CERN's New Collider - Page 8

the new ROFL thread
thanks guys

but wow no evolution talk?


obv the end of the world is happening, and Sooty knows it and is getting a 1 up on all of us

On September 10 2008 16:31 milkman wrote: fuck dont even remind me about the lightning.

for some reasons i busted out laughing
#1

i finally found a webcam link that actually works:

http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html

check it out for sure, they're doing a new test in a few mins

rofl

On September 11 2008 08:17 qu4nTum-fLuX wrote: i finally found a webcam link that actually works: http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html check it out for sure, they're doing a new test in a few mins

nice live feed... but this is so fkn boring. i've been watching it for over an hour now and still nothing. hope it starts soon.

On September 11 2008 08:17 qu4nTum-fLuX wrote: i finally found a webcam link that actually works: http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html check it out for sure, they're doing a new test in a few mins

heh

pretty sick fast

On September 11 2008 11:06 Question wrote:

hahhhAhahahaHAhahAHAHAHhaha

On September 10 2008 02:16 KwarK wrote: Show nested quote + On September 10 2008 02:00 Zorglub wrote: I dont know why you guys say if they created a black hole it would be so small it would dissapear again, since the nature of a black hole is that it sucks up matter and grows. A very small black hole could grow very big in a matter of milliseconds, just like a nuke, the black hole sucks up one atom, get more mass and can suck even more matter up even faster Firstly it'd be created in a vacuum. Secondly, Hawking radiation. It needs to gain a critical mass to suck in enough to counteract the energy lost, it won't and therefore it'll burn out.

The vacuum might slow it down but there would still be matter for the hole to absorb since there is no such thing as a perfect vacuum, and do we know exactly how big a black hole has to be to have that critical mass?

So did they do anything yet or is it still "preparation"?