I'm launching a new poker training website soon. It is currently being designed and is very close to finishing. We're looking for coaches.
About our site
I'll tell you a bit about the site. We're going to be focusing on micro/small stakes No Limit to start off with. I'm not going to try to compete with the big sites like DeucesCracked. The site is being professionally designed right now, and it looks great so far. I have a lot of experience with Internet Marketing and I'm 100% sure that I'll be able to sell this.
What will you be required to do?
You'll be required to create videos, articles and help out the site member. I'm not going to be slacking with the quality of the content, this is the most important part of our training site. I don't just want hundreds of videos of you playing. Sure, they help and we want some, but think of creating powerpoints, going through all the concepts as in-depth as possible, also reviewing hand histories for members can be a great way to teach.
How will you be paid?
There will be a flat fee per video / article. This is still being worked out but it will greatly increase as we grow. Just as I want quality content, you will be paid very well for it.
What else is in it for you?
I'll have a section for 1 on 1 coaching / sweat sessions with you. You can set your own price for this and 100% of the money will go to you.
What game types do we need coaches for?
Full Ring
6-Max
Multi-Table Tournaments
Sit n Gos
Heads Up
All low limits. I'm thinking 50-100NL and below.
So what do I do now?
Head over to Blind Aces Application and submit an application to become a coach. I'll get back to you ASAP.
I'm still working that out. At the start I'd like to keep it low so I can spend as much on advertising as possible for growth. But once we're more established I'm thinking around $150-200+ per video.
1
ShLiM United Kingdom. Sep 13 2008 01:44. Posts 940
what about members fee? any accurate price
Seat 5: patatino showed [Qd 2d] and won ($609,730) with a pair of Twos
$5 cheaper than DC/month? How do you plan on getting membership at that price..
Im only good at poker when I run good
1
Silver_nz New Zealand. Sep 13 2008 02:08. Posts 5647
mmm, might I point out that a player can get cardrunners for around $30/month, so why would they choose to learn from a bunch of no-names when they could be learning from the best players around, and cardrunners has a significant amount of microstakes content as well.
I think if you are going to pull this off some key points are going to be super low monthly fee and easy to get started eg, low signup fee / can pay via site transfer
I'm not asking for advice on how to get members. I know how I'm going to do that. I've put a lot of thought and research into this. There's no need for a super low monthly fee. There will be no signup fee. We'll have a free 3 day trial and yes I'll allow users to pay via site transfer.
What would you be expecting to be paid for videos?
4
Bigbobm United States. Sep 13 2008 03:31. Posts 5513
a flat rate for videos and a % of the site, or some other form of profit sharing. you need some sort of incentive for good quality videos, otherwise they will be shit quality.
Its time to stop thinking like a bitch and think smart like a poker player - ket
On September 13 2008 02:40 nebuer wrote:
I won't be paying for any shit quality videos. If you're not up to making high quality videos, you aren't right to work with us.
are you L!MP from aus-1? i have a feeling it's you...
well if u've done ur research u should know what the pros over at CR or DC get paid. your site should offer slightly lower wages for the coach but definitely need to include profit sharing for good coaches to join/improve and grow the site.
The Last Laugh.
1
milkman United States. Sep 13 2008 03:48. Posts 5719
% of the company is pretty standard these days, esp cuz u Obv don't have enough start up money, that's about the only encentive ppl r gonna have to wanna grind out vids for a third a buyin.
Its hard to make a easy buck legally, its impossible to make a easy buck morally.
I'm not offering a % of the company. This is obviously going to be a long-term arrangement and the payment is going to greatly increase as we grow. I've got quite a few applications from people who are already coaches. Just the fact that they're working for us means that they'll be able to charge more for their 1 on 1 coaching. That's an extra incentive.
I don't want people who are just looking to 'grind out vids'. Who is going to enjoy them or learn from them when the coach has a mindset like that when creating it?
It's up to you if you want to take the risk and work with us.
How much are the guys at DC or CR getting paid btw? Ive always wondered.
4
Bigbobm United States. Sep 13 2008 04:09. Posts 5513
i think youre missing the point.
the vids wont be "shit" but they arent going to be great. if they are signed into a long term agreement, they really have no incentive to make a really good video.
its a pretty logical concept imo. if you make a few videos that are really amazing, and the site becomes really successful partially because of these videos then you as the site owner profit a ton, while the video maker gets his flat rate. sure you might increase how much they make for future videos, but with no profit sharing incentive, there is going to be a lot less motivation to make a video of the same quality, or even better.
Its time to stop thinking like a bitch and think smart like a poker player - ket
On September 13 2008 03:09 Bigbobm wrote:
i think youre missing the point.
the vids wont be "shit" but they arent going to be great. if they are signed into a long term agreement, they really have no incentive to make a really good video.
its a pretty logical concept imo. if you make a few videos that are really amazing, and the site becomes really successful partially because of these videos then you as the site owner profit a ton, while the video maker gets his flat rate. sure you might increase how much they make for future videos, but with no profit sharing incentive, there is going to be a lot less motivation to make a video of the same quality, or even better.
I see what you're saying. How about we just say I'm undecided about the payment for now. I'll discuss this with the coaches.
4
Bigbobm United States. Sep 13 2008 05:07. Posts 5513
You might want to consider ironing out payment plans asap. I'm not saying you won't get good applicants, but as it stands I could see why a lot of qualified possible applicants - possible wobbly, would simply not even bother filling out the app.
But best of luck with your site.
Its time to stop thinking like a bitch and think smart like a poker player - ket
4
PoorUser United States. Sep 13 2008 05:41. Posts 7472
i hear that you should give up and join pokerswat...its all the rave -_-
Well you come on this site asking for people to become coaches for you and then you flat out ignore all of the advice they are giving you. You seem to have a very set and inflexible idea about how you want to do things for this business and don't appear to be willing to admit that you might have some things wrong. Also having basically no plan for pay-structure this far into the game is not satisfactory. It makes you look unorganized and unprofessional.
On September 13 2008 07:31 Bejamin1 wrote:
Well you come on this site asking for people to become coaches for you and then you flat out ignore all of the advice they are giving you. You seem to have a very set and inflexible idea about how you want to do things for this business and don't appear to be willing to admit that you might have some things wrong. Also having basically no plan for pay-structure this far into the game is not satisfactory. It makes you look unorganized and unprofessional.
Its quiet the opposite actually, a businessman who is already looking to launch his business has to have inflexible ideas. Frankly its his willingless to change the paygrade is what alarms me. The salaries arent just a random set of numbers, they have to be carefully calculated considering expected revenue, otherwise its; hello, bankruptcy.
I haven't ignored any of the advice that I've been given. Even though I hadn't asked for advice in the first place. Even if I hadn't replied to it, I am taking it all into consideration. Don't think that this is unorganized.
I'm pretty firm on providing a flat-fee right now. In the future this may change, and a salary could be introduced instead or in addition to this. But for now this is how it is.
I'm not trying to argue with anyone, and I may not be doing this perfectly, but I never claimed that I was. I'm doing this the way I think will work out best for everyone from my experience with business, and I'll be treating the coaches very well.
I've already got a number of applications and have a few people creating sample videos to see how they go.
1
Silver_nz New Zealand. Sep 13 2008 09:10. Posts 5647
most of the talented players from this site who aren't already in CR or DC are actively giving away microstakes videos for free 8D
On September 13 2008 03:09 Bigbobm wrote:
i think youre missing the point.
the vids wont be "shit" but they arent going to be great. if they are signed into a long term agreement, they really have no incentive to make a really good video.
its a pretty logical concept imo. if you make a few videos that are really amazing, and the site becomes really successful partially because of these videos then you as the site owner profit a ton, while the video maker gets his flat rate. sure you might increase how much they make for future videos, but with no profit sharing incentive, there is going to be a lot less motivation to make a video of the same quality, or even better.
Big, you realize the advice you are giving to this guy who is completely out of touch with the poker scene has actual $ value? People pay to here the obvious basics of how to run one of these coaching sites, idk why you bother to educate some random fish for free when clearly he is going to fail but presently hopes to make easy money from people like us.
To OP
LOL at saying you are 100% positive this will work, everyone who starts up a new business is positive they are going to succeed yet over 90% of them fail. I have no respect for a random who comes to respectable poker community and tries to get easy money, whether it be a scam or by some fucked up business plan.
GTFO imo
I have learned from poker that being at the table is not a grind, the grind is living and poker is how I pass the time
Thing is, anyone who is a decent winner at 600NL+ won't be doing video's that usually take around 2 hours to make on average (for me anyway) for a measly 150~200$.
So you're looking at coaches from limits like.. 200NL?
1
ShLiM United Kingdom. Sep 13 2008 09:35. Posts 940
im willing to pay about 4.99$ per month if the quality is very good (for micros obv..)
Seat 5: patatino showed [Qd 2d] and won ($609,730) with a pair of Twos
1
FrinkX United States. Sep 13 2008 10:38. Posts 7562
good time to launch a coaching site
take off just as fast as pokerzion
bitch on a pension suck my dong
1
handbanana21 United States. Sep 13 2008 10:49. Posts 3037
On September 13 2008 09:38 FrinkX wrote:
good time to launch a coaching site
TenBagger United States. Sep 13 2008 11:44. Posts 2018
Seriously, I'm not trying to be a dick here but your "expertise" in internet marketing and business is secondary to your product and its value. You can't expect to pay a tiny fraction of the going rate for a quality product and expect to get it. And without a quality product, you can't expect people to pay close to what it costs at places with the quality product.
For $150 a video, you are not going to get a quality product. You can promise the world in how the coach will grow with the site and the pay will grow, yada yada yada. That carries just about zero value to anyone with an ounce of common sense. Your whole business model is based on the premise that you can get quality content for cheap. GL on getting strangers on the internet to give you their services at way below market value so that you can profit.
1
SugoGosu Korea (South). Sep 13 2008 11:52. Posts 1793
i'll make NL2 and NL5 videos for $150 ez
Say this outloud! Why was six afraid of seven?......Because Seven Eight Nine
I can personally say that I would probably never ever make videos regularily for any coaching site for less than 1k a video or some % of profits. Educating the fish is bad for business and if I am going to do that in any larger schale I want to be rewarded handsomely for it.
if u don't know that you need to be capitalized before you actually start up i don't know what you think you're doing by trying to acquire staff and that is what ur talking about here
lets go fucking mental la la la la lets go fucking mental lets go fucking mental lala la la
On September 13 2008 12:38 vltava wrote:
I like where this is going...
boobs time!
excellent contribution
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same
1
milkman United States. Sep 13 2008 17:28. Posts 5719
On September 13 2008 03:00 nebuer wrote:
No I'm not L!MP.
I'm not offering a % of the company. This is obviously going to be a long-term arrangement and the payment is going to greatly increase as we grow. I've got quite a few applications from people who are already coaches. Just the fact that they're working for us means that they'll be able to charge more for their 1 on 1 coaching. That's an extra incentive.
I don't want people who are just looking to 'grind out vids'. Who is going to enjoy them or learn from them when the coach has a mindset like that when creating it?
It's up to you if you want to take the risk and work with us.
lol i think your forgetting that if your site has only up to nl100 vids, your only going to have up to nl100 players.. and they cant afford shit for coaching..
a cheap coaching rate for a good coach is going to run them like 2BI an hour.. not many people are gonna wanna go for that..
Its hard to make a easy buck legally, its impossible to make a easy buck morally.
On September 14 2008 01:50 nebuer wrote:
Alright, so far we have the coaches for 6max and HU.
Still looking for guys for:
SNGs
MTTs
Full Ring
can we know their names? just for the lawls
for the incredible lawls, i took 2 minutes of my precious time where i could have been making ooooooooooooh $.29 at the tables.
i'm a microstakes reg who can beat my limits, but don't have the time or patience to play tens of thousands of hands a month. i get a lot more satisfaction out of coaching. if i can earn, what for me will be a similar rate to the time put into playing, then i'd take the coaching anyday!
You come to this website looking for coaches and we just explain to you that your business plan is ridiculous. We don't think you're ridiculous just yet.. Don't pull a wobbly on us please!
On September 14 2008 05:54 Twisted wrote:
Don't pull a wobbly on us please!
hahahaha
Mig hefur alltaf langað til að vitna í sjálfan mig - Ég sjálfur
1
AndrewSong United States. Sep 14 2008 09:02. Posts 2355
On September 14 2008 05:54 nebuer wrote:
Who said I was hiring microstakes players to make videos? We're making videos FOR microstakes players.
Our 6max coaches both play NL600.
yeah i play 5000NL here n there when i'm on tilt. i must be a 5000NL player then lol.
but seriously.. ur years late on launching a instructional site. who the hell would want to subscribe to a low-limit site when they can swipe top players in the world for affordable price? C'mon. You snooze u lose.
On September 14 2008 01:50 nebuer wrote:
Alright, so far we have the coaches for 6max and HU.
Still looking for guys for:
SNGs
MTTs
Full Ring
can we know their names? just for the lawls
pcboi is one of them... he just told me...
yeah i admit im one of them. coz i was thnking since is play 10k hands a day, 1bi per 45minute video (=100usd) x 10( since 1k hands is about that) = 1000usd a day for me
On September 14 2008 06:01 Baal wrote:
nicks and sites please... so ur sayin a 600nl regular made a video for 100 bucks? lol.
probably the ones we actaully WANT making coaching videos
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same
1
Yugless United States. Sep 14 2008 23:25. Posts 7174
i think your idea is good and it's a niche that nobody has really tapped in to afaik, but you have to make your subscriptions cheap enough for micro players to afford
Baal - look is talking hah.
1
Cray0ns United States. Sep 14 2008 23:50. Posts 993
I want to tap the market on gimmick poker training vids. Stuff like Krantz and the pot_brownines vids, EM_2 drunk vid, or even tuff_fish crap - more for entertainment value than for educational value. It could be just a good player running over a table and talking trash in the commentary to parodies of all the current top pros.
As for OP's idea - he arguably could take a database of awful videos and make a boatload of cash if he's a closer like Alec Baldwin or Ben Affleck IMO.
Third prize is you're fired!
Ben affleck was the bomb in phantoms yo.
Last edit: 14/09/2008 23:54
1
vltava United States. Sep 15 2008 00:35. Posts 1742
On September 14 2008 22:50 Cray0ns wrote: or even tuff_fish
Hah! I played a $10+1 SNG with a tuff_fish on Stars last year. He admitted to being the same guy on Party when I asked.
tooker: there is very little money in stts.
1
freehatch United States. Sep 15 2008 08:49. Posts 95
On September 14 2008 22:25 Yugless wrote:
i think your idea is good and it's a niche that nobody has really tapped in to afaik, but you have to make your subscriptions cheap enough for micro players to afford
That was my first thought. I have been making about $50 a month at NL2. I certainly need to watch some coaching videos, but I don't want to give away half my earnings to do it.
TeCh)PsylO
1
SugoGosu Korea (South). Sep 15 2008 12:21. Posts 1793
grinderschool.com is the microstake site so far, it's $15 a month
Say this outloud! Why was six afraid of seven?......Because Seven Eight Nine
1
TimDawg United States. Sep 15 2008 13:45. Posts 10197
On September 14 2008 21:47 Baal wrote:
so you are one of the 600nl regulars? : )
all of his latest hands posted on LP are either 100NL or 50NL
online bob is actually a pretty smart person, not at all like the creepy fucker that sits in the sofa telling me he does nasty shit to me when im asleep - pinball
We don't have any coaches so far from LP. Them guys that said they were have nothing to do with us.
This isn't just teaching people to 'beat microstakes'. I agree it's easy as hell. It's teaching microstakes players solid fundamentals and teaching them to play well and improve.
We're focusing on 100NL and below. Not just 1c/2c stakes.
On September 15 2008 20:58 nebuer wrote:
We don't have any coaches so far from LP. Them guys that said they were have nothing to do with us.
This isn't just teaching people to 'beat microstakes'. I agree it's easy as hell. It's teaching microstakes players solid fundamentals and teaching them to play well and improve.
We're focusing on 100NL and below. Not just 1c/2c stakes.
what will u do when people unsubscribe after 2 weeks, coz they've already learnt how to beat 100nl
On September 15 2008 18:26 n0rthf4ce wrote:
why do you need an entire training site to teach people how to beat microstakes? it takes 30 minutes of reading and 2 days of practice.
im a NL600 reg... i couldnt be bothered making a trial video but here's a bit of a portfolio for you to pick from. sure i've only played 4 notable hands there in my life but thats not the point.
me having a sick read that this guy OBV has a flush
PokerStars Game #20321025836: Hold'em No Limit ($3/$6) - 2008/09/11 11:53:26 ET
Table 'Electra' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($917.30 in chips)
Seat 3: plyboy_binny ($696 in chips)
Seat 5: chrisjester ($809.90 in chips)
Seat 6: amirp111 ($306.15 in chips)
Seat 7: Leonida79 ($1179.10 in chips)
Seat 8: vaIuDe ($129 in chips)
TAIKO66 will be allowed to play after the button
chrisjester: posts small blind $3
amirp111: posts big blind $6
chrissicrazy: sits out
Showdown Leonida79: shows (a pair of Tens)
Hero : shows (three of a kind, Fives)
Hero collected $294 from pot
Summary Total pot $297 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: Hero showed and won ($294) with three of a kind, Fives
Seat 3: plyboy_binny (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: chrisjester (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: amirp111 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 7: Leonida79 showed and lost with a pair of Tens
Seat 8: vaIuDe folded before Flop (didn't bet)
this guy is a very solid regular. he was trying to trap with his limp call, but i saw straight thruogh it. well known as one of the best of this level.
i had a strong read he had a gutshot and a flush draw on the turn and decided to push for value, pretty standard really
Venjur: checks
Hero : bets $108
Venjur: calls $83.30 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($24.70) returned to Hero
River (Pot : $307.60)
Showdown Venjur: shows (high card King)
Hero : shows (a pair of Queens)
Hero collected $304.60 from pot
Summary Total pot $307.60 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: Hero showed and won ($304.60) with a pair of Queens
Seat 2: SobraoBoY folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: plyboy_binny folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: chrisjester folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: amirp111 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: Leonida79 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 8: vaIuDe (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: Venjur showed and lost with high card King
i have sick reads on sobraoboy, a lot of ppl fold here but i always know when sobrao is full of shit
PokerStars Game #20320564128: Hold'em No Limit ($3/$6) - 2008/09/11 11:25:51 ET
Table 'Electra' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($612 in chips)
Seat 2: SobraoBoY ($624.15 in chips)
Seat 3: plyboy_binny ($604.65 in chips)
Seat 4: Winnermen ($255.20 in chips)
Seat 5: chrisjester ($722 in chips)
Seat 6: amirp111 ($347.55 in chips)
Seat 7: Leonida79 ($1183.75 in chips)
Seat 9: factor1 ($555.05 in chips)
Leonida79: posts small blind $3
MitchD: is sitting out
factor1: posts big blind $6
Holecards Dealt to Hero
MitchD leaves the table
Hero : raises $12 to $18
SobraoBoY: calls $18
plyboy_binny: folds
Winnermen: folds
Pufluk4gold joins the table at seat #8
chrisjester: folds
amirp111: folds
Leonida79: folds
factor1: folds
Flop (Pot : $45.00)
Hero : bets $30
SobraoBoY: calls $30
Turn (Pot : $105.00)
Hero : bets $78
SobraoBoY: folds
Uncalled bet ($78) returned to Hero
Hero collected $102 from pot
Hero : doesn't show hand
Summary Total pot $105 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: Hero collected ($102)
Seat 2: SobraoBoY folded on the Turn
Seat 3: plyboy_binny folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: Winnermen folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: chrisjester folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: amirp111 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: Leonida79 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: factor1 (big blind) folded before Flop
Researchers used brain scans to show that when straight men looked at pictures of women in bikinis, areas of the brain that normally light up in anticipation of using tools, like spanners and screwdrivers, were activated.
n0rthf4ce United States. Sep 16 2008 13:11. Posts 8119
On September 16 2008 00:23 lachlan wrote:
im a NL600 reg... i couldnt be bothered making a trial video but here's a bit of a portfolio for you to pick from. sure i've only played 4 notable hands there in my life but thats not the point.
me having a sick read that this guy OBV has a flush
PokerStars Game #20321025836: Hold'em No Limit ($3/$6) - 2008/09/11 11:53:26 ET
Table 'Electra' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($917.30 in chips)
Seat 3: plyboy_binny ($696 in chips)
Seat 5: chrisjester ($809.90 in chips)
Seat 6: amirp111 ($306.15 in chips)
Seat 7: Leonida79 ($1179.10 in chips)
Seat 8: vaIuDe ($129 in chips)
TAIKO66 will be allowed to play after the button
chrisjester: posts small blind $3
amirp111: posts big blind $6
chrissicrazy: sits out
Showdown Leonida79: shows (a pair of Tens)
Hero : shows (three of a kind, Fives)
Hero collected $294 from pot
Summary Total pot $297 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: Hero showed and won ($294) with three of a kind, Fives
Seat 3: plyboy_binny (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: chrisjester (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: amirp111 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 7: Leonida79 showed and lost with a pair of Tens
Seat 8: vaIuDe folded before Flop (didn't bet)
this guy is a very solid regular. he was trying to trap with his limp call, but i saw straight thruogh it. well known as one of the best of this level.
i had a strong read he had a gutshot and a flush draw on the turn and decided to push for value, pretty standard really
Venjur: checks
Hero : bets $108
Venjur: calls $83.30 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($24.70) returned to Hero
River (Pot : $307.60)
Showdown Venjur: shows (high card King)
Hero : shows (a pair of Queens)
Hero collected $304.60 from pot
Summary Total pot $307.60 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: Hero showed and won ($304.60) with a pair of Queens
Seat 2: SobraoBoY folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: plyboy_binny folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: chrisjester folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: amirp111 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: Leonida79 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 8: vaIuDe (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: Venjur showed and lost with high card King
i have sick reads on sobraoboy, a lot of ppl fold here but i always know when sobrao is full of shit
PokerStars Game #20320564128: Hold'em No Limit ($3/$6) - 2008/09/11 11:25:51 ET
Table 'Electra' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($612 in chips)
Seat 2: SobraoBoY ($624.15 in chips)
Seat 3: plyboy_binny ($604.65 in chips)
Seat 4: Winnermen ($255.20 in chips)
Seat 5: chrisjester ($722 in chips)
Seat 6: amirp111 ($347.55 in chips)
Seat 7: Leonida79 ($1183.75 in chips)
Seat 9: factor1 ($555.05 in chips)
Leonida79: posts small blind $3
MitchD: is sitting out
factor1: posts big blind $6
Holecards Dealt to Hero
MitchD leaves the table
Hero : raises $12 to $18
SobraoBoY: calls $18
plyboy_binny: folds
Winnermen: folds
Pufluk4gold joins the table at seat #8
chrisjester: folds
amirp111: folds
Leonida79: folds
factor1: folds
Flop (Pot : $45.00)
Hero : bets $30
SobraoBoY: calls $30
Turn (Pot : $105.00)
Hero : bets $78
SobraoBoY: folds
Uncalled bet ($78) returned to Hero
Hero collected $102 from pot
Hero : doesn't show hand
Summary Total pot $105 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: Hero collected ($102)
Seat 2: SobraoBoY folded on the Turn
Seat 3: plyboy_binny folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: Winnermen folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: chrisjester folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: amirp111 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: Leonida79 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: factor1 (big blind) folded before Flop
make an offer and i'll get back to you.
i think u need to watch a little more sesame street, work on those reading skills :D
On September 16 2008 00:55 nebuer wrote:
Damn Lachlan! You're exactly the kind of guy we need! Amazing bluff against Sobrao!
ahahah this is so hilarious for too many reasons
1
Steal City United States. Oct 07 2008 03:15. Posts 2537
BUMPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP....
MyAIM (11:00:11 AM): yo
MyAIM (11:00:13 AM): how's the site going
ahokasr (11:00:27 AM): good.
MyAIM (11:00:31 AM): link me
MyAIM (11:00:36 AM): i wanna become a membe
MyAIM (11:00:38 AM): r
MyAIM (11:04:47 AM): LINK LINK LINK
ahokasr (11:05:00 AM): man, fuck off
ahokasr signed off at 11:05:16 AM.
ahokasr is offline and will receive your IMs when signing back in.
Contact Users: 755 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 05:13
Czech Republic. Sep 13 2008 04:04. Posts 8918
Don't pull a wobbly on us please!
(a pair of Tens)
(high card King)
,
,
,
,