https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 775 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 11:57

Durrr vs Antonius - Page 9

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Forum Index > Main Poker
  First 
  < 
  4 
  5 
  6 
  7 
  8 
 9 
  10 
  11 
  12 
  13 
  20 
  > 
  Last 
Fraser   Canada. Feb 25 2009 03:52. Posts 4605


  On February 23 2009 18:16 zumbii wrote:
I think Patrik's river bluff is ridiculous, the backdoor flush came - there is nothing Durrrr could have peeled the turn that won't call now. (he must have at least a set and he aint folding it with those odds)


I was thinking this too


vlseph   United States. Feb 25 2009 04:35. Posts 3026

so is PA/durr allowed to buy OUT of the challenge? i don't think i've seen anything on that yet.

i really do hope ivey picks NL

The only hands a nit balances in his range are the nuts, the second nuts, and the third nuts. 

spets1   Australia. Feb 26 2009 09:05. Posts 2179

if they want to buy out they will have to pay amount as if they lsot the challenge. - so Antonius would pay 500k, durr would pay 1500k

hola 

Muhweli   Finland. Feb 26 2009 09:17. Posts 10663


  On February 25 2009 03:35 vlseph wrote:
so is PA/durr allowed to buy OUT of the challenge? i don't think i've seen anything on that yet.

i really do hope ivey picks NL



I think it was mentioned in this thread and that the buy-out would be like $8M or sumthin', but dunno.

Floofy says: my dick is easily bigger than 90% of guys i checked it on the net | Floofy says: i im also doing movements  

Orome   Switzerland. Feb 26 2009 11:12. Posts 214

8m? that's 200 BI with the stakes they're playing, I highly doubt someone would feel so crushed they'd give up 200 BI to not have to play the other guy anymore.


Sennpu   Canada. Feb 26 2009 12:55. Posts 1960

would be nice if durrr could run any bad in this challenge so far he's luckboxing a ton of pots -_-v

then she ask me my qualities n bad qualities. so i tell her truth and she kinda laugh at me lol. then i ask her for hers and she gtg. i think it going ok. -Floofy 

looserSR   Slovakia. Feb 26 2009 13:11. Posts 95


  On February 26 2009 08:17 Muhweli wrote:
Show nested quote +



I think it was mentioned in this thread and that the buy-out would be like $8M or sumthin', but dunno.


wtf, see post above this bs, - durrr 1500 k PA 500k

 Last edit: 26/02/2009 13:11

TalentedTom    Canada. Feb 26 2009 23:51. Posts 20070

I HOPE THEY START PALYING NL

enough w/ the omaha nonsense!

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same 

terrybunny19240   United States. Feb 27 2009 00:01. Posts 13829

omaha sucks! omaha sucks! omaha sucks! omaha sucks! omaha sucks! omaha sucks!


Night[Mare]   Mexico. Mar 01 2009 15:18. Posts 599


  On February 26 2009 11:55 Sennpu wrote:
would be nice if durrr could run any bad in this challenge so far he's luckboxing a ton of pots -_-v



baal, i summon thee!

dcsscd hijo de pinos 

n0rthf4ce    United States. Mar 04 2009 19:33. Posts 8119


  On February 23 2009 18:16 zumbii wrote:
Of course he's gonna call the 3bets - this is omaha.
I think Patrik's river bluff is ridiculous, the backdoor flush came - there is nothing Durrrr could have peeled the turn that won't call now. (he must have at least a set and he aint folding it with those odds)


this is a decent analysis, but keep in mind that they both know the pot odds on the river. in this specific instance tom's plan was to call the turn then call nearly any river (5c or 4c he probably folds to a shove). tom's plan on the turn could've been to call with a set then fold any non-pairing river or to bluff the flush if patrik checks, and if that were the case patrik would've been the one winning the hand as he also takes away tom's ability to bluff by shoving. also, i'm not sure how aggressively they were playing at the time, but i'm guessing not too aggressively due to tom's turn flat w/ the nuts. this makes patrik's shove slightly better as it gives him more FE in addition to the great price hes getting on his bluff.

www.cardrunners.com 

Muhweli   Finland. Mar 04 2009 21:07. Posts 10663


  On February 26 2009 12:11 looserSR wrote:
Show nested quote +



wtf, see post above this bs, - durrr 1500 k PA 500k



lol, dumbass, that's not buyout, that's the buy-in. If either of them wants to buy OUT of the challenge, it's $8M. They can't just choose to pay it off right away, I'm kinda sure.
Then again, I don't know where this $8M number came from.

Floofy says: my dick is easily bigger than 90% of guys i checked it on the net | Floofy says: i im also doing movements  

Python817   Canada. Mar 04 2009 21:12. Posts 2733

I'm pretty sure in most cases the buyout is less than the buyin


player999   Brasil. Mar 04 2009 22:00. Posts 7978

The buyout is 1.5kk durrr, 500k opponent.
Period.

Wtf, 8kk? LOL, nonsense.

Browsing through your hand histories makes me wonder that you might not be aware these games are possibly play money. Have you ever tried to cash out? - Kapol 

vlseph   United States. Mar 05 2009 00:14. Posts 3026

it doesn't make sense to me if you can buy out for just what you're betting on.
so if say you're pa and you're getting crushed 25k hands in, you just pay durrrr 500k to stop? durrrr is likely to get it anyway, so it wouldn't be good for him (although nice) to accept it. shouldn't there be compensation with the bet + projected losses or the bet * 3-5 or something? like say PA getting crushed so he needs to pay durrrr like 1.5m to stop, and vice versa durrrr pays PA 3m if he is losing and doesn't want to continue.

also what is 1.5kk, just 1.5m? never seen someone use "kk" before thousand thousands?

The only hands a nit balances in his range are the nuts, the second nuts, and the third nuts. 

MysticJoey   Poland. Mar 05 2009 00:34. Posts 1430

lol ye it should be way bigger than the award for winning, 8m is kinda lol but.........


hkbubbletea   Canada. Mar 05 2009 01:34. Posts 1575

Maybe Muhweli got it mixed up with the total amount bet over the course of the challenge?
You probably lose less if you just decide to auto fold the rest of the hands then to pay 8 million dollars as a buyout.

Raise me and die. 

TheReason   United States. Mar 05 2009 01:42. Posts 178


  On March 04 2009 20:07 Muhweli wrote:
Show nested quote +



lol, dumbass, that's not buyout, that's the buy-in. If either of them wants to buy OUT of the challenge, it's $8M. They can't just choose to pay it off right away, I'm kinda sure.
Then again, I don't know where this $8M number came from.



no offense but if u really think the buyout could possibly be $8M i don't think he's the dumbass .....


Night[Mare]   Mexico. Mar 05 2009 10:55. Posts 599


  On March 05 2009 00:42 TheReason wrote:
Show nested quote +



no offense but if u really think the buyout could possibly be $8M i don't think he's the dumbass .....



i thought the buyout was to pay the loser's deal?

dcsscd hijo de pinos 

lachlan   Australia. Mar 06 2009 09:56. Posts 6991

yea i am also guessing the buyout is the original 500/1.5mill

full ring 

 
  First 
  < 
  4 
  5 
  6 
  7 
  8 
 9 
  10 
  11 
  12 
  13 
  20 
  > 
  Last 



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2026. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap