Durrr vs Antonius - Page 16

On May 04 2009 20:54 SpasticInk wrote: Show nested quote + On May 04 2009 17:59 Fraser wrote:   On May 04 2009 17:12 Patrocle wrote:   On May 04 2009 13:14 SpasticInk wrote:   On May 04 2009 11:06 SakiSaki wrote: bleh not even 1/3 of the hands played so far and antonius fails at multitabling, its all good for durrr. what are you talking about. Antonius is up 12 buyins. Yeah lot of hands left to play but still looks good for Antonius considering he plays this solid. And as you know, on the long run, they'll win the same amount of big pots. I know Brian Hastings did some in depth analysis of the matchup, but i still think this is a really big assumption. Yes and that analysis was based on a sample of 1400 hands.

You dont think 1400 hands is enough to make a reasonable assessment about preflop play in hu plo?

On May 06 2009 10:55 SakiSaki wrote: Show nested quote + On May 04 2009 20:54 SpasticInk wrote:   On May 04 2009 17:59 Fraser wrote:   On May 04 2009 17:12 Patrocle wrote:   On May 04 2009 13:14 SpasticInk wrote:   On May 04 2009 11:06 SakiSaki wrote: bleh not even 1/3 of the hands played so far and antonius fails at multitabling, its all good for durrr. what are you talking about. Antonius is up 12 buyins. Yeah lot of hands left to play but still looks good for Antonius considering he plays this solid. And as you know, on the long run, they'll win the same amount of big pots. I know Brian Hastings did some in depth analysis of the matchup, but i still think this is a really big assumption. Yes and that analysis was based on a sample of 1400 hands. You dont think 1400 hands is enough to make a reasonable assessment about preflop play in hu plo?

Generally people don't know too much about statistics and convergence's question.

Well it was more as a general statement, 1400 hands is not enough for a in depth analysis of certain postflop plays. So yes, I think 1400 is too little, maybe not when it comes solely to preflop-play, but certainly on later streets.

Im not neglecting the fact that PA only opened 70% of his hands on the button, but it was also early on in the matchup, and they have played like 10k hands after this, which we havent analysed.

And i'm not sure what you are implying Patrocle, since I have a pretty good grasp about statistics (degree in it as well, if that matters).

On May 06 2009 17:47 SpasticInk wrote: Well it was more as a general statement, 1400 hands is not enough for a in depth analysis of certain postflop plays. So yes, I think 1400 is too little, maybe not when it comes solely to preflop-play, but certainly on later streets. Im not neglecting the fact that PA only opened 70% of his hands on the button, but it was also early on in the matchup, and they have played like 10k hands after this, which we havent analysed. And i'm not sure what you are implying Patrocle, since I have a pretty good grasp about statistics (degree in it as well, if that matters).

oops, not the typical person I was aiming.
I'd be so happy to see the same analysis after 10 or 20k hands.

playing right now

So are they still playing or what?

On June 02 2009 15:04 ReturnOfHuHu wrote: So are they still playing or what?

On May 20 2009 02:34 Highcard wrote: playing right now

nope

On June 02 2009 15:57 player999 wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2009 15:04 ReturnOfHuHu wrote: So are they still playing or what?   On May 20 2009 02:34 Highcard wrote: playing right now

May 20 - Playing right now

June 2 - Are they still playing

This is not living up to what it was hyped up to be.

On June 02 2009 16:30 HeRoS)eNGagE wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2009 15:57 player999 wrote:   On June 02 2009 15:04 ReturnOfHuHu wrote: So are they still playing or what?   On May 20 2009 02:34 Highcard wrote: playing right now May 20 - Playing right now June 2 - Are they still playing

oooops fail

nvm mez posted it.

On June 02 2009 16:59 21drful wrote: This is not living up to what it was hyped up to be.

as soon as it was chosen 40knl (instead of 100knl) and omaha over hold em, it was alredy failing hard

looks like they wont be done before 2k10

On June 02 2009 19:57 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2009 16:59 21drful wrote: This is not living up to what it was hyped up to be. as soon as it was chosen 40knl (instead of 100knl) and omaha over hold em, it was alredy failing hard

every descion so far has been a huge fail :/

if they plyaed 100knl there was a serious chance someone d go broke

On June 02 2009 19:57 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2009 16:59 21drful wrote: This is not living up to what it was hyped up to be. as soon as it was chosen 40knl (instead of 100knl) and omaha over hold em, it was alredy failing hard

this & this

On June 02 2009 22:54 Spitfiree wrote: if they plyaed 100knl there was a serious chance someone d go broke

cos 40k PLO is laik no variance!

Looks like they're playing. Isn't the time like ungodly in the US and A? Durrr has bigger stacks so assume that he's up, but I really have no idea.

i don't see them playing

They must have quit right as you posted unusual to be playing during WSOP