a lot more than what you wear. As long as the clothes aren't way off, there's np.


NiagaraPoker   Canada. Aug 25 2010 23:08. Posts 425


  On August 25 2010 19:02 Dogan0s wrote:
lol wtf
SO many canadians on LP an none mentioned dsquared2
like the sickest outfits atm , and the best shoes ever there
http://www.dsquared2.com



I don't even know what you mean by this? Canada is not even on the shipping list.

give them nothing, but take from them.. everything. 

SirBlotto   Germany. Aug 25 2010 23:14. Posts 1270


  On August 25 2010 19:19 Etherone wrote:
Show nested quote +


seriously what event, i totally missed this

congrats.

blah blah homosexuality jeans blah blah spending money on clothes.



yeah what event ?


cariadon   Estonia. Aug 25 2010 23:15. Posts 4019


  On August 25 2010 18:32 acdawg712 wrote:
Show nested quote +



lmao. Is that TO on the left?


lmao + Show Spoiler +

+ Show Spoiler +

?

fuck.


Baalim   Mexico. Aug 26 2010 02:48. Posts 34312


  On August 25 2010 15:33 BangYu wrote:
all you haters need to experience goin out and actually doin things. Hit up some nice clubs.



i guarantee you i go out twice as much as you, we just go to different places/bars, and meet with different people with different intellects and values.

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro OnlineLast edit: 26/08/2010 02:50

Baalim   Mexico. Aug 26 2010 02:49. Posts 34312


  On August 25 2010 14:40 EvilSky wrote:
Show nested quote +


So your definition of real world sense is knowing how to match your purse to your hat ?



bam

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

iop   Sweden. Aug 26 2010 03:10. Posts 4953


  On August 26 2010 01:48 Baal wrote:
Show nested quote +



i guarantee you i go out twice as much as you, we just go to different places/bars, and meet with different people with different intellects and values.


Sometime in the future, if you get guys get a job and start meeting future customers, you will realise you can't wear a t-shirt and flipflops.

Even when you go to a job interview, clothing is one aspect that the interviewer will first judge you by.

Milkman lol i didnt spend half a thousand on a phone so i could play it cool and be all stealthLast edit: 26/08/2010 03:16

Baalim   Mexico. Aug 26 2010 03:32. Posts 34312


  On August 26 2010 02:10 iop wrote:
Show nested quote +



Sometime in the future, if you get guys get a job and start meeting future customers, you will realise you can't wear a t-shirt and flipflops.

Even when you go to a job interview, clothing is one aspect that the interviewer will first judge you by.



So clothing is retarded, but you do it to humor stupid people who will judge you based on that?, if you are aware of the game why dont you grow some balls and stop playing ball?

Thankfully i dont have the need to dress, talk or act in an arbitrary way to please other people.

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

iop   Sweden. Aug 26 2010 04:00. Posts 4953

no because you are turning 27 and still living with your parents

Milkman lol i didnt spend half a thousand on a phone so i could play it cool and be all stealth 

iop   Sweden. Aug 26 2010 04:01. Posts 4953


  On August 26 2010 02:32 Baal wrote:
Show nested quote +



So clothing is retarded, but you do it to humor stupid people who will judge you based on that?, if you are aware of the game why dont you grow some balls and stop playing ball?

Thankfully i dont have the need to dress, talk or act in an arbitrary way to please other people.



I don't judge, but interviewers will judge you.

why dont you grow some balls and move out of your parents house

Milkman lol i didnt spend half a thousand on a phone so i could play it cool and be all stealth 

ggplz   Sweden. Aug 26 2010 04:10. Posts 16784

iop is obv right

if poker is dangerous to them i would rank sports betting as a Kodiak grizzly bear who smells blood after you just threw a javelin into his cub - RaiNKhAN 

Baalim   Mexico. Aug 26 2010 04:37. Posts 34312


  On August 26 2010 03:01 iop wrote:
Show nested quote +



I don't judge, but interviewers will judge you.

why dont you grow some balls and move out of your parents house



so you only dress up for interviews or work?, i somehow doubt it? btw when i attack your wrong ideas you go and attack me which proves you have no way to defend them.

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

iop   Sweden. Aug 26 2010 04:50. Posts 4953

yes keep telling yourself that.

no i dress up for parties too. Or if I feel like it, but mind you I vary my clothing alot.

Baal you seem to know everything, you seem to hate everything materialistic out there, and you are always right.

I dont have to argue with you because you and I live two entirely different lifestyles.

Do you really need me to discuss that fact why it's right or wrong to put a suit on to a job interview? Or maybe having a shower and shaving if you meet an important customer?


Milkman lol i didnt spend half a thousand on a phone so i could play it cool and be all stealth 

Loco   Canada. Aug 26 2010 05:24. Posts 21022

seems to me that he doesn't buy it that you are wearing certain clothes for the unique purpose of functionality in your life, because that would sound as if you were suddenly placed in a moment and time and you had to act a part as a life. seems much more likely that your job, friends and activities revolve around where you are placing your values and it is those very values that are being targeted here because they are deemed to be contemptible. it would be hard to believe for anyone that a person who spends so much money on material possessions and decorating oneself doesn't have his self-worth revolve around it, and also very unlikely that he's not really conforming internally while conforming externally.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount 

RaiZ   France. Aug 26 2010 05:43. Posts 1503

What's wrong with abercrombie djeans ? They looks good imo especially the looser's ones
If not maybe something like this ?
or
or

Dunno really they all looks good in europe and chicks love them.

Shin-il : Yeah it was very very very good for me too. Rekrul : YOU MOTHER FUCKING FUCKING SON OF A BITCH 

whamm!   Albania. Aug 26 2010 06:12. Posts 11625

i just go for track pants lately


Baalim   Mexico. Aug 26 2010 07:33. Posts 34312

exactly what loco said, i simply dont buy that you dress up because you have to.

i do dress up when i have to, i am not going to fight the stupid traditions and segregation tools of society in lets say, a funeral, or a wedding, or even as you said, a job interview, but dont kid yourself that is not your case, you like dressing up and you should question yourself why do i like fashion and clothing?.

It is not because of pure aesthetic because fashion changes every year, what is considered hideous today will be fashion in 2 years so then really think why do you like dressing up, and its because its a tool to fit in yet be above who dresses poorly in society, even if you dont feel superior to them you want to be treated better better.


If you think about it and realize how stupid it is you will stop doing it and you will be free from it, and attacking me changes nothing about you, i am not perfect i am shallow in some spots but how does that proves anything?

PS: the "grow some balls" comment was very aggressive and i apologize.

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro OnlineLast edit: 26/08/2010 07:34

Loco   Canada. Aug 26 2010 08:08. Posts 21022

attempting to teach a philistine to not be a philistine is like attempting to teach a cat to behave like a dog

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount 

Dogan0s   United States. Aug 26 2010 08:23. Posts 902


  On August 25 2010 22:08 NiagaraPoker wrote:
Show nested quote +



I don't even know what you mean by this? Canada is not even on the shipping list.


the designers are from canada and i thought they might be well known there since madona is wearing their clothes lol. :>


Baalim   Mexico. Aug 26 2010 08:59. Posts 34312


  On August 26 2010 07:08 Loco wrote:
attempting to teach a philistine to not be a philistine is like attempting to teach a cat to behave like a dog



Iop is no F4azi, i think he might figure it out

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

XoXthajmanXoX   United States. Aug 26 2010 09:11. Posts 834

First of all. . .Who's the Diva with 8+ Jeans?? Doesn't anyone shop at Goodwill anymore? Fuck you dudes and your money trying to buy fashion. Fashion can't be bought, it's all about attitude.

SERIOUSLY! 

kemo   Denmark. Aug 26 2010 09:26. Posts 573


  On August 26 2010 08:11 XoXthajmanXoX wrote:
First of all. . .Who's the Diva with 8+ Jeans?? Doesn't anyone shop at Goodwill anymore? Fuck you dudes and your money trying to buy fashion. Fashion can't be bought, it's all about attitude.



yeah I think that have been covered already.
I can easily spend 200$ on a pair of jeans or a shirt and mixing it up with my second hand shorts I bought for 1$.
Almost no one in here is saying that $ equals = good fashion, they are pretty much all advocating finding something that fits you, your style, your body and that you feel comfortable in.


Jamie217   Canada. Aug 26 2010 09:28. Posts 4351


  On August 26 2010 07:23 Dogan0s wrote:
Show nested quote +



the designers are from canada and i thought they might be well known there since madona is wearing their clothes lol. :>




ive never heard of them


Loco   Canada. Aug 26 2010 09:34. Posts 21022


  On August 26 2010 07:59 Baal wrote:
Show nested quote +



Iop is no F4azi, i think he might figure it out


you need to get rid of your dumb optimism =[

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount 

TheHuHu3   United States. Aug 26 2010 09:58. Posts 5544

Lots of hipster faggotry in this thread.

TheHuHu4 coming soon :) 

TheHuHu3   United States. Aug 26 2010 09:59. Posts 5544


  On August 26 2010 03:10 concrescence wrote:
iop is obv right



Wtf? When did you win a bracelet?

TheHuHu4 coming soon :) 

whamm!   Albania. Aug 27 2010 21:25. Posts 11625


  On August 26 2010 08:11 XoXthajmanXoX wrote:
First of all. . .Who's the Diva with 8+ Jeans?? Doesn't anyone shop at Goodwill anymore? Fuck you dudes and your money trying to buy fashion. Fashion can't be bought, it's all about attitude.



[x]gayest post in thread


Baalim   Mexico. Aug 27 2010 22:43. Posts 34312


  On August 26 2010 08:34 Loco wrote:
Show nested quote +



you need to get rid of your dumb optimism =[



i dont think i have ever been called an optimist before :3

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 28 2010 00:07. Posts 1929

I'm not really following this argument closely but I'd like to say, who cares why anyone is into anything? Maybe iop likes to dress up because that's how he was raised. Maybe it's a hobby he inherited from his dying grandmother so he likes it for sentimental reasons. Maybe he actually does follow fashion purely because he wants to be regarded as high class and that so he can separate himself from ugly people. His reasoning doesn't really matter. He could give a long explanation and still be off because he probably doesn't know himself. Why anyone does anything is usually pretty complicated. As long as his hobby isn't hurting anyone who cares why anyone is into anything.?

Trying to project a complex chain of reason or psychoanalyze other people's motives in something so harmless is often pointless and downright impolite.


albonycee   United States. Aug 28 2010 00:25. Posts 2749

baal and loco get a room dudes

(insert stupid shit)aments 

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 28 2010 00:26. Posts 1929

Ok I read the thread and I don't get what you guys are arguing about. So someone spends a lot of his disposable income on clothes. What difference is it if he spends it on cars or guitars or whores and cocaine? I don't think it's being materialistic. Whether or not they are philistines, maybe to famous fashion designers, but I'm sure people who spend a lot on clothes at least do a little research into what looks good on them and to them. Even if they don't who cares.


vegable   United States. Aug 28 2010 01:19. Posts 2453


  On August 27 2010 23:07 zulu_nation8 wrote:
I'm not really following this argument closely but I'd like to say, who cares why anyone is into anything? Maybe iop likes to dress up because that's how he was raised. Maybe it's a hobby he inherited from his dying grandmother so he likes it for sentimental reasons. Maybe he actually does follow fashion purely because he wants to be regarded as high class and that so he can separate himself from ugly people. His reasoning doesn't really matter. He could give a long explanation and still be off because he probably doesn't know himself. Why anyone does anything is usually pretty complicated. As long as his hobby isn't hurting anyone who cares why anyone is into anything.?

Trying to project a complex chain of reason or psychoanalyze other people's motives in something so harmless is often pointless and downright impolite.



didnt read 5 other pages of shit but quoted for trooth

people getting angsty over others for wearing certain clothing, for another entirely different reason, is ultimately retarded. They're merely insecure about the fact of life that is called "differing opinions". Even if two people are wearing the exact same outfit...go figure.

Dress how you like or join a nudist colony my friends

Stir fry Normandy 

Funktion   Australia. Aug 28 2010 05:31. Posts 1638


  On August 26 2010 06:33 Baal wrote:
exactly what loco said, i simply dont buy that you dress up because you have to.

i do dress up when i have to, i am not going to fight the stupid traditions and segregation tools of society in lets say, a funeral, or a wedding, or even as you said, a job interview, but dont kid yourself that is not your case, you like dressing up and you should question yourself why do i like fashion and clothing?.

It is not because of pure aesthetic because fashion changes every year, what is considered hideous today will be fashion in 2 years so then really think why do you like dressing up, and its because its a tool to fit in yet be above who dresses poorly in society, even if you dont feel superior to them you want to be treated better better.


If you think about it and realize how stupid it is you will stop doing it and you will be free from it, and attacking me changes nothing about you, i am not perfect i am shallow in some spots but how does that proves anything.



This coming from a clown who wears Versace sunglasses and has/had a "trendy" pierced lip lmao.


XoXthajmanXoX   United States. Aug 28 2010 10:44. Posts 834


  On August 27 2010 20:25 whamm! wrote:
Show nested quote +



[x]gayest post in thread


[x]gayest thread in lp

SERIOUSLY! 

Dogan0s   United States. Aug 28 2010 13:35. Posts 902


  On August 26 2010 08:28 Jamie217 wrote:
Show nested quote +




ive never heard of them



strange ;o
anyway i think their clothes are really expensive but they are the nuts.


Baalim   Mexico. Aug 28 2010 15:26. Posts 34312


  On August 28 2010 04:31 Funktion wrote:
Show nested quote +



This coming from a clown who wears Versace sunglasses and has/had a "trendy" pierced lip lmao.


This has come up in other threads before obviously and ive said more than once, those sunglasses were a gift from an aunt in christmas actually i lost them quite fast, oh and my lip piercing i still have it, and ive had it for about 8 years so you fail my friend.

Sorry but if you are trying to say i also follow fashion or care about brand then you will fail, and even if i didnt it wouldnt make anything ive said any less true.

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

Baalim   Mexico. Aug 28 2010 15:44. Posts 34312


  On August 27 2010 23:07 zulu_nation8 wrote:
I'm not really following this argument closely but I'd like to say, who cares why anyone is into anything? Maybe iop likes to dress up because that's how he was raised. Maybe it's a hobby he inherited from his dying grandmother so he likes it for sentimental reasons. Maybe he actually does follow fashion purely because he wants to be regarded as high class and that so he can separate himself from ugly people. His reasoning doesn't really matter. He could give a long explanation and still be off because he probably doesn't know himself. Why anyone does anything is usually pretty complicated. As long as his hobby isn't hurting anyone who cares why anyone is into anything.?

Trying to project a complex chain of reason or psychoanalyze other people's motives in something so harmless is often pointless and downright impolite.



All of those reasons are stupid.

Thats how he was raised? so you are saying indoctrination into irrational things is ok, you must love religion, if he does fashion to be regarded as a high class individual its even worse, and no the whys are not really complicated, on the contrary its quite simple.

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 28 2010 17:35. Posts 1929

I gave those examples to show people do stuff for a variety of reasons, the examples aren't meant to be taken literally. I also don't understand how following fashion is irrational? I just showed you some hypothetical reasons. Iop didn't explain very well why he spends a lot of money on clothes, his hobby certainly extends beyond mere function. But in response you and Loco basically called him a shallow, materialistic person for liking clothes. Maybe a bit too harsh? (I know he attacked you personally) Just because someone buys a $100+ pair of jeans doesn't mean his self-worth revolves around material possessions. People get disposable income, some like to buy shit with it. Who cares?


mrpav.com   Canada. Aug 28 2010 17:36. Posts 3069


  On August 25 2010 12:07 gororokgororok wrote:
i tell you this, clothes matter shit.

jeans and a random t shirt and you're good to go. its all about your non verbal language if you wanna have attention from ze ladiessssss.
save the dollars, work on your attitude.



Good thing i read everyone's points or i would be repeating what you just said. Many people aren't aware of this and try to compensate by buying expensive shit. Well said. If i could give you a thumbs up i would

===== mrpav.com ===== 

terrybunny19240   United States. Aug 28 2010 18:00. Posts 13829

The human brain isn't built to be rational, and there's no rule that says everything in life has to be rational. Every person has their own idiosyncrasies and most of the time these individual traits are going to be harmless. Trying to run around ironing out everyone's personalities isn't going to help anything. Why can't you just let people in here discuss the topic they are interested in and GTFO instead of AW'ing the fuck out of every thread by bringing up an argument and turning the threads topic into 'what does baal think of this subject'.


napalm   Poland. Aug 28 2010 18:20. Posts 171


  On August 28 2010 17:00 Night2o1 wrote:
The human brain isn't built to be rational, and there's no rule that says everything in life has to be rational. Every person has their own idiosyncrasies and most of the time these individual traits are going to be harmless. Trying to run around ironing out everyone's personalities isn't going to help anything. Why can't you just let people in here discuss the topic they are interested in and GTFO instead of AW'ing the fuck out of every thread by bringing up an argument and turning the threads topic into 'what does baal think of this subject'.



this


Loco   Canada. Aug 28 2010 18:30. Posts 21022


  On August 28 2010 16:35 zulu_nation8 wrote:
I gave those examples to show people do stuff for a variety of reasons, the examples aren't meant to be taken literally. I also don't understand how following fashion is irrational? I just showed you some hypothetical reasons. Iop didn't explain very well why he spends a lot of money on clothes, his hobby certainly extends beyond mere function. But in response you and Loco basically called him a shallow, materialistic person for liking clothes. Maybe a bit too harsh? (I know he attacked you personally) Just because someone buys a $100+ pair of jeans doesn't mean his self-worth revolves around material possessions. People get disposable income, some like to buy shit with it. Who cares?



What do you mean, too harsh? Is it too harsh when iop judges me as a hippie with no sense of what is going on in the real world? I don't think so, as I don't take it personally. He also shouldn't take it personally if we disagree with his ways. On the other hand, I was making an observational statement by stating him to be a philistine. It's not a comfortable word to hear about oneself, but it's not revolting either. I am not misjudging his habits and trying to psychoanalyze him, and do agree with Baal that it is simple. It is always a socio-cultural thing and the consumerism is always something someone does with belief that it will make them happier individuals, otherwise they would not do it.

So, yes, he is materialistic. Is there a problem with that? Like you said, as long as he doesn't do any harm to anyone then I don't see the problem. Although when he does make a condescending statement like "the hippies who don't understand" it does hint at something. Baal is trying to educate/enlighten someone he has no authority over, which is silly. iop might very well be saying much harsher things about us in our back than us simply stating he has a materialistic lifestyle, which is nothing but the obvious. And who's going to be harshly judged the most; the dissident or the one who follows the trail his culture has traced for him? Let's be real here, anything I (or Baal) says he can just discard and tell himself we simply have no idea what's going on in the world and feel better about himself in an instant.

It's not a big deal anyhow, who cares indeed.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 28/08/2010 18:33

Stygg   Sweden. Aug 28 2010 18:33. Posts 2347


  On August 28 2010 17:00 Night2o1 wrote:
The human brain isn't built to be rational, and there's no rule that says everything in life has to be rational. Every person has their own idiosyncrasies and most of the time these individual traits are going to be harmless. Trying to run around ironing out everyone's personalities isn't going to help anything. Why can't you just let people in here discuss the topic they are interested in and GTFO instead of AW'ing the fuck out of every thread by bringing up an argument and turning the threads topic into 'what does baal think of this subject'.



nice one


Loco   Canada. Aug 28 2010 18:41. Posts 21022


  On August 28 2010 17:00 Night2o1 wrote:
The human brain isn't built to be rational, and there's no rule that says everything in life has to be rational. Every person has their own idiosyncrasies and most of the time these individual traits are going to be harmless. Trying to run around ironing out everyone's personalities isn't going to help anything. Why can't you just let people in here discuss the topic they are interested in and GTFO instead of AW'ing the fuck out of every thread by bringing up an argument and turning the threads topic into 'what does baal think of this subject'.



I completely agree with you about rationalization, but I believe you are mistaking if you believe that having a consumerist lifestyle has anything to do with one's own idiosyncrasies. It is not unique to his own, it is a borrowed habit coming from socio-cultural values. For that reason it is something that is embraced or abandoned. Baal is in a heroic mission in his mind to help people realize things about themselves that they are oblivious to, and sadly that is not his job and only arouses antagony. I have been guilty of the same. He doesn't mean any wrong with it.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 28/08/2010 20:53

whamm!   Albania. Aug 28 2010 19:06. Posts 11625

i like the way the thread is going. reading this while having my early sunday morning cup of coffee


zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 28 2010 19:38. Posts 1929

Yes what he said was harsh as well. But if you're politely disagreeing with someone you wouldn't use "philistine" or "materialistic." If you're flaming then say whatever, but you said those were observations so I interpret it as you do think people who follow fashion are philistines and materialistic even when those words aren't meant as insults.

If someone actually puts time and effort into having good taste in something, he'll actually be the opposite of a philistine. On the other hand, those who follow fashion might call those who don't philistines for not putting into any thought into how they dress. The general public don't care how they dress, so those who do are actually the minority.

Not that it really matters if you're mindlessly following the masses or saying fuck you to popular culture. I personally prefer the former because the latter is hard to do. You said people want material things because it makes them happy, otherwise they wouldn't do it. People do things for a variety of reasons beyond just happiness. Eudaimonia is a horribly ancient and naive concept. Even if people buy clothes to fulfill their lives, I don't see anything wrong with it. Are you gonna tell them how to live life and what happiness should be to them?

You and Baal are far from "dissidents" of culture just because you dislike throwing down for clothes. Transsexuals who are into S&M are dissidents, because their way of life and experience of society are truly different from just about every other person. You guys just disagree with fashion, not a big deal, we're entitled to our opinions.


zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 28 2010 19:50. Posts 1929


  On August 28 2010 17:41 Loco wrote:
Show nested quote +



I completely agree with you about rationalization, but I believe you are mistaking if you believe that having a consumerist lifestyle has anything to do with one's own idiosyncrasies. It is not unique to his own, it is a borrowed habit coming from socio-cultural values. For that reason it is something that is embraced or abandoned. Baal is in a heroic mission in his mind to help people realize things about themselves that they are oblivious to, and sadly that is not his job and only arises antagony. I have been guilty of the same. He doesn't mean any wrong with it.


Nigga every value you have is a socio-cultural value. You can't NOT be cultured. If you were born in some sort of society you will be like everyone else. There's nothing to fight here. If you want to experience the limits of society, you can either commit some crimes or take LSD, those are Foucauldian limit-experiences society does not offer. If you are not doing any of those things then you are living just like everyone else. I don't see what people are oblivious to. No one can judge the value of values except for the individual.


Baalim   Mexico. Aug 28 2010 20:10. Posts 34312


  On August 28 2010 16:35 zulu_nation8 wrote:
I gave those examples to show people do stuff for a variety of reasons, the examples aren't meant to be taken literally. I also don't understand how following fashion is irrational? I just showed you some hypothetical reasons. Iop didn't explain very well why he spends a lot of money on clothes, his hobby certainly extends beyond mere function. But in response you and Loco basically called him a shallow, materialistic person for liking clothes. Maybe a bit too harsh? (I know he attacked you personally) Just because someone buys a $100+ pair of jeans doesn't mean his self-worth revolves around material possessions. People get disposable income, some like to buy shit with it. Who cares?



following fashion is irrational, it serves no purpose but to segregate people who dont (fit in a social circle) as i stated earlier fashion is clearly not about pure aesthetics since its whimsy and what is hideous today will be great in 1 year.

It is just like jewerly it serves not purpose but to show off wealth, class etc.

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

Baalim   Mexico. Aug 28 2010 20:15. Posts 34312


  On August 28 2010 18:50 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Show nested quote +



Nigga every value you have is a socio-cultural value. You can't NOT be cultured. If you were born in some sort of society you will be like everyone else. There's nothing to fight here. If you want to experience the limits of society, you can either commit some crimes or take LSD, those are Foucauldian limit-experiences society does not offer. If you are not doing any of those things then you are living just like everyone else. I don't see what people are oblivious to. No one can judge the value of values except for the individual.



this is absurd, while the "norm" is indeed to inherit irrational values from your culture that is stupid and the objective is to have none of them.

And i am not free of all of them but im free from many and ive freed myself from many indoctrinations like fashion, religion, government among many others.

Do you realize that so much of this worlds suffering comes from that?, wars, hatred, racism etc, they were values indoctrinated by their society and people with low level of awareness do not judge and take them as truths without questioning them.


Question fashion, tell me why it is reasonable to follow and devote a good chunk of your money on such a ridiculous thing.

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

Baalim   Mexico. Aug 28 2010 20:20. Posts 34312


  On August 28 2010 18:38 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Yes what he said was harsh as well. But if you're politely disagreeing with someone you wouldn't use "philistine" or "materialistic." If you're flaming then say whatever, but you said those were observations so I interpret it as you do think people who follow fashion are philistines and materialistic even when those words aren't meant as insults.

If someone actually puts time and effort into having good taste in something, he'll actually be the opposite of a philistine. On the other hand, those who follow fashion might call those who don't philistines for not putting into any thought into how they dress. The general public don't care how they dress, so those who do are actually the minority.

Not that it really matters if you're mindlessly following the masses or saying fuck you to popular culture. I personally prefer the former because the latter is hard to do. You said people want material things because it makes them happy, otherwise they wouldn't do it. People do things for a variety of reasons beyond just happiness. Eudaimonia is a horribly ancient and naive concept. Even if people buy clothes to fulfill their lives, I don't see anything wrong with it. Are you gonna tell them how to live life and what happiness should be to them?

You and Baal are far from "dissidents" of culture just because you dislike throwing down for clothes. Transsexuals who are into S&M are dissidents, because their way of life and experience of society are truly different from just about every other person. You guys just disagree with fashion, not a big deal, we're entitled to our opinions.



There is no such thing as "you are entitled to your opinion" either your opinion is based on reason, evidence and logic, or your opinion is wrong.

I can have an opinion that the earth is flat, my opinion is ignorant, irrational... so what does it mean that im entitled to it? does it mean its right? does it mean i cannot be rebutted by somebody? so tell me.

Your example of S&M makes no sense, because they like some sexual practice theya re somehow dissidents and we are not? how so, i dissent from most of the status quo from society but i guess if i dont wear a leather mask i am not a dissident.

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

Baalim   Mexico. Aug 28 2010 20:24. Posts 34312


  On August 28 2010 17:00 Night2o1 wrote:
The human brain isn't built to be rational, and there's no rule that says everything in life has to be rational. Every person has their own idiosyncrasies and most of the time these individual traits are going to be harmless. Trying to run around ironing out everyone's personalities isn't going to help anything. Why can't you just let people in here discuss the topic they are interested in and GTFO instead of AW'ing the fuck out of every thread by bringing up an argument and turning the threads topic into 'what does baal think of this subject'.



most sufferint in this world comes from being irrational, racism, segregation, war, hatred, envy, power etc, and no i dont advocate a mechanical society y myself indulge in things that could be considered irrational like racing cars but that is a very different kind of irrationality to fashion because canalize critically fashion and its purposes as i stated earlier it is the same purpose of jewerly, dont you wonder why we pay for stupid a stupid shiny crystal with no real value whatsoever thousands and thousands?

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 28 2010 20:27. Posts 1929


  On August 28 2010 19:10 Baal wrote:
Show nested quote +



following fashion is irrational, it serves no purpose but to segregate people who dont (fit in a social circle) as i stated earlier fashion is clearly not about pure aesthetics since its whimsy and what is hideous today will be great in 1 year.

It is just like jewerly it serves not purpose but to show off wealth, class etc.


maybe the purpose it serves them doesn't agree with your values. Irrational isn't the right word, their purpose merely follow a different kind of rationality. That's not to say humans do shit for the fuck of it all the time, maybe someone does like fashion just for the fuck of it. But usually people do have reasons for hobbies

People sometimes buy jewelery just to look good or maybe even as an investment, etc. Just because someone views life different than you doesn't make it less right.

 Last edit: 28/08/2010 20:33

uiCk   Canada. Aug 28 2010 20:36. Posts 3521

winners aka TJ Maxx

I wish one of your guys had children if I could kick them in the fucking head or stomp on their testicles so you can feel my pain because thats the pain I have waking up everyday -- Mike Tyson 

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 28 2010 20:48. Posts 1929


  On August 28 2010 19:15 Baal wrote:
Show nested quote +



this is absurd, while the "norm" is indeed to inherit irrational values from your culture that is stupid and the objective is to have none of them.

And i am not free of all of them but im free from many and ive freed myself from many indoctrinations like fashion, religion, government among many others.

Do you realize that so much of this worlds suffering comes from that?, wars, hatred, racism etc, they were values indoctrinated by their society and people with low level of awareness do not judge and take them as truths without questioning them.


Question fashion, tell me why it is reasonable to follow and devote a good chunk of your money on such a ridiculous thing.



I don't know why you're using logic to judge values, values always come before logic. For example I like clothes so I buy lots of it, that's my logic. You don't like clothes so you don't buy lots of it, that's your logic. It's not "irrational" to have different values, because there is no rational basis for any values.

Again, you're not free from any values, you just have DIFFERENT values. You can't really be free of values unless you stop living. If you hate the government you are an anarchist, if you hate religion you are an atheist, you are just taking different stances than other people on popular issues.

On the contrary, prejudice is intolerance which is what you are displaying. You don't like those who live life differently than you do and you feel justified, not just compelled, to change others.


zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 28 2010 20:53. Posts 1929


  On August 28 2010 19:24 Baal wrote:
Show nested quote +



most sufferint in this world comes from being irrational, racism, segregation, war, hatred, envy, power etc, and no i dont advocate a mechanical society y myself indulge in things that could be considered irrational like racing cars but that is a very different kind of irrationality to fashion because canalize critically fashion and its purposes as i stated earlier it is the same purpose of jewerly, dont you wonder why we pay for stupid a stupid shiny crystal with no real value whatsoever thousands and thousands?


You need to re-evaluate your understanding of rationality. What you're actually talking about is values, which are never judged by rationality. There's no one ultimate mode of reason we all follow. What seems reasonable to you might not to another person because people view things differently. There's nothing "irrational" about racing cars. What do you consider rational then? What you actually mean by rational is "my values" and irrational to be "those values that disagree with mine."


zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 28 2010 21:02. Posts 1929


  On August 28 2010 19:20 Baal wrote:
Show nested quote +



There is no such thing as "you are entitled to your opinion" either your opinion is based on reason, evidence and logic, or your opinion is wrong.

I can have an opinion that the earth is flat, my opinion is ignorant, irrational... so what does it mean that im entitled to it? does it mean its right? does it mean i cannot be rebutted by somebody? so tell me.

Your example of S&M makes no sense, because they like some sexual practice theya re somehow dissidents and we are not? how so, i dissent from most of the status quo from society but i guess if i dont wear a leather mask i am not a dissident.


The status quo has nothing to do with liking nor disliking fashion so you're really not disagreeing with anything.

The stuff about reason, evidence, and logic, I don't wanna write the same post four times in a row so I'll just say, shit's more complicated than what you make it out to be. But the gist is basically none of this stuff has anything to do with logic.


Loco   Canada. Aug 28 2010 21:20. Posts 21022


  On August 28 2010 18:38 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Yes what he said was harsh as well. But if you're politely disagreeing with someone you wouldn't use "philistine" or "materialistic." If you're flaming then say whatever, but you said those were observations so I interpret it as you do think people who follow fashion are philistines and materialistic even when those words aren't meant as insults.

If someone actually puts time and effort into having good taste in something, he'll actually be the opposite of a philistine. On the other hand, those who follow fashion might call those who don't philistines for not putting into any thought into how they dress. The general public don't care how they dress, so those who do are actually the minority.

Not that it really matters if you're mindlessly following the masses or saying fuck you to popular culture. I personally prefer the former because the latter is hard to do. You said people want material things because it makes them happy, otherwise they wouldn't do it. People do things for a variety of reasons beyond just happiness. Eudaimonia is a horribly ancient and naive concept. Even if people buy clothes to fulfill their lives, I don't see anything wrong with it. Are you gonna tell them how to live life and what happiness should be to them?

You and Baal are far from "dissidents" of culture just because you dislike throwing down for clothes. Transsexuals who are into S&M are dissidents, because their way of life and experience of society are truly different from just about every other person. You guys just disagree with fashion, not a big deal, we're entitled to our opinions.



I was returning the favor re: not being polite. It's not flaming. I didn't say people who follow fasion are absolute philistines, although I would think it is so in most of the cases, and my observations go beyond just that fact, because both iop and I have been on here for long before this argument, so they are based on more than just this thread.

We must have a completely different definition of a philistine if you believe that those who follow fashion could soundly call one who doesn't a philistine for that reason alone. It makes literally no sense at all. Yes, they might be in the minority, but how does this makes them not be philistines? How does being in the minority and caring about your appearance more than others indicate a real appreciation of aesthetics and philosophical/spiritual values? I don't get you at all.

You are entitled to your opinion re: Eudaimonia, but I doubt you can give me a solid argument as to how it is a naive concept. If you don't see anything wrong with "people buying clothes to fulfill their lives" it is because you are one of them. While I do see something wrong with that, it is only wrong for myself. I have my own way and people have theirs, I'm not here to tell people how to live. You are horribly naive if you believe I ever try to convert people to my own ideals. To each man his own meat and drink, but better to go astray than follow.

And that last thing about us not being dissidents is just a joke, really. I can't believe an intelligent person like you could even say that. Baal is an anarchist and you're saying he is not a dissident? And you know nothing of me and my experiences with society yet still posit such a ridiculous statement. I'm at a loss for words on this one.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 28/08/2010 21:47

Loco   Canada. Aug 28 2010 21:35. Posts 21022


  On August 28 2010 18:50 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Show nested quote +



Nigga every value you have is a socio-cultural value. You can't NOT be cultured. If you were born in some sort of society you will be like everyone else. There's nothing to fight here. If you want to experience the limits of society, you can either commit some crimes or take LSD, those are Foucauldian limit-experiences society does not offer. If you are not doing any of those things then you are living just like everyone else. I don't see what people are oblivious to. No one can judge the value of values except for the individual.



This is untrue. I agree that we are formed by those very values in our most sentient period, but not beyond. Our 'Ids' at birth are malleable by direction, discipline, transference, never by abuse or suppression. In addition, we inherit a basic pattern from our chromosomes and genes which is our essential individuality and also rectifiable. And there is the most potent of all - 'environment', which includes parents and everything associative and inflicted upon us at that period. All our early controls are forged and forced on us from it. These three fundamentals are in constant impact creating experiences, forming our complexities, frustrations, desires, good, evil, hate, temperament, character and the direction of our individuality, ethics and principles. After the dangerous transition from adolescence comes the opportunity to break or not the harness of these controls. I am not like everyone else because I have broken them; but I make no virtue of it.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount 

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 28 2010 22:40. Posts 1929

Philistine to me is basically devoid of culture, not having taste, etc. Fashion is an aesthetic discipline. So having taste in clothes, just like having taste in art, is the opposite of philistine in that sense. I understand your point of materialistic behavior vs spiritual values, but caring about clothes does not necessarily equal materialistic behavior. People who are into fashion can be materialistic. But by default, fashion requires an aesthetic sense. So philistine wouldn't be the word I think of to describe people who are into fashion.

I can write a lot about why I don't agree Eudaimonia is the telos of human life but we should probably save it for another thread. I personally don't spend a lot on clothes, I am not defending fashion because I am a materialist. I actually don't know anything about fashion. I just don't believe people who condemn this lifestyle have any higher wisdom.

I wasn't talking about Baal being an anarchist, and I obviously don't know how you live. I was just making the point that not liking clothes can hardly be considered dissident to anything. Most people in the world don't have the means to care about how they dress. Most people in the world live under a government though so Baal's stance would be considered somewhat unique.


zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 28 2010 22:57. Posts 1929


  On August 28 2010 20:35 Loco wrote:
Show nested quote +



This is untrue. I agree that we are formed by those very values in our most sentient period, but not beyond. Our 'Ids' at birth are malleable by direction, discipline, transference, never by abuse or suppression. In addition, we inherit a basic pattern from our chromosomes and genes which is our essential individuality and also rectifiable. And there is the most potent of all - 'environment', which includes parents and everything associative and inflicted upon us at that period. All our early controls are forged and forced on us from it. These three fundamentals are in constant impact creating experiences, forming our complexities, frustrations, desires, good, evil, hate, temperament, character and the direction of our individuality, ethics and principles. After the dangerous transition from adolescence comes the opportunity to break or not the harness of these controls. I am not like everyone else because I have broken them; but I make no virtue of it.



I don't disagree with the first part.

You clearly do regard breaking free of traditional values as a virtue. If you are not a criminal and you are not insane, you have inherited most of the societal values everyone else has. So in my perspective, you have not broken anything, neither has anyone else who posts on this forum. You may have taken on different values than the ones you were raised on, and doing so may be an achievement in your own right. But you have not transgressed the boundaries everyone lives within. You sleep in a house, you pay your taxes, you are a functional member of society.

From both a personal and philosophical point of view, I'd much rather enjoy life than fight it. There are too many cynics and not enough ones who are grateful.


Loco   Canada. Aug 28 2010 23:19. Posts 21022


  On August 28 2010 21:40 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Philistine to me is basically devoid of culture, not having taste, etc. Fashion is an aesthetic discipline. So having taste in clothes, just like having taste in art, is the opposite of philistine in that sense. I understand your point of materialistic behavior vs spiritual values, but caring about clothes does not necessarily equal materialistic behavior. People who are into fashion can be materialistic. But by default, fashion requires an aesthetic sense. So philistine wouldn't be the word I think of to describe people who are into fashion.

I can write a lot about why I don't agree Eudaimonia is the telos of human life but we should probably save it for another thread. I personally don't spend a lot on clothes, I am not defending fashion because I am a materialist. I actually don't know anything about fashion. I just don't believe people who condemn this lifestyle have any higher wisdom.

I wasn't talking about Baal being an anarchist, and I obviously don't know how you live. I was just making the point that not liking clothes can hardly be considered dissident to anything. Most people in the world don't have the means to care about how they dress. Most people in the world live under a government though so Baal's stance would be considered somewhat unique.



My definition of it is more particular, taken from wikipedia which describes it well:
"A person called a Philistine (in the relevant sense) is said to despise or undervalue art, beauty, intellectual content, or spiritual values. Philistines are also said to be materialistic, to favor conventional social values unthinkingly, and to favor forms of art that have a cheap and easy appeal (e.g. kitsch)."

To me, it is very right-minded to think that the people who care about clothes and are into fashion to the point of being condescending to those of us who do not value it, do exhibit those traits and perfectly fit the definition.

I don't even know why Eudaimonia was even brought into the subject. The point that I was making and that you took as Eudaimonia out of context can be ascribed very easily as such: How do they feel after buying expensive jewelry or expensive clothing? Do they feel unhappy, or are they indifferent, or are they happy? If they are happy, then it seems rather obvious to me than at least part of the purpose in the purchase was to make yourself happy. I don't think you will disagree with that.

Again, I do not condemn such a lifestyle. To each his own. I am not on a mission here, I condone much more than I ever condemn.

Of course not valuing fashion doesn't make me a dissident, but being a dissident makes me not value fashion, and being a dissident has shaped my life as it is today.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount 

Dogan0s   United States. Aug 28 2010 23:26. Posts 902

so many tl dr posts ..
like wtf , just suggest some brands , thats what this thread was made for-_-


zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 28 2010 23:51. Posts 1929

That definition and mine are mostly the same. Designing clothes is a creative endeavor so you can't say people who are fashionable undervalue art and beauty. Intellectual content and spiritual values don't have a lot to do with fashion, fashion in principle certainly doesn't betray those values. Materialistic, sometimes. Favoring conventional social values, being fashionable isn't really a conventional social value, maybe in Korea I guess. Forms of art that have cheap and easy appeal; doesn't really apply to fashion.

I still fail to see how fashionable people fit into that description. You can't really say everyone who's into fashion are condescending towards those who are not. That's based on your personal experience and is pretty much a prejudice.

Not gonna get into details but sure I agree. Most people get excited over some type of material thing. I can get excited over buying clothes and still have a fulfilling life. I don't understand what you absolutely refuse to agree with in principle. Are you following the Stoic doctrine? I know temperance is a virtue so do you regard people who spend a lot of money on clothes as intemperate?

If this thread was about how clothes are unnecessary would you come in here and argue the opposite because you are a dissident?

 Last edit: 28/08/2010 23:57

Loco   Canada. Aug 28 2010 23:57. Posts 21022


  On August 28 2010 21:57 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Show nested quote +



I don't disagree with the first part.

You clearly do regard breaking free of traditional values as a virtue. If you are not a criminal and you are not insane, you have inherited most of the societal values everyone else has. So in my perspective, you have not broken anything, neither has anyone else who posts on this forum. You may have taken on different values than the ones you were raised on, and doing so may be an achievement in your own right. But you have not transgressed the boundaries everyone lives within. You sleep in a house, you pay your taxes, you are a functional member of society.

From both a personal and philosophical point of view, I'd much rather enjoy life than fight it. There are too many cynics and not enough ones who are grateful.




"You clearly do regard breaking free of traditional values as a virtue." I would rather use the term 'conventional', and I don't. What I believe is that it is a necessity in the process of reformation to accomplish virtue in behaviour. I believe in straying to find one's own path rather than following the band-wagon, the manufactured pleasures and the thinking done for you. It is not meant to be gratifying, as you seem to believe, but done for its own sake. When I say that I have "broken them", I am not speaking of societal standards for living; or saying that I have achieved sovereignty; I am not talking about my place in society and being completely independent from it, you have misunderstood. I am talking about my individuality; about the controls and the corruption my Ids - influenced by early environment and associations - have had on me since birth, and stating that they are no longer in effect. This is very different, because as I have stated, the environment molds us initially, but then we can mold ourselves, which doesn't prevent us being part of society still, although it -reformation while being socially active - is extremely difficult in every case I can think of, unless you are an artist or have another occupation which allows you to.

I believe there is no greater virtue than to work hard at something for which one is well suited - and there is no better service to ourselves and others - than to enjoy our leisure our own way, generating our own truth and worth without argument, i.e, without forcing them on others or allowing others to inflict theirs on you. I believe in leading a full life, but am also disgusted at the actions of those who believe in 'living life to the fullest' which I more or less equate to living life to the foulest instead. I do not believe I am "fighting life" by negating common vain ideals and pleasures. I have more sympathies for the Cynic than the Hedonist, although I'm more of a believer in a life orbiting around aesthetics rather than asceticism.

Edit: I could've made it easier in my post by saying what I have broken from is, partly, society's impact on my will rather than society itself.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 29/08/2010 01:30

Loco   Canada. Aug 29 2010 00:22. Posts 21022


  On August 28 2010 22:51 zulu_nation8 wrote:
That definition and mine are mostly the same. Designing clothes is a creative endeavor so you can't say people who are fashionable undervalue art and beauty. Intellectual content and spiritual values don't have a lot to do with fashion, fashion in principle certainly doesn't betray those values. Materialistic, sometimes. Favoring conventional social values, being fashionable isn't really a conventional social value, maybe in Korea I guess. Forms of art that have cheap and easy appeal; doesn't really apply to fashion.

I still fail to see how fashionable people fit into that description. You can't really say everyone who's into fashion are condescending towards those who are not. That's based on your personal experience and is pretty much a prejudice.

Not gonna get into details but sure I agree. Most people get excited over some type of material thing. I can get excited over buying clothes and still have a fulfilling life. I don't understand what you absolutely refuse to agree with in principle. Are you following the Stoic doctrine? I know temperance is a virtue so do you regard people who spend a lot of money on clothes as intemperate?

If this thread was about how clothes are unnecessary would you come in here and argue the opposite because you are a dissident?



I guess I will be pegged as an art snob, but I do not relate in any way to the creativity and artistry of fashion designers. I do not respect their 'creative' visions. I do not see the beauty in it either. True art and creativity survives trends. Also, from my own perspective, modern things, whatever their style, are always under or over-rated. You can undervalue true art and beauty while still being creative - many do and they are easy to find because what they create is always going to be ugly in the eyes of those who can discern it. I guess we will just have to agree to disagree on this one.

"You can't really say everyone who's into fashion are condescending towards those who are not. That's based on your personal experience and is pretty much a prejudice" since I have never said such a thing I wasn't prejudiced. I have only said that iop had been.

I am Stoic always, saying I follow any-thing wouldn't be correct, though. Yes, intemperate seems to fit well. Again, though, I do not condemn it, after all I was once a person who would spend more than I should, and grasp more than I needed.

"If this thread was about how clothes are unnecessary would you come in here and argue the opposite because you are a dissident?"

By that logic I should oppose my own ideals too? Aren't you capable of understanding how I use a certain word without us defining every one of them? As far as I know being a dissident doesn't mean that I disagree with everything and that I always want to argue about everything. On the other hand it does hint that what I was imposed, or exposed to I have disagreed with. In a way it has more to do with nonconformism than just some vague disagreements for the sake of disagreeing.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 29/08/2010 00:41

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 29 2010 00:58. Posts 1929


  On August 28 2010 22:57 Loco wrote:
Show nested quote +



"You clearly do regard breaking free of traditional values as a virtue." I would rather use the term 'conventional', and I don't. What I believe is that it is a necessity in the process of reformation to accomplish virtue in behaviour. I believe in straying to find one's own path rather than following the band-wagon, the manufactured pleasures and the thinking done for you. It is not meant to be gratifying, as you seem to believe, but done for its own sake. When I say that I have "broken them", I am not speaking of societal standards for living; or saying that I have achieved sovereignty; I am not talking about my place in society and being completely independent from it, you have misunderstood. I am talking about my individuality; about the controls and the corruption my Ids - influenced by early environment and associations - have had on me since birth, and stating that they are no longer in effect. This is very different, because as I have stated, the environment molds us initially, but then we can mold ourselves, which doesn't prevent us being part of society still, although it -reformation while being socially active - is extremely difficult in every case I can think of, unless you are an artist or have another occupation which allows you to.

I believe there is no greater virtue than to work hard at something for which one is well suited - and there is no better service to ourselves and others - than to enjoy our leisure our own way, generating our own truth and worth without argument, i.e, without forcing them on others or allowing others to inflict theirs on you. I believe in leading a full life, but am also disgusted at the actions of those who believe in 'living life to the fullest' which I more or less equate to living life to the foulest instead. I do not believe I am "fighting life" by negating common vain ideals and pleasures. I have more sympathies for the Cynic than the Hedonist, although I'm more of a believer in a life orbiting around aesthetics rather than asceticism.

Edit: I could've made it easier in my post by saying what I have broken from (partly) is society's impact on my will rather than society itself.



The values most people are raised upon are not necessarily bad, in fact they are helpful to becoming part of society. If for example you were raised as a Christian but later became an atheist, sure you broke free of your upbringing and like I said it maybe a tremendous personal accomplishment. However there's no reason to view others according to how you live. A person can have wonderful parents and was raised on conventional values that help him to live a fulfilling life. That person probably doesn't feel the need to transform himself. Someone else may have grown up in an abusive household so he'd want to put his past behind. Neither life is better than the other. Neither life is more fulfilling than the other.

I disagree about the individuality you describe. Everyone is unique. Just because someone does not transfigure himself does not make him any less of an individual. To repeat myself, if you are not a criminal, an insane person, or a genius, you are not more of an individual than anyone else. The life you experience is similar to those around you. Your basic values, sexuality, sense of beauty, obligations, bodily pleasures, they are parts of every person molded by family and society most people do not and can not ever change. Your ambitions, political stance, hobbies, personal philosophy, those are the superficial make up that can be rewritten upon will. They do not change your basic experience. You may read Marquis De Sade and listen to horrorcore, but you're still having sex like everyone else and not murdering people, you're not that much different.

When I mentioned cynicism I am referring to a deep mistrust in life, a quality you seem to advocate. Those who are not cynical tend to be more accepting, and less suspicious. Someone who takes life at face value is not necessarily a philistine, he may merely understand there is nothing behind the world you are so suspicious of, and therefore not care either way. You don't want to force your truth upon others, but you are disgusted by those who live differently than you. There is certainly more than one way to live for everyone. No one, especially not the moral philosophers have the authority to place value on life, to dictate what is the good life and what is not. If you want to doubt something, start with stoics.

 Last edit: 29/08/2010 01:50

Loco   Canada. Aug 29 2010 01:22. Posts 21022


  On August 28 2010 23:58 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Show nested quote +



The values most people are raised upon are not necessarily bad, in fact they are helpful to becoming part of society. If for example you were raised as a Christian but later became an atheist, sure you broke free of your upbringing and like I said it maybe a tremendous personal accomplishment. However there's no reason to view others according to how you live. A person can have wonderful parents and was raised on conventional values that help him to live a fulfilling life. That person probably doesn't feel the need to transform himself. Someone else may have grown up in an abusive household so he'd want to put his past behind. Neither life is better than the other. Neither life is more fulfilling than the other.

I disagree about the individuality you describe. Everyone is unique. Just because someone does not transfigure himself does not make him any less of an individual. To repeat myself, if you are not a criminal, an insane person, or a genius, you are not more of an individual than anyone else. The life you experience is similar to those around you. Your basic values, sexuality, sense of beauty, obligations, bodily pleasures, they are parts of every person molded by family and society most people do not and can not ever change. Your ambitions, political stance, hobbies, personal philosophy, those are the superficial make up that can be rewritten upon will. They do not change your basic experience. You may read Marquis De Sade and listen to horrorcore, but you're still having sex like everyone else and not murdering people, you're not that much different.

When I mentioned cynicism I am referring to a deep mistrust in life, a quality you seem to advocate. Those who are not cynical tend to be more accepting, and less suspicious. Someone who takes life at face value is not necessarily a philistine, he may merely understand there is nothing behind the world you are so suspicious of, and therefore not care either way. You don't want to force your truth upon others, but you are disgusted by those who live differently than you. There is certainly more than one way to live for everyone. No one, especially not the moral philosophers have the authority to place value on life, to dictate what is the good life and what is not. If you want to doubt something, start with stoics.



"The values most people are raised upon are not necessarily bad, in fact they are helpful to becoming part of society. If for example you were raised as a Christian but later became an atheist, sure you broke free of your upbringing and like I said it maybe a tremendous personal accomplishment. However there's no reason to view others according to how you live. A person can have wonderful parents and was raised on conventional values that help him to live a fulfilling life. That person probably doesn't feel the need to transform himself. Someone else may have grown up in an abusive household so he'd want to put his past behind. Neither life is better than the other. Neither life is more fulfilling than the other."


I guess we will have to agree to disagree, because I have observed otherwise. They are useful to become a part of society, but they never allow one to express his full potential. Reformation and proper education, on the other hand, makes one a humanist, which is indefinitely more valuable to both the individual and society. But it requires effort and god knows we don't like that word nowadays. The easy way is the common way.

Sure, I'm not here to argue who can lead a fulfilling life and who can't. I'd rather argue who behaves in a way that makes him an improver rather than a swine. Swines can be happy, too, but this never was the question.

"I disagree about the individuality you describe. Everyone is unique. Just because someone does not transfigure himself does not make him any less of an individual. To repeat myself, if you are not a criminal, an insane person, or a genius, you are not more of an individual than anyone else. The life you experience is similar to those around you. Your basic values, sexuality, sense of beauty, obligations, bodily pleasures, they are parts of every person molded by family and society most people do not and can not ever change. Your ambitions, political stance, hobbies, personal philosophy, those are the superficial make up that can be rewritten upon will. They do not change your basic experience. You may read Marquis De Sade and listen to horrorcore, but you're still having sex like everyone else and not murdering people, you're not that much different."

Since when does being different equate being more of a person? You talk to me as if I was the 15 year old kid who blasts Marilyn Manson on a constant basis and hates everyone and feels superior to his mates because he's in pain and understands very little of himself. Was I to take any of it personally I would find it offensive and insulting. I don't really understand what you're trying to do here, are you trying to make me realize something? Should I boast about myself and distinguish myself from others as being better? Why has this become so personal suddenly? I would rather leave the self-righteousness to others who know no better. My ambitions, political stance, hobbies and personal philosophy you know nothing of. My philosophy is organic, and based on vital belief - yet you speak to me as if I had subscribed to some dogma or word tawdry phantasmagoria.

"When I mentioned cynicism I am referring to a deep mistrust in life, a quality you seem to advocate. Those who are not cynical tend to be more accepting, and less suspicious. Someone who takes life at face value is not necessarily a philistine, he may merely understand there is nothing behind the world you are so suspicious of, and therefore not care either way. You don't want to force your truth upon others, but you are disgusted by those who live differently than you. There is certainly more than one way to live for everyone. No one, especially not the moral philosophers have the authority to place value on life, to dictate what is the good life and what is not. If you want to doubt something, start with stoics."

If you had said a mistrust in others, or in common ideas, maybe, but life? not the case, or I wouldn't still be here. I am indeed often disgusted by the actions of people, I am disgusted by evil actions and this does not exclude my own. Yes, there are many ways to live life, does that mean that I should be tolerant of the actions of everyone, and never express my opinion, or never act on what I believe to be just? I'm not sure what you are trying to do again, turn me into someone passive who smiles at everything and just "trusts life" - whatever that means?

Kindly keep your advices for me to yourself. If 'everyone is unique', I don't get why are you trying so hard to make me realize how similar I am to others?

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 29/08/2010 02:28

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 29 2010 02:13. Posts 1929

LP lost the post before this one when I tried to edit it so I had to rewrite most of it.

Fashion is a legit art, there's no reason to think it's not. You're basically being condescending. Just because something isn't trendy does not mean it's not good. Fashion designers can't undervalue art and beauty because fashion is an art. You're basically saying you don't agree with their aesthetic sense therefore they are philistines. It's like saying I hate impressionism so I don't regard Monet as an artist, he also undervalues art and beauty, because my idea of art and beauty are different. This entire thing has just been about people who have different values than you and Baal but you insist you're actually justified in condemning the value of others because you see things differently.


whamm!   Albania. Aug 29 2010 02:28. Posts 11625


  On August 24 2010 15:30 BangYu wrote:
After wearing abercrombie since highschool, im trying to switch my style. Something to like express? I like a lot of their clothes but was wondering where do you guys shop. How much you drop on clothes.
And if any of you have any nice stores/sites that arent too expensive u like to shop at.






can't go wrong dressing your age. basic gap, banana republic, urban outfitters vintage tees, munsingwear, fred perry , decent phone(with text preferably touchscreen lol), watch is optional, uncombed hair look
i think you'll blend in, live a normal life and prob have a girl or two . gg thread


Loco   Canada. Aug 29 2010 02:40. Posts 21022


  On August 29 2010 01:13 zulu_nation8 wrote:
LP lost the post before this one when I tried to edit it so I had to rewrite most of it.

Fashion is a legit art, there's no reason to think it's not. You're basically being condescending. Just because something isn't trendy does not mean it's not good. Fashion designers can't undervalue art and beauty because fashion is an art. You're basically saying you don't agree with their aesthetic sense therefore they are philistines. It's like saying I hate impressionism so I don't regard Monet as an artist, he also undervalues art and beauty, because my idea of art and beauty are different. This entire thing has just been about people who have different values than you and Baal but you insist you're actually justified in condemning the value of others because you see things differently.



'Fashion is a legit art' is this a fact or your opinion? There is a reason for me to think that it is not. Whether you share it or not, who cares? I can write a whole paragraph on what I believe qualifies as real art and why, but it's useless. You're only throwing generalizations constantly, and taking what I say and making it into something else having me rectify everything. My idea, no matter how much I hate generalizing, is that most people who are into fashion are materialists, and most materialists are philistines. You are free to disagree - there is no way for me to prove this, so arguing about it all day is not getting us anywhere. But if you want to prove me wrong, please show me a few philosophers or great spiritual figures who were also fashionable, if not then please don't bring it up again.

I am not condemning any goddamn thing - go wear whatever you want and see how I care. The only reason I came into this thread was because of Baal. I had no interest in this discussion at all before his argument. You are being so unbelievably defensive for someone who's not even into fashion.

"You're basically saying you don't agree with their aesthetic sense therefore they are philistines. It's like saying I hate impressionism so I don't regard Monet as an artist, he also undervalues art and beauty, because my idea of art and beauty are different."

As usual, it seems, it's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying in fact that these people are artists, but that their art is ugly, has no meaning, is not vital and is factually nothing more than an exhibition of incapacity when compared to the great works of art, and so is anything that does not survive trends.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 29/08/2010 02:51

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 29 2010 02:50. Posts 1929

Loco when I say your ambition and political stance I don't actually mean Loco's ambition and political stance, I was speaking in general. I mind as well have replaced "your" with "someone's".

When you call people philistines and materialists and talk about spiritual values and living a fulfilling life I interpret that as you regarding your own values as superior. Not a very farfetched leap I made. I don't know why you're upset. This was never personal. I gave the examples to prove a point. I don't care what your political ambitions or personal philosophies are.

What does it mean to hate evil actions? Your values are your own, what you regard as evil is your own matter. You seem to think very subjective matters like living a life can be universally judged. My point is it can't. You shouldn't be tolerant for the sake of it but because you realize certain things can not be judged.

If you want to suddenly act like I'm trying to insult you then do what you want.


zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 29 2010 03:01. Posts 1929


  On August 29 2010 01:40 Loco wrote:
Show nested quote +



'Fashion is a legit art' is this a fact or your opinion? There is a reason for me to think that it is not. Whether you share it or not, who cares? I can write a whole paragraph on what I believe qualifies as real art and why, but it's useless. You're only throwing generalizations constantly, and taking what I say and making it into something else having me rectify everything. My idea, no matter how much I hate generalizing, is that most people who are into fashion are materialists, and most materialists are philistines. You are free to disagree - there is no way for me to prove this, so arguing about it all day is not getting us anywhere. But if you want to prove me wrong, please show me a few philosophers or great spiritual figures who were also fashionable, if not then please don't bring it up again.

I am not condemning any goddamn thing - go wear whatever you want and see how I care. The only reason I came into this thread was because of Baal. I had no interest in this discussion at all before his argument. You are being so unbelievably defensive for someone who's not even into fashion.

"You're basically saying you don't agree with their aesthetic sense therefore they are philistines. It's like saying I hate impressionism so I don't regard Monet as an artist, he also undervalues art and beauty, because my idea of art and beauty are different."

As usual, it seems, it's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying in fact that these people are artists, but that their art is ugly, has no meaning, is not vital and is factually nothing more than an exhibition of incapacity when compared to the great works of art, and so is anything that does not survive trends.


I think Kierkegaard was pretty fashionable. Why can't people like clothes and be spiritual, intellectual, creative, and whatever virtues you abide by, what is wrong with simply having nice clothes?

And yes you seem to not like a certain art because it disagrees with whatever idea of aesthetics you have. I don't wanna argue about the definition but basically you are prejudiced towards fashion.


  On August 26 2010 04:24 Loco wrote:
seems to me that he doesn't buy it that you are wearing certain clothes for the unique purpose of functionality in your life, because that would sound as if you were suddenly placed in a moment and time and you had to act a part as a life. seems much more likely that your job, friends and activities revolve around where you are placing your values and it is those very values that are being targeted here because they are deemed to be contemptible. it would be hard to believe for anyone that a person who spends so much money on material possessions and decorating oneself doesn't have his self-worth revolve around it, and also very unlikely that he's not really conforming internally while conforming externally.



I think that's condemning

 Last edit: 29/08/2010 03:09

Loco   Canada. Aug 29 2010 03:10. Posts 21022


  On August 29 2010 01:50 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Loco when I say your ambition and political stance I don't actually mean Loco's ambition and political stance, I was speaking in general. I mind as well have replaced "your" with "someone's".

When you call people philistines and materialists and talk about spiritual values and living a fulfilling life I interpret that as you regarding your own values as superior. Not a very farfetched leap I made. I don't know why you're upset. This was never personal. I gave the examples to prove a point. I don't care what your political ambitions or personal philosophies are.

What does it mean to hate evil actions? Your values are your own, what you regard as evil is your own matter. You seem to think very subjective matters like living a life can be universally judged. My point is it can't. You shouldn't be tolerant for the sake of it but because you realize certain things can not be judged.

If you want to suddenly act like I'm trying to insult you then do what you want.



I have not taken any of it personal - but it seems like it was your purpose for it to be so.

I am not a saint, apostle or a gospeller - I am never superior. For me there is nothing but my way, so it would be hypocritical of me not to believe that others have only their way as well. My Ideals (whether I live up to them or not) are better than the common ones, but that does not make me superior.

I do not believe in amoralism, neither do I believe in an indistinguishable good and evil; therefore I believe in my own abilities to judge what is good and evil, and live accordingly. You are not teaching me anything when you tell me that what I regard as evil is my own matter. And yet, no matter how much you would try to convince everyone here that rape is not evil, you would fail, even though 'evil is subjective'. You can say these things, and be a spieler, but if tomorrow you go out and see someone kicking his dog to death - you would not have this talk with the person in question, and you would feel it is your duty to intervene if you are even half a man.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 29/08/2010 03:58

Loco   Canada. Aug 29 2010 03:18. Posts 21022


  On August 29 2010 02:01 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Show nested quote +



I think Kierkegaard was pretty fashionable. Why can't people like clothes and be spiritual, intellectual, creative, and whatever virtues you abide by, what is wrong with simply having nice clothes?



And yes you seem to not like a certain art because it disagrees with whatever idea of aesthetics you have. I don't wanna argue about the definition but basically you are prejudiced towards fashion.




  On August 26 2010 04:24 Loco wrote:
seems to me that he doesn't buy it that you are wearing certain clothes for the unique purpose of functionality in your life, because that would sound as if you were suddenly placed in a moment and time and you had to act a part as a life. seems much more likely that your job, friends and activities revolve around where you are placing your values and it is those very values that are being targeted here because they are deemed to be contemptible. it would be hard to believe for anyone that a person who spends so much money on material possessions and decorating oneself doesn't have his self-worth revolve around it, and also very unlikely that he's not really conforming internally while conforming externally.



I think that's condemning



It would be if I was speaking for myself rather than Baal. Baal is condemning here, I am not Baal. Re-read the post. I might not value it but I do not condemn people who do - I would rather just not have anything to do with them - as I'm sure in most cases they wouldn't like to have anything to do with a person who dresses like a poor man, i.e; myself. There is too much that I personally disagree with, and if I was to actively condemn it all I would waste all my energy on that alone. Much better is it to condone and move on.


"I think Kierkegaard was pretty fashionable. Why can't people like clothes and be spiritual, intellectual, creative, and whatever virtues you abide by, what is wrong with simply having nice clothes?"

Having 'nice clothes' is different from putting fashion at the forefront of one's life and where you spend most of your money. This, to me, is contemptible, not just having nice clothes. If you do not realize this difference then I am sorry, I do not wish to argue this any more.

"And yes you seem to not like a certain art because it disagrees with whatever idea of aesthetics you have. I don't wanna argue about the definition but basically you are prejudiced towards fashion."

Yes, however you want to put it, I am difficult when it comes to art.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 29/08/2010 03:32

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 29 2010 03:22. Posts 1929

yes dude, i agree rape is evil, fashion can be subjective though, thus the discussion. Most people don't give a shit about clothes so you're actually conforming. If you really feel it's your duty to intervene when people spend money on consumer products then I don't know what to say. Leave those people alone I guess.


Loco   Canada. Aug 29 2010 03:30. Posts 21022


  On August 29 2010 02:22 zulu_nation8 wrote:
yes dude, i agree rape is evil, fashion can be subjective though, thus the discussion. Most people don't give a shit about clothes so you're actually conforming. If you really feel it's your duty to intervene when people spend money on consumer products then I don't know what to say. Leave those people alone I guess.



I give a shit about clothes. I want them to be simple, plain, unobtrusive and keep me either warm or well ventilated when it is warm outside. It would be inconvenient if the only clothes I had access to did not fit these criterias; therefore I care about clothes, so I am not conforming after all it would seem.


"" If you really feel it's your duty to intervene when people spend money on consumer products then I don't know what to say. Leave those people alone I guess""


  On August 28 2010 17:41 Loco wrote:
Show nested quote +





I completely agree with you about rationalization, but I believe you are mistaking if you believe that having a consumerist lifestyle has anything to do with one's own idiosyncrasies. It is not unique to his own, it is a borrowed habit coming from socio-cultural values. For that reason it is something that is embraced or abandoned. Baal is in a heroic mission in his mind to help people realize things about themselves that they are oblivious to, and sadly that is not his job and only arouses antagony. I have been guilty of the same. He doesn't mean any wrong with it.


This should tell you that I do not believe it is my duty, nor should it be anybody else's, but I have indeed been guilty of it in the past and have rectified my behavior.

The difference between me and Baal it would seem is that I can condone and be tolerant of whatever people do, for as long as it causes no injury to anyone or anything, whereas Baal in his mind has the answers and if people are not living vis-a-vis his ideals and values, they are directly the cause of all that is wrong with the world and since he believes in an utopia, he feels like it is his duty to rectify them and make them realize things to have a better community, and if others would do the same we would have a better world. Very idealistic. This is only my impression though, I might be wrong. I differ because I am a strong believer of teaching by the act instead of the word, which explains why I am not in favor of any militanism.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 29/08/2010 07:16

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 29 2010 03:39. Posts 1929

Last post. I know you believe differently. But whether people live materialistically or spiritually, religiously or non religiously, intellectually or like a philistine, does not matter to me. I think they can all be good and fulfilling. Stoics actually seem to be the ones who don't give a shit about anything except for virtue/vice. Of course what I regard to be virtues are different but fashion would seem to fall under the indifferent.


Loco   Canada. Aug 29 2010 03:54. Posts 21022

Stoics have perhaps been the most misunderstood philosophers in modern days. It is no wonder most people believe that being stoic is all about repressing emotions and having a stiff upper lip. I do not believe you are doing them justice by not studying the great Roman Stoics, i.e; Seneca, Marcus Aurelius, Epictetus, more in depths, and all my favorite modern philosophers seemed to have a lot of sympathies for them and believe much of what they were saying was right-minded, especially my favorite pessimists, Cioran and Schopenhauer.

I'm not one to defend others, but I do know that they were everything but people who didn't give a shit. They gave a shit about what mattered the most, human freedom, and they lived - embodied - their philosophy until their last breaths. They were noble people. Are you also against Buddhism and other such enlightenment philosophies because they 'do not give a shit about anything'? Just curious. Seeing as how this no longer relates to fashion at all you might just want to PM me.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 29/08/2010 04:05

kemo   Denmark. Aug 29 2010 06:50. Posts 573

Ive never seen so much text on one page


whamm!   Albania. Aug 29 2010 06:54. Posts 11625

thread had an awesome ending too


lucifer   Sweden. Aug 29 2010 08:13. Posts 5955


  On August 29 2010 01:13 zulu_nation8 wrote:
When something is trendy it is always horrible.



Stayed away for a while. But I just had to fix that.




edit: original

  On August 29 2010 01:13 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Just because something isn't trendy does not mean it's not good.




When something becomes a trend. It starts to detoriate.

On February 19 2009 22:21 Confedrate wrote: i dont get itLast edit: 29/08/2010 08:16

Loco   Canada. Aug 29 2010 09:25. Posts 21022

I assumed he just made a mistake with that sentence and meant "is trendy".

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount 

lebowski   Greece. Aug 29 2010 09:47. Posts 9205

I'm with zulu for the most part,this thread is interesting in general. How can pessimists like Schopenhauer be favorites for you Loco

new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... 

Loco   Canada. Aug 29 2010 10:50. Posts 21022

Maybe because I am extremely pessimistic? Has that not crossed your mind? Or maybe because I live the same lifestyle he favored (negating desires). If this hasn't been made apparent to you already then I don't know what to say. Watch the film I sent to you a while ago and you will understand me a little better.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 29/08/2010 12:07

EvilSky    Czech Republic. Aug 29 2010 12:52. Posts 8918

Holy bricks of text !!! I think baal has a tendency to take things to ridiculous extremes and the rest follows, from the replies here you would think its a civil rights movement for fashion.
Its like if you hear your buddy go "thats so 2006" without any sarcasm, you call him a fag and make fun of him but there is no real hatred there. People dressing a certain way because some idiots said so is just silly to me and I poke fun but its not like Im gonna gather a bunch of friends and go beat up those people either...


zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 29 2010 14:53. Posts 1929

Obv I'm not a fan of Schopenhauer, he's the boss ascetic philosopher. I find those guys really strange. What film are you talking about Loco?


rednalluk   Sweden. Aug 29 2010 16:23. Posts 626

I like the jeans from TOPMAN, but thats probably only because I can wear the "skinny" ones.
Also, I'd recommend anyone who doesnt know much about what to wear and who doesnt have a friend that can help them, to go to a store that looks like it has clothes you'd be comfortable wearing and ask the people working in the store what your type clothes they think would fit your body. Do NOT buy stuff that are "in fashion" unless they fit your body and are comfortable. Not only is it pretty easy to spot that you dont fit in them, but its even easier to spot that you tried to be fashionable but never considered if you would be comfortable wearing them.

And I truly do not see the point in arguing about whether fashion is good or not. What is the point of arguing that fashion is bad, he/she is gay for knowing some brands or like to dress good, except for the whole "arguments over internet is like competing in the paralympics"-factor? Does it make you feel cool or whatever to throw around phrases like "thats gay"? Whatever...

I like to dress nice. If you like to dress like a bum because you feel like making point that you dont wear what others tell you, then fine. But that line of thinking pretty much has no ending, and can be transfered to a lot of other items/stuff which makes you look like you try too much to be alternative. I dont know about Baal (just picking you because you wrote a lot) but if you're comfortable not having nice clothes thats fine (I hope you know what im getting at here, its not personal or a "value statement". But I really dont see how the point in arguing that its this or that. It just is. A tool to be used, or not used the way you see fit, and as long as you're not trapped in some kind of rediculous "I need to by this seasons clothes just because bla bla"-circle I see nothing wrong with it.

And now I wrote a post that became too long for anyone to bother reading. Sorry for the ramble.


rednalluk   Sweden. Aug 29 2010 16:25. Posts 626


  On August 29 2010 07:13 lucifer wrote:
Show nested quote +



Stayed away for a while. But I just had to fix that.




edit: original

  On August 29 2010 01:13 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Just because something isn't trendy does not mean it's not good.




When something becomes a trend. It starts to detoriate.


That kind of thinking just shows that you really dont wear the clothes because you're comfortable with them but because someone told you to wear them and when everyone else started doing it you became "less unique". If that's what you're going for, then fine, but I think you are wrong and that you're putting too much stock in what clothes can do for you. Or I just misinterpreted what you wrote.


rednalluk   Sweden. Aug 29 2010 16:41. Posts 626


  On August 28 2010 19:15 Baal wrote:
Show nested quote +



this is absurd, while the "norm" is indeed to inherit irrational values from your culture that is stupid and the objective is to have none of them.

And i am not free of all of them but im free from many and ive freed myself from many indoctrinations like fashion, religion, government among many others.

Do you realize that so much of this worlds suffering comes from that?, wars, hatred, racism etc, they were values indoctrinated by their society and people with low level of awareness do not judge and take them as truths without questioning them.


Question fashion, tell me why it is reasonable to follow and devote a good chunk of your money on such a ridiculous thing.



If it wasnt for this thread being about fashion I'd like you to expand. You are aware of how good Mexico fares without proper government, right?


Loco   Canada. Aug 29 2010 22:09. Posts 21022


  On August 29 2010 13:53 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Obv I'm not a fan of Schopenhauer, he's the boss ascetic philosopher. I find those guys really strange. What film are you talking about Loco?





nihilistic/existential masterpiece, doubt you would enjoy it though.

Schopenhauer is the 2nd modern philosopher I have the most affinities to. The first one is much weirder.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 30/08/2010 06:12

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 29 2010 23:10. Posts 1929

whos the first one? Schopenhauer has nothing to do with existentialism though nor nihilism.


whamm!   Albania. Aug 29 2010 23:27. Posts 11625

"...sometimes the clothes do not make the man..."

-George Michael (freedom 90)



Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Loco   Canada. Aug 29 2010 23:49. Posts 21022


  On August 29 2010 22:10 zulu_nation8 wrote:
whos the first one? Schopenhauer has nothing to do with existentialism though nor nihilism.



I know that, and I am not a nihilist, and the one philosopher I relate to the most (Austin Osman Spare) thought of them as being invalids, and "self-deceived egotists who are useless". Nihilism was just a part of the journey and something that was inevitable for me, it was felt, slowly and longly experienced and finally surmounted. I have lived the existential dilemma long before I have studied it, and it was the result of living in the way Schopenhauer very much favored, as did the Vedantists, Buddhists and the Stoics-- thus me having affinities with him.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 30/08/2010 00:28

Jhyun88   United States. Aug 30 2010 01:46. Posts 1383

I love LP....

Just curious Loco, what's your occupation? if you don't mind answering. I'm nowhere as knowledgeable about this stuff as you are but I think I can relate to being a huge pessimist and maybe developing into a nihilist unknowingly. It may be because my lack of self-confidence or sufficient knowledge about life or the subject at hand, but I feel like that the above traits are starting to have negative effect on my psychological well-being as well as life in general. I'm only 21 years old Uni student --;


ggplz   Sweden. Aug 30 2010 03:08. Posts 16784


  On August 29 2010 21:09 Loco wrote:
Show nested quote +





nihilistic/existential masterpiece, doubt you would enjoy it though.

Schopenhauer is the 2nd philosopher I have the most affinities to. The first one is much weirder.


this is good

if poker is dangerous to them i would rank sports betting as a Kodiak grizzly bear who smells blood after you just threw a javelin into his cub - RaiNKhAN 

Loco   Canada. Aug 30 2010 03:33. Posts 21022

I don't have one, I am an autodidact, and an hermit for the time being, partly out of choice and partly out of compulsion. I have always been a 'natural pessimist' but always attempted to keep an optimistic attitude during most of my life, as that seemed to be the way to go in society, and because I was afraid of being (even more) depressed if I were to indulge in my pessimism. Surprisingly enough, I figured out that just being myself, my natural pessimistic self, made me enjoy life more than deluding myself and trying to force a positive outlook on life. Being a pessimist for me is not about being negative all the time and constantly telling negative stuff about myself. It's not an an immature or juvenile pessimism born out of ignorance. It's just a general outlook; I am fascinated by death, I contemplate my own death constantly, the death of others, the impermanence of things, etc. and am constantly doing 'negative visualization' which is something I only learned later that the Stoics advocated as a daily practice. You can read about this psychological technique here.


If you like the film that I posted, you will most likely like Tarkovsky's Stalker (film) and Camus' The Stranger (book), both classic works.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 30/08/2010 03:38

qwerty67890   New Zealand. Aug 30 2010 05:07. Posts 14026

yeah but what brand of jeans do you wear?


Loco   Canada. Aug 30 2010 06:09. Posts 21022

hahaha

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount 

sawseech   Canada. Aug 30 2010 06:51. Posts 3182

buy 20 affliction shirts and a trucker cap and ballitout

lets go fucking mental la la la la lets go fucking mental lets go fucking mental lala la la 

sawseech   Canada. Aug 30 2010 06:52. Posts 3182

am i the only person here who understands exactly what loco is talking about?

lets go fucking mental la la la la lets go fucking mental lets go fucking mental lala la la 

Loco   Canada. Aug 30 2010 07:20. Posts 21022

I just read your "white rabbit" blog casper and it was a very good read. FM is by far the one thing I am most worried about.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount 

qwerty67890   New Zealand. Aug 30 2010 07:32. Posts 14026


  On August 30 2010 05 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              30 2010 05      end_of_the_skype_highlighting:51 sawseech wrote:
buy 20 affliction shirts and a trucker cap and ballitout



I like the affliction designs, do i automatically become a douche if i get some?


Loco   Canada. Aug 30 2010 07:52. Posts 21022



should answer your question

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount 

lucifer   Sweden. Aug 30 2010 11:02. Posts 5955


  On August 29 2010 15:25 rednalluk wrote:
Show nested quote +



That kind of thinking just shows that you really dont wear the clothes because you're comfortable with them but because someone told you to wear them and when everyone else started doing it you became "less unique". If that's what you're going for, then fine, but I think you are wrong and that you're putting too much stock in what clothes can do for you. Or I just misinterpreted what you wrote.



I only wear things I'm comfortable in.

But you're confusing me now. Wearing what other people say and think you should wear is what leads to trends?


Come on. You are also a swede. You can't say all the clones out there doesn't annoy you on at least some level?

On February 19 2009 22:21 Confedrate wrote: i dont get it 

Fayth    Canada. Aug 30 2010 12:59. Posts 10085

Seems like nowadays 50%+ of the clothes I wear are "Lacoste", it just seems to fit my skinny shape better than most clothes I've found out there, I like the looks of most of it as well...

Though I might be compensating for the lack of clothes I had when I was a kid since my parents couldn't afford much

Im not sure what to do tomorrow when I see her, should I shake her hand?? -Floofy 

thumbz555   United States. Aug 30 2010 13:29. Posts 3281

Abercrombie.... dude... wow. Some epic fail you had there. I rock Express, dropped about $600 there in the last two months and got a lot of nice stuff. Express gear is fitted, so if you're in good shape buy it, if not, don't. Just my 2c

I click buttons. 

rednalluk   Sweden. Aug 30 2010 17:26. Posts 626


  On August 30 2010 10:02 lucifer wrote:
Show nested quote +



I only wear things I'm comfortable in.

But you're confusing me now. Wearing what other people say and think you should wear is what leads to trends?


Come on. You are also a swede. You can't say all the clones out there doesn't annoy you on at least some level?



They do annoy me, but since I still buy it if i think it fits me that is not a factor in what to buy/not to buy. In fact I dont like most people who think that that you can express themselves by what they're wearing (before getting to know them, once in awhile they're pretty damn cool people too hang out with despite an overtrust in what fashion can do for their personality).

I thought that you meant that you didnt wear what was too trendy because it was too trendy. Like, you listen to a band and when they get played on the radio you stop because its too commercial or whatever. Probably not what you meant, but I was probably not reading well and semitilted after the whole "fashion is gay" thing.

On another note, the affliction tshirt shown above is pretty meh in my opinion if you're going for a type of tshirt to buy 10+ of. Id much rather have 10 from superdry


vltava   United States. Aug 30 2010 17:48. Posts 1742



It has a watermark and everything.

tooker: there is very little money in stts. Last edit: 30/08/2010 17:57

Raidern   Brasil. Aug 30 2010 19:03. Posts 4248

this looks good, yes, but i dont like to be a walking ad
unless its for TL LP :D

im a regular at nl5 

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 30 2010 21:38. Posts 1929

You're not really deluding yourself by being optimistic any more than you are by being pessimistic. There's no true perspective to strive towards. Your worldview is basically a symptom of who you are. You're not reasoning towards it or anything.


hiems   United States. Aug 30 2010 23:08. Posts 2979

This is the stupidest thread ever.

I beat Loco!!! [img]https://i.imgur.com/wkwWj2d.png[/img] 

Loco   Canada. Aug 30 2010 23:28. Posts 21022


  On August 30 2010 20:38 zulu_nation8 wrote:
You're not really deluding yourself by being optimistic any more than you are by being pessimistic. There's no true perspective to strive towards. Your worldview is basically a symptom of who you are. You're not reasoning towards it or anything.



Not necessarily I know, but if you do believe in positive thinking and other new age crap then yes - this is the optimism that I am talking about. Many of the modern optimists, and especially the spiritualists, live in lalaland, believing that their thoughts affect the outside reality or other such absurdities, and yet it is better than nothing at all since it conveys ability, no matter how untrue, it becomes useful fictionalism. Optimism doesn't serve me - I would much rather expect the worst and be pleasantly surprised when a situation turns out well. The advantage of having such practices can be easily verified if you play high stakes poker as I did. If I tell myself that I'm going to win a hand because I'm a 95% favorite or so then I'm doing a disservice to myself and am only going to be upset when I lose 5% of the time. If I immediately tell myself "well, it's a probability that I'll lose, that's just how it is..." then I won't be bothered when I do, no matter how large a sum I might have won. Same can be obviously applied in every situation, example if I lose a big hand and I remind myself he can hit and run me at any time and there's nothing I can do about it other than try to play well while he's here, instead of telling myself "he is so fucking bad I'm definitely going to make it all back". One keeps you calm and rational, the other might make you want to have a room with a lot of fruits and baseball bats.

Your overall play is going to be much better when you don't focus and consciously seek positive results, but prepare with in mind that things are very likely to not go in your favor, and you don't need to be fortuitous, efforts are enough to satisfy - you have no care in the world about if you win or not. Thinking becomes much clearer when you don't have emotions in the way -- irrational emotions-- meaning emotions that come into existence from irrationality -- so often seen exhibited by poker players, e.g., anger arising from "I should've won that", "I deserved that", etc. While this is just common sense, how many do overcome that through cold passion? And how much do we struggle with it initially and how badly does it influence our play?

There's always a perspective to strive towards if you perceive it will serve you better. The human being is the most plastic thing on earth, and much of what we do and think is modifiable and/or rectifiable. There is no right or wrong perspective, there is only what serves us and may serve others as well.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 31/08/2010 00:13

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 31 2010 00:31. Posts 1929

Well your poker example doesn't really sound like pessimism. I would think pessimism would be like thinking you're gonna lose every time you're flipping or a favorite. What you describe seem to be just approaching poker rationally instead of emotionally, and not being results-oriented. Even from the little poker I've played compared to you I obv agree. But if what I describe is pessimism, I'm sure you can see how that's not a very good mindset to have if you wanna play your A game. Optimism in this case wouldn't really be thinking you're gonna win every flip either, although that wouldn't hurt. It would probably be a general mindset of looking at things from brighter perspective to keep your morale up. This mindset doesn't have to be irrational, but just certain stuff like encouragement, etc that helps when we're feeling down.

What I understand from the pessimism you talked about before is like Schopenhauer going apeshit and telling everyone everything in life sucks, especially our most natural desires, and that we can only find temporary solace in art or something, I think that's what he says. If you look at the western canon you will see everyone from Socrates down to Schopenhauer argue for in some way or another the moral (ascetic) life. They all think our bodies and our lives are something to fight against. It gets pretty tiresome. On the other hand there have been much more cheerful literary figures and artists. I would think someone like Emerson was probably happier and lived better than Schopenhauer. Nietszsche described thought as symptom. A sick person would probably hate life, a healthy one the opposite. Not saying you are either ofc. But that explanation makes a lot of sense to me.

I'll watch that existentialist movie if you go read essay 3 of Genealogy of Morals or the non aphorism parts of Twilight of the Idols, both are pretty short. They address specifically what we're talking about and ofc better than I can ever do.


sawseech   Canada. Aug 31 2010 00:57. Posts 3182


  On August 30 2010 06:32 byrnesam wrote:
Show nested quote +



I like the affliction designs, do i automatically become a douche if i get some?


u r not mortal being u r byrnesam da rules of mortals do not apply 2 u ballitout

lets go fucking mental la la la la lets go fucking mental lets go fucking mental lala la la 

BangYu   United States. Aug 31 2010 11:04. Posts 251


  On August 30 2010 12:29 thumbz555 wrote:
Abercrombie.... dude... wow. Some epic fail you had there. I rock Express, dropped about $600 there in the last two months and got a lot of nice stuff. Express gear is fitted, so if you're in good shape buy it, if not, don't. Just my 2c



nah, they have some decent shit. I cant wear it anymore cause most of their shit has their big logo on it. Id only buy shit that didnt have their logo or a small one. I like their button up shirts also, they fit me well.


qwerty67890   New Zealand. Aug 31 2010 11:35. Posts 14026

would probably buy


mmmmmm not so much


Loco   Canada. Aug 31 2010 12:34. Posts 21022


  On August 30 2010 23:31 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Well your poker example doesn't really sound like pessimism. I would think pessimism would be like thinking you're gonna lose every time you're flipping or a favorite. What you describe seem to be just approaching poker rationally instead of emotionally, and not being results-oriented. Even from the little poker I've played compared to you I obv agree. But if what I describe is pessimism, I'm sure you can see how that's not a very good mindset to have if you wanna play your A game. Optimism in this case wouldn't really be thinking you're gonna win every flip either, although that wouldn't hurt. It would probably be a general mindset of looking at things from brighter perspective to keep your morale up. This mindset doesn't have to be irrational, but just certain stuff like encouragement, etc that helps when we're feeling down.

What I understand from the pessimism you talked about before is like Schopenhauer going apeshit and telling everyone everything in life sucks, especially our most natural desires, and that we can only find temporary solace in art or something, I think that's what he says. If you look at the western canon you will see everyone from Socrates down to Schopenhauer argue for in some way or another the moral (ascetic) life. They all think our bodies and our lives are something to fight against. It gets pretty tiresome. On the other hand there have been much more cheerful literary figures and artists. I would think someone like Emerson was probably happier and lived better than Schopenhauer. Nietszsche described thought as symptom. A sick person would probably hate life, a healthy one the opposite. Not saying you are either ofc. But that explanation makes a lot of sense to me.

I'll watch that existentialist movie if you go read essay 3 of Genealogy of Morals or the non aphorism parts of Twilight of the Idols, both are pretty short. They address specifically what we're talking about and ofc better than I can ever do.



For me it's about approaching things negatively, rather than expecting the absolute worst case scenario to occur every time. My more extreme pessimism is towards people and the general human condition rather than about events in my life, which I see as a hindrance and something to overcome. Obviously I have to disagree with you about having a mindset that forces a "brighter perspective" if that means having any unrealistic positive expectations (winning every flips? come on), because it leads to disappointments and is in my opinion a disservice and poor judgment. In practicality, cold passion resulting in equanimity is going to be the ideal condition for any poker player to be in, and in my opinion any human being as well, since he is undisturbed by outside factors and his happiness depends on himself only, and being perfectly non-results oriented would mean being in this condition. You seem to disagree, and I might be wrong but you seem to be of this opinion only because it gives the impression of the emotionless person who can no longer enjoy life, which is far from being the case and there is a whole lot I could say on that.

I'm of a similar opinion as Schopenhauer on many things including our natural desires. In fact, is not the point of Nietzsche's Ubermensch agreeing with this by saying that man is something that ought to be overcome? There is much more about Nietzsche that supports Stoic ideals than there is being dismissive, also. I have not read those texts and while N might have some interesting things to say about asceticism and Schopenhauer, it seems to me that it would be wrong to say that he holds a position anywhere near yours on the subject since he claimed that Schopenhauer was one of the few thinkers he respected, whereas you're expressing something wholly different. In that respect there is probably a better and more convincing argument out there against it. I will read those books in due time, I'm not a fan of half-studies. So far I have not been impressed with his idea of the Ubermensch, which as Cioran has put, is naive, and could only come to life from someone observing men from a distance rather than living with them, and if there has been anything close to it in reality it has been Marcus Aurelius. I am keeping my further studies of N for later, but thanks for the recs. Indeed, I can think of many more artists that most likely have had a much happier life than philosophers, which to me relates sensibly to this one Dostoevsky quote; "I swear to you gentlemen, that to be overly conscious is a sickness, a real, thorough sickness."

As for the film, if you have not had any such experiences of despair or you are not fond of existentialist literature I wouldn't bother watching, it's probably a chore to watch unless you are.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 31/08/2010 12:37

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 31 2010 18:57. Posts 1929

I don't associate being non-results oriented with being pessimistic. Like I said before I think they are different things. I actually associate being non results oriented with having a positive mindset. Not wanting to think positively because it might lead to disappointment is like saying I don't wanna take this edge in this spot because I might get coolered. Might be a bad analogy but I'm sure you take risks even though you may fail sometimes. Anyway I agree we should stop talking about life-views. They are a matter of differing experiences rather than thought/philosophy.

Responding to 2nd paragraph

- Overcoming does not mean overcoming desires, it means overcoming our present morality which N describes as Christian and life-denying. Another way to look at it is we should overcome Schopenhauer like N did. N basically held the opposite opinion as S regarding the will and desire when N diverged from S.

- I think N did admire the stoics in some ways. I will have to look again. But similar to his views on others, the relationship probably goes beyond pure admiration.

- N started moving away from Schopenhauer (S) very early in his writing career. The pessimism discussed in "The Birth of Tragedy" (his first book) already differs substantially from Schopenhauerian pessimism, which N later calls "pessimism of weakness" as opposed to the "pessimism of strength" expressed by Aeschylean and Sophoclean tragedies (Not Euripides).

To attempt to summarize TBoT very briefly; Greek tragedies allow the audience to reach beyond semblance (S concept) to experience primordial oneness (das ur-eine) through a combination of dionysiac (music)/apollonian (visuals) forces present in the art of tragedy. The result brings us closer to the horrifying truth of existence; that we are ephemeral shapes controlled by forces beyond good and evil, similar to the scenario of a child playing with sand on a beach. However the realization can also be life-enhancing. We become stronger and take on greater respect for life. N then contrasts this kind of life affirming pessimism, which is not S's life-denying kind, with scientific/socratic optimism: the attitude that rationality can conquer all, through which the power of myth and art are lost (bad).

By Human all too human (second book), N had started to distance himself explicitly from S and Wagner all the way until the end of N's career.

- My position on pessimism is part from experience part from N. I'm confident I did not misread N.

- The concept of Ubermensch itself honestly doesn't matter that much. It's basically a metaphor that embodies many recurrent N themes; importance of the agonal instinct, creating new values to replace old ones, etc. As to whether the concept is naive or not, that's not really discussable over the internet.

- That's a pretty cool and very appropriate quote. I do regard a kind of trained naivete as an admirable quality. Too much philosophy does make one sick.

- I don't hate existentialism I just hate Sartre and the dramatic stuff that comes with it. It's not a very big deal imo, we were born to create shit. Having an existential crisis is like having a walking crisis, like if one day i get really anxious about walking.

 Last edit: 31/08/2010 21:26

sawseech   Canada. Aug 31 2010 19:17. Posts 3182


  On August 31 2010 11:34 Loco wrote:
Show nested quote +



For me it's about approaching things negatively, rather than expecting the absolute worst case scenario to occur every time. My more extreme pessimism is towards people and the general human condition rather than about events in my life, which I see as a hindrance and something to overcome. Obviously I have to disagree with you about having a mindset that forces a "brighter perspective" if that means having any unrealistic positive expectations (winning every flips? come on), because it leads to disappointments and is in my opinion a disservice and poor judgment. In practicality, cold passion resulting in equanimity is going to be the ideal condition for any poker player to be in, and in my opinion any human being as well, since he is undisturbed by outside factors and his happiness depends on himself only, and being perfectly non-results oriented would mean being in this condition. You seem to disagree, and I might be wrong but you seem to be of this opinion only because it gives the impression of the emotionless person who can no longer enjoy life, which is far from being the case and there is a whole lot I could say on that.

I'm of a similar opinion as Schopenhauer on many things including our natural desires. In fact, is not the point of Nietzsche's Ubermensch agreeing with this by saying that man is something that ought to be overcome? There is much more about Nietzsche that supports Stoic ideals than there is being dismissive, also. I have not read those texts and while N might have some interesting things to say about asceticism and Schopenhauer, it seems to me that it would be wrong to say that he holds a position anywhere near yours on the subject since he claimed that Schopenhauer was one of the few thinkers he respected, whereas you're expressing something wholly different. In that respect there is probably a better and more convincing argument out there against it. I will read those books in due time, I'm not a fan of half-studies. So far I have not been impressed with his idea of the Ubermensch, which as Cioran has put, is naive, and could only come to life from someone observing men from a distance rather than living with them, and if there has been anything close to it in reality it has been Marcus Aurelius. I am keeping my further studies of N for later, but thanks for the recs. Indeed, I can think of many more artists that most likely have had a much happier life than philosophers, which to me relates sensibly to this one Dostoevsky quote; "I swear to you gentlemen, that to be overly conscious is a sickness, a real, thorough sickness."

As for the film, if you have not had any such experiences of despair or you are not fond of existentialist literature I wouldn't bother watching, it's probably a chore to watch unless you are.



i can attest to this. the only way for me to function is through the variable and imaginative use of the word fuck.

lets go fucking mental la la la la lets go fucking mental lets go fucking mental lala la la 

lebowski   Greece. Aug 31 2010 20:59. Posts 9205


  On August 31 2010 17:57 zulu_nation8 wrote:
- The concept of Ubermensch itself honestly doesn't matter that much. It's basically a metaphor that embodies many recurrent N themes; importance of the agonal instinct, creating new values to replace old ones, etc..


this.

I think it's impossible to understand most of the book if you haven't read any previous N work. In fact that's probably the only reason that copies of the book where given as gifts to German soldiers during WWI

Loco, distance from others is indeed essential for N in order to have the flourishing of exceptional people (the bridge to the Übermensch---> humanity's new and life affirming goal, after the death of god). I don't see why this sort of distance is something that should be viewed as wrong by default,as I assume that you imply here

  On August 31 2010 11:34 Loco wrote:

So far I have not been impressed with his idea of the Ubermensch, which as Cioran has put, is naive, and could only come to life from someone observing men from a distance rather than living with them, and if there has been anything close to it in reality it has been Marcus Aurelius.


I'm also curious about why Cioran found the whole theme naive

new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... 

vltava   United States. Aug 31 2010 21:36. Posts 1742

@byrnesam: Yeah, for some reason the LP one looks like teh ghey. Maybe it's because of the similarity between the shape of the fish logo and the shape of a heart. The letters look like they're in pink and light blue, too. Jeez, might as well put a big picture of Antonius with a heart around it.

tooker: there is very little money in stts.  

zulu_nation8   United States. Aug 31 2010 21:37. Posts 1929

that probably comes with like 500 pages of reading in a translated text. I don't know if N would call them ubermensches or not but there have been many geniuses recognized by N throughout his work, Goethe, Napoleon, Dostoevsky, some roman dudes I forgot the name of, I think Horace was one, and then some more obvious ones, Beethoven, Homer, Caesar etc, lots more.


Loco   Canada. Sep 01 2010 00:55. Posts 21022


  On August 31 2010 19:59 lebowski wrote:
Show nested quote +


this.

I think it's impossible to understand most of the book if you haven't read any previous N work. In fact that's probably the only reason that copies of the book where given as gifts to German soldiers during WWI

Loco, distance from others is indeed essential for N in order to have the flourishing of exceptional people (the bridge to the Übermensch---> humanity's new and life affirming goal, after the death of god). I don't see why this sort of distance is something that should be viewed as wrong by default,as I assume that you imply here

  On August 31 2010 11:34 Loco wrote:

So far I have not been impressed with his idea of the Ubermensch, which as Cioran has put, is naive, and could only come to life from someone observing men from a distance rather than living with them, and if there has been anything close to it in reality it has been Marcus Aurelius.


I'm also curious about why Cioran found the whole theme naive


He talks about it in 'The Trouble With Being Born', I have the book in French though so I will try to translate as best as I can.

"To a student who wanted to know where I was at in relation to the author of Zarathustra, I responded that I had stopped practicing it a long time ago. Why? He asked. Because I find him to be too naive...

I reproach him his enthusiasm and up to his fervor. He only destroyed ideals to replace them for others. A fake iconoclast, with sides of an adolescent, and a virginity I don't know, what innocence, inherent to his career of solitude. He has only observed men from a distance. Had he watched them from close up, never would he have been able to conceive nor laud the overman, loony vision, laughable, if not grotesque, chimeric or whimsical that could only surge from the mind of someone who hadn't had the time to grow old, to know detachment, the long serene disgust.

Much closer to me is a Marcus Aurelius. No hesitation from me between the lyricism of frenzy and the prone of acceptation: I find more solace, and even more hope, next to a weary emperor than next to a dazzling prophet. "

My favorite artist and philosopher Austin Osman Spare was of a similar opinion. He claimed that the Greek Pantheism created the greatest men, "nearest yet to the Ideal State, (whatever its drawbacks)", and that the Superman died with them.

To be clear, the Stoics believed we were social animals and we had a duty toward others, they were against distancing oneself from the world. This is why I have preferred them to Buddhists or Hindus for example. They are concerned with their own personal salvation, it is a selfish act, while the Stoics were first and foremost humanists and they would never consider that, they would be more apt to say that if there is a salvation it is through mankind. The Stoic didn't need to retreat in his monastery to practice his philosophy and work towards becoming a sage, he did it while facing adversity and smiling at whatever 'bad' things happened to him. Maximus from the movie Gladiator when being sent to his death and reciting a Marcus Aurelius saying comes to mind.

fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccountLast edit: 01/09/2010 01:37

zulu_nation8   United States. Sep 01 2010 01:49. Posts 1929

he doesnt really explain why


Baalim   Mexico. Sep 01 2010 06:38. Posts 34312


  On August 28 2010 19:27 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Show nested quote +



maybe the purpose it serves them doesn't agree with your values. Irrational isn't the right word, their purpose merely follow a different kind of rationality. That's not to say humans do shit for the fuck of it all the time, maybe someone does like fashion just for the fuck of it. But usually people do have reasons for hobbies

People sometimes buy jewelery just to look good or maybe even as an investment, etc. Just because someone views life different than you doesn't make it less right.



They dont agree with my values because most of my values are based on rationality (not indoctrinated by culture as u said previously), there is no such thing as different rationality, reason is one if this is not true then give me a reasonable explanation why people choose to wear jewelry?

And dont give me the reason of this one lonely man in burma who once had a golden ring, i mean society as a whole why do society desire jewelry by any other reason that is not to show off wealth...

Your previous argument as investment is irrational because you like to keep investments in a safe place, not carry them around increasing the chances of being stolen

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

qwerty67890   New Zealand. Sep 01 2010 07:12. Posts 14026

jewellery can hold sentimental value for the holder and is a lot less intrusive than other effects that may carry the same value.


Baalim   Mexico. Sep 01 2010 08:30. Posts 34312


  On September 01 2010 06:12 byrnesam wrote:
jewellery can hold sentimental value for the holder and is a lot less intrusive than other effects that may carry the same value.



What? im not talking about the golden ring of your dead grand grand mother, i mean what you can buy right now in Tiffany Co.

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

qwerty67890   New Zealand. Sep 01 2010 09:01. Posts 14026


  On September 01 2010 07:30 Baal wrote:
Show nested quote +



What? im not talking about the golden ring of your dead grand grand mother, i mean what you can buy right now in Tiffany Co.


The ring your great grand mother wore was once just a ring in a shop.


 



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2026. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap