NL1k: KK on 220bb - Page 2

SOMEONE GET CASPER OUTTA HERE

AHHHHHHHHHHH MIND FUCKKKKK

On September 02 2010 14:03 TimDawg wrote: SOMEONE GET CASPER OUTTA HERE AHHHHHHHHHHH MIND FUCKKKKK

ding broke ur mind, hu?

I'm no expert this high, usually had to drop down. But I think it's no point going to deep, just bet and get value, he'll make moves, call with tons of stuff ur ahead off

that's the thing, the smaller rr pre demotivates players from wanting to get cute as the result of it appearing to be a potbuild/milk/faggot shit and if you're playing the hand for outright value then you're sacrificing there too

basically applying mtt thinking patterns to a deep cash situation

sawseech, are you qualified to post here?

http://www.liquidpoker.net/poker-foru...d_before_posting_in_high_stakes!.html

On September 02 2010 18:00 sawseech wrote: basically applying mtt thinking patterns to a deep cash situation

kaaaaBOOOOOOOOOOOOM

On September 02 2010 18:33 Steal City wrote: sawseech, are you qualified to post here? http://www.liquidpoker.net/poker-foru...d_before_posting_in_high_stakes!.html

these are comments not hands and if anybody complains i will gladly stfu and go and hide in a corner and cry

are u fucking kidding me sawseech why are you postbombing high stakes

On September 02 2010 23:55 exalted wrote: are u fucking kidding me sawseech why are you postbombing high stakes

Don't wanna hijack, but his posts are at the least providing some food for discussion, which is in shorter supply these days.

On September 01 2010 13:16 AndrewSong wrote: Show nested quote + On September 01 2010 08:54 delete wrote: lol at responses. You're crushing the part of villain's range that he's happy to get it in with. bet $400 and watch him stack off with KQo. This deep I like the 4bet size pre- you want him to be calling off a decent chunk of cash. +1

If we compare the stack/pot ratio with this sizing to a more std 100bbs situation, say 3betting KK from the blinds std size is ~11bbs right? which is 1/9 of our effective 100bb stacks. Here 280 is about 1/8. So purely from the perspective of stack/pot ratio we should be just as comfortable getting stacks in here as we would be in a std 100bb deep, 3bet KK from the blinds situation.

A couple of things that separate the two situations:
1) how the difference in both players ranges between those 2 situations should affect the 4bet size (villains 3bet range will be strong and have better implied odds than in the example)
and 2) pot odds are better for the villain here than in my 100bb example, so we should size bigger

On September 03 2010 12:25 Fraser wrote: Show nested quote + On September 02 2010 23:55 exalted wrote: are u fucking kidding me sawseech why are you postbombing high stakes Don't wanna hijack, but his posts are at the least providing some food for discussion, which is in shorter supply these days.

Is that what hes doing? To me it seems more like hes giving shit to someone who plays 10 times higher than him and just being generally wrong...

On September 03 2010 13:26 EvilSky wrote: Show nested quote + On September 03 2010 12:25 Fraser wrote:   On September 02 2010 23:55 exalted wrote: are u fucking kidding me sawseech why are you postbombing high stakes Don't wanna hijack, but his posts are at the least providing some food for discussion, which is in shorter supply these days. Is that what hes doing? To me it seems more like hes giving shit to someone who plays 10 times higher than him and just being generally wrong...

Ya, not the most constructive posts you're right. Exalted is just such an arrogant hater i tend to take any side hes not on.

What do you think about the 4bet size?

if someone thinks i'm giving shit to a well respected poster who i know next to nothing about just because i put alot of content out there and am irreverent about the content then that person needs a reality check

it's a fucking poker hand i'm not kicking your fucking dog

go outside

On September 02 2010 23:55 exalted wrote: are u fucking kidding me sawseech why are you postbombing high stakes

~tHe CaLLoUt~

On September 03 2010 22:24 sawseech wrote: if someone thinks i'm giving shit to a well respected poster who i know next to nothing about just because i put alot of content out there and am irreverent about the content then that person needs a reality check

Thats exactly what it is, that somehow you feel justified not only spamming your advice but also being a dick about it by saying he lacks some understanding of the game while he plays much higher stakes than you, I think maybe you are the one who needs a reality check.

On September 03 2010 19:06 Fraser wrote: Show nested quote + On September 03 2010 13:26 EvilSky wrote:   On September 03 2010 12:25 Fraser wrote:   On September 02 2010 23:55 exalted wrote: are u fucking kidding me sawseech why are you postbombing high stakes Don't wanna hijack, but his posts are at the least providing some food for discussion, which is in shorter supply these days. Is that what hes doing? To me it seems more like hes giving shit to someone who plays 10 times higher than him and just being generally wrong... Ya, not the most constructive posts you're right. Exalted is just such an arrogant hater i tend to take any side hes not on. What do you think about the 4bet size?

I think going a bit bigger would be better but even as it is we still got plenty of room to get the money in.

So yeah, 40 posts and how many valuable ones?

Sawseech , if u wanted to get some decent points into the discussion, making 10+ posts instead of well written one seems like a bad idea.