1
 |
lebowski   Greece. Dec 02 2008 08:41. Posts 9205 | | |
instafold vs this villain
plus when you talk the only one that you could play mind games with is yourself,not a multitabling nit |
|
| new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
|
1
 |
Brobebrato   Bulgaria. Dec 02 2008 08:41. Posts 276 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
 |
TallyHo   Malaysia. Dec 02 2008 11:36. Posts 384 | | |
deep is tough and causes more variance, don't play deep if you can't handle it properly but I don't think it should be a big problem at nl10. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
caie   United States. Dec 02 2008 13:06. Posts 13 | | |
| | On December 02 2008 01:41 vlseph wrote:
snap mute yourself |
|
|
|
1
 |
mellen00   Belgium. Dec 02 2008 21:07. Posts 42 | | |
fold, only thing u beat is AQ against most players. just think about what his 3BET calling range is and what part of that range would shove here. from the stats u have u can gather he's probly going to play pretty tight, therefore u beat nrly nothing in his range except sometimes AQ (which this type of player just calls the flop with most of the time imo) |
|
|
1
 |
Zuries   United Kingdom. Dec 03 2008 07:29. Posts 120 | | |
Well i can't find the hand to post it here, but i called and he had KQ, i tooks his moneys
and the buyin in 10 dollars im at 17 because i won. not 25 and lost 8
i was thinking i should fold though. i thought he was on tilt because i won 7 dollars off him before
|
|
| | Last edit: 03/12/2008 07:30 |
|
|
1
 |
edzwoo   United States. Dec 03 2008 09:26. Posts 5911 | | |
You must have put some legendary tilt in him if he called a 3bet w/ KQ and stacked off that lightly. Either that or NL10 sucks way more than I thought it did. |
|
|
1
 |
4kinggenius   United Kingdom. Dec 03 2008 09:57. Posts 317 | | |
| | On December 03 2008 06:29 Zuries wrote:
Well i can't find the hand to post it here, but i called and he had KQ, i tooks his moneys
and the buyin in 10 dollars im at 17 because i won. not 25 and lost 8
i was thinking i should fold though. i thought he was on tilt because i won 7 dollars off him before
|
If you had asked me if I had Aces and then told me you had KK before I had acted I would have shoved over the top of you with complete air to rep the Aces. You had already talked yourself into the fact he had Aces which makes your call even more of a spew. |
|
| NL1K is only ever one drink away...... | Last edit: 03/12/2008 09:58 |
|
|
1
 |
Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Dec 03 2008 15:51. Posts 9634 | | |
dont really think ur ahead much of the time against a multi tabling nit here
id still shove here tho coz his line makes no sense at all but then again .. its 10nl its not supposed to make sense
if he s a total nit ur crushed tho he d only shove like that with QJ QQ JJ |
|
| | Last edit: 03/12/2008 15:53 |
|
|
1
 |
RICHI8   United States. Dec 03 2008 15:58. Posts 1341 | | |
Fold on that board. The only thing you're a head of is TT and AK and that represents a very small part of his range imo. |
|
|
1
| |
Lol once again soul ownage by girlsrvicious damn all you nits |
| |
|
|
1
 |
lebowski   Greece. Dec 03 2008 17:44. Posts 9205 | | |
KQ? so he turned his hand into a bluff??
lol |
|
| new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
|
1
|
1
 |
lebowski   Greece. Dec 03 2008 17:45. Posts 9205 | | |
multitabling nit my ass
only if he has down syndrome |
|
| new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
|
1
 |
lebowski   Greece. Dec 03 2008 17:56. Posts 9205 | | |
it seems that you frustrated him
however it's almost a two buyin shove and you didn't have something to indicate he would spazz out and do something retarded like he did (or knowledge that he overplays his hands)at the time so a fold is still a better play imo
all the rest about "he can't have a set because he would slowplay" etc are nonesense,especially for nits. They get a good hand and they play it like that,it's all they know how to do. The times when a random nit will make a brave 170 bb bluff are rare and you should treat them like that,unless you have a clear understanding that they are frustrated
| | On December 03 2008 06:29 Zuries wrote:
i thought he was on tilt because i won 7 dollars off him before
|
that's not a safe assumption to make
and if it was a read it should be on your OP |
|
| new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | Last edit: 03/12/2008 18:00 |
|
|
1
| |
he wasnt bluffing with his kq, he just hit top pair and didnt know what to do with it, other than "im not gonna fold this"
|
| |
|
|
1
 |
lebowski   Greece. Dec 03 2008 18:16. Posts 9205 | | |
| | On December 03 2008 17:12 Liquid`Drone wrote:
he wasnt bluffing with his kq, he just hit top pair and didnt know what to do with it, other than "im not gonna fold this"
|
I agree and he unknowingly turned it into a bluff when he overshoved instead of calling down |
|
| new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
|
1
 |
Zuries   United Kingdom. Dec 04 2008 14:26. Posts 120 | | | |
|
|
1
 |
Zuries   United Kingdom. Dec 04 2008 14:59. Posts 120 | | |
| | On December 03 2008 08:57 4kinggenius wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2008 06:29 Zuries wrote:
Well i can't find the hand to post it here, but i called and he had KQ, i tooks his moneys
and the buyin in 10 dollars im at 17 because i won. not 25 and lost 8
i was thinking i should fold though. i thought he was on tilt because i won 7 dollars off him before
|
If you had asked me if I had Aces and then told me you had KK before I had acted I would have shoved over the top of you with complete air to rep the Aces. You had already talked yourself into the fact he had Aces which makes your call even more of a spew.
|
i knew he didnt have aces...
|
|
|
|