1
 |
VENOM   United States. Sep 07 2008 18:41. Posts 1383 | | |

I think popo had a over pair 9's/10's, and the re-raiser flopped the nuts straight (87) or top set. He was playing it so fast obviously protecting something on this EXTRA draw heavy board. The pot had 4 people in it calling for implied odds with low/med PP's and suited connects, I really think 44 is no good here FR iMO.
|
|
| daylight keeps the shadows falling behind - Kenna / YadadaMeEn21 | Last edit: 07/09/2008 18:43 |
|
|
1
 |
wobbly_au   Australia. Sep 07 2008 19:03. Posts 6540 | | |
| | On September 07 2008 02:49 sOah wrote:
wtf wobbly aren't you meant to be a good FR player or something
this looks like a super duper standard fold |
LOL go burn away ur blinds more u fucking nit. LOL |
| |
|
|
1
 |
sOah   United Kingdom. Sep 07 2008 20:12. Posts 4527 | | |
| | On September 07 2008 18:03 wobbly_au wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 07 2008 02:49 sOah wrote:
wtf wobbly aren't you meant to be a good FR player or something
this looks like a super duper standard fold |
LOL go burn away ur blinds more u fucking nit. LOL
|
wat |
|
| not all who wander are lost | |
|
|
1
 |
sOah   United Kingdom. Sep 07 2008 20:13. Posts 4527 | | |
this wouldn't by any chance have anything to do with you thinking that I'm soah2 on Stars would it? sorry to rain on your parade but I rape that clown |
|
| not all who wander are lost | |
|
|
1
 |
ShLiM   United Kingdom. Sep 07 2008 21:25. Posts 940 | | |
FR is so ridiculously funny
folding sets OMG |
|
| Seat 5: patatino showed [Qd 2d] and won ($609,730) with a pair of Twos | |
|
|
1
 |
TalentedTom   Canada. Sep 07 2008 22:04. Posts 20070 | | |
in full ring if you play your 2 pair or draws strong, you get people to fold sets |
|
| Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | Last edit: 07/09/2008 22:05 |
|
|
1
 |
whamm!   Albania. Sep 08 2008 00:08. Posts 11625 | | | |
|
|
1
 |
PokerDoc88   Australia. Sep 08 2008 00:21. Posts 3527 | | |
this is why i don't touch fullring |
|
|
1
 |
wobbly_au   Australia. Sep 08 2008 07:02. Posts 6540 | | |
lol way to be results oriented. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
sOah   United Kingdom. Sep 08 2008 07:09. Posts 4527 | | |
| | On September 08 2008 06:02 wobbly_au wrote:
lol way to be results oriented. |
way to ignore what I said earlier
??? |
|
| not all who wander are lost | |
|
|
1
 |
whamm!   Albania. Sep 08 2008 07:30. Posts 11625 | | |
check folding flop here is bad imo. im all for folding sets in some spots but if im oop here im leading close to pot with the intention of going broke on flop or a safe turn. |
|
|
1
 |
EvilSky   Czech Republic. Sep 08 2008 08:11. Posts 8918 | | |
whamm i dunno if ur being sarcastic or what but your hand is super standard to stack off (I would call again on the turn tho) and the OP hand is a pretty easy fold .A fr nit is never raising a naked fd there, against 7cxc we are 60% and thats basically best case scenario imo. |
|
|
1
 |
Pokemyface   Australia. Sep 08 2008 08:43. Posts 762 | | |
| | On September 07 2008 03:12 EvilSky wrote:
pff easy fold, 55 is prolly breakeven here and 66 is obv a call. |
LOL, nice joke sir... |
| |
|
|
1
 |
lachlan   Australia. Sep 08 2008 08:56. Posts 6991 | | |
oi, this is a clear fold! any fr regulars here, name one hand u play the same way as the guy who raised that is beaten by 44
agree with venom
| | On September 07 2008 17:41 VENOM wrote:

I think popo had a over pair 9's/10's, and the re-raiser flopped the nuts straight (87) or top set. He was playing it so fast obviously protecting something on this EXTRA draw heavy board. The pot had 4 people in it calling for implied odds with low/med PP's and suited connects, I really think 44 is no good here FR iMO. |
|
|
| full ring | Last edit: 08/09/2008 09:00 |
|
|
1
 |
whamm!   Albania. Sep 08 2008 14:28. Posts 11625 | | |
but all the solid regs at 6max here say go broke... I r pokerBoT |
|
|
1
 |
TalentedTom   Canada. Sep 08 2008 14:52. Posts 20070 | | |
most 6-max regs were really good full ring players before they started playing 6-max... full ring is a easier game |
|
| Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
 |
TalentedTom   Canada. Sep 08 2008 14:54. Posts 20070 | | |
i dont think you realize what kind of read you need to fold a set, posting a hand with no relevant information just HH and asking if we should fold a set is really stupid |
|
| Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
 |
wobbly_au   Australia. Sep 08 2008 15:33. Posts 6540 | | |
| | On September 08 2008 13:54 TalentedTom wrote:
i dont think you realize what kind of read you need to fold a set, posting a hand with no relevant information just HH and asking if we should fold a set is really stupid |
this. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
phexac   United States. Sep 08 2008 19:23. Posts 2563 | | |
Your example has nothing in common with the situation in the OP thread....wtf |
| |
|
|
1
 |
whamm!   Albania. Sep 08 2008 20:21. Posts 11625 | | |
that was kinda a level or some sort. why so srs? lol
sorry guys for the confusion, just so happend i got a similar 44 bottomset hand, had that feeling again i was beat coz pf reg/nit raiser lead twice against ME in a multiway pot when i have position on the guy.
and what the fuck. im not the OP here, and i went broke with my set. so im not at fault imo hehe |
|
| | Last edit: 08/09/2008 20:25 |
|
|
|