Aba found multiaccounting - his statement - Page 5

lolol scum suckers have been doing this for a long time now everywhere

why so serious brian

-rekrul

you did it too rekrul

obviously i did, in the online greedy poker world one must fight fire with fire

On August 28 2008 00:38 [vital]Myth wrote: obviously i did, in the online greedy poker world one must fight fire with fire

or you could just call them pathetic faggots and take their money

jeah with a shotgun obv

On August 27 2008 23:01 [vital]Myth wrote: lolol scum suckers have been doing this for a long time now everywhere why so serious brian -rekrul

On August 28 2008 00:36 CrownRoyal wrote: you did it too rekrul

On August 28 2008 00:38 [vital]Myth wrote: obviously i did, in the online greedy poker world one must fight fire with fire

What a line of bullshit. :D

To compensate those that were hurt by my actions I am going to be donating 25,000 dollars to a charity to be determined in the future.

lolzers

So im assuming you never played a single time smurfing somebody who didnt smurf you previously did you Rekrul? if not... lol.

someone like rekruls motivation for smurfing is nothing to do with whatever youre talking baal. correct me if im wrong but rekrul smurfs to get action from people whod be too scared of the REKRUL name by reputation even many who have never even played him before themselves. on a secret account he can get action. which is the exact same reason why antonius has a long history of constantly smurfing and changing accounts over many years, not just on ftp.

On August 28 2008 09:02 Ket wrote: someone like rekruls motivation for smurfing is nothing to do with whatever youre talking baal. correct me if im wrong but rekrul smurfs to get action from people whod be too scared of the REKRUL name by reputation even many who have never even played him before themselves. on a secret account he can get action. which is the exact same reason why antonius has a long history of constantly smurfing and changing accounts over many years, not just on ftp.

i never said his motivations were the same as brian's i were saying that based on his comment: "lolol scum suckers have been doing this for a long time now everywhere", calling smurfers scum suckers, when he was confronted about him doing the same he said he battle fire with fire, meaning he smurfed smurfers, if he ever smurfed a non-smurfer that would rander a scum sucker and a hypocrite.

On August 28 2008 09:05 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On August 28 2008 09:02 Ket wrote: someone like rekruls motivation for smurfing is nothing to do with whatever youre talking baal. correct me if im wrong but rekrul smurfs to get action from people whod be too scared of the REKRUL name by reputation even many who have never even played him before themselves. on a secret account he can get action. which is the exact same reason why antonius has a long history of constantly smurfing and changing accounts over many years, not just on ftp. i never said his motivations were the same as brian's i were saying that based on his comment: "lolol scum suckers have been doing this for a long time now everywhere", calling smurfers scum suckers, when he was confronted about him doing the same he said he battle fire with fire, meaning he smurfed smurfers, if he ever smurfed a non-smurfer that would rander a scum sucker and a hypocrite.

no?

I believe this is wrong. But since this has been done many other times before I think other pros shouldn’t be pissed at all. (Like northface said that he isn’t)
This law has been broken so many times by so many people that its basically its now a law anymore.

On the other hand I believe that this is a good opportunity for Websites to use this guy as a scapegoat to bring the law back in strong action. And inject some regulations into the online poker world.

On Guy I have to say that if u have over $1bil then the laws basically dont apply to you! I think he should be allowed to do whatever da damn he wants cause he IS helping the online poker in MANY MANY ways.

I find it laughable that people draw the line at multiaccounting being OK for losing players but a form of cheating for winning ones. It's a pretty transparent way of saying "it's cheating if it could cost me some money". If you guys are trying to position the rules solely as to benefit your own wallets, at least have enough decency to admit you are being hypocrites rather than getting all high and mighty and saying cheating is wrong, especially considering how many high stakes players have used multiple accounts. What's most amusing, is that some of you at least, have deluded yourselves into believing your own arguments. There should be no double standard dictated by players who are directly served by it.

i think u guys take reks post to serious, reality is he was prolly rly rly drunk anyways and just felt like typing something.

On August 28 2008 09:24 SakiSaki wrote: Show nested quote + On August 28 2008 09:05 Baal wrote:   On August 28 2008 09:02 Ket wrote: someone like rekruls motivation for smurfing is nothing to do with whatever youre talking baal. correct me if im wrong but rekrul smurfs to get action from people whod be too scared of the REKRUL name by reputation even many who have never even played him before themselves. on a secret account he can get action. which is the exact same reason why antonius has a long history of constantly smurfing and changing accounts over many years, not just on ftp. i never said his motivations were the same as brian's i were saying that based on his comment: "lolol scum suckers have been doing this for a long time now everywhere", calling smurfers scum suckers, when he was confronted about him doing the same he said he battle fire with fire, meaning he smurfed smurfers, if he ever smurfed a non-smurfer that would rander a scum sucker and a hypocrite. no?

well tough and elaborate post, congratulations.

On August 28 2008 10:29 phexac wrote: I find it laughable that people draw the line at multiaccounting being OK for losing players but a form of cheating for winning ones. It's a pretty transparent way of saying "it's cheating if it could cost me some money". If you guys are trying to position the rules solely as to benefit your own wallets, at least have enough decency to admit you are being hypocrites rather than getting all high and mighty and saying cheating is wrong, especially considering how many high stakes players have used multiple accounts. What's most amusing, is that some of you at least, have deluded yourselves into believing your own arguments. There should be no double standard dictated by players who are directly served by it.

dont get me wrong the hs reg community know its still wrong what guy's doing and against the rules but they're just prepared to allow it because he's the fish. same reason as why nobody tells hellmuth to stfu with his disrespectful retarded antics when hes playing in cashgames, because they wanna keep him happy and keep him playing because he loses so much to them. youre trying to put a spin on it with clever wording which makes it seem terrible. it's just what happens in poker and something else poker pros do to help them get the best results

On August 28 2008 09:31 capaneo wrote: I believe this is wrong. But since this has been done many other times before I think other pros shouldn’t be pissed at all. (Like northface said that he isn’t) This law has been broken so many times by so many people that its basically its now a law anymore. On the other hand I believe that this is a good opportunity for Websites to use this guy as a scapegoat to bring the law back in strong action. And inject some regulations into the online poker world. On Guy I have to say that if u have over $1bil then the laws basically dont apply to you! I think he should be allowed to do whatever da damn he wants cause he IS helping the online poker in MANY MANY ways.

my personal opinion is exactly the same as everything here

u know how many bumhunting faggots there are that sit at hu tables all day every day and will only play vs terrible fish (that also change their IDs all the time)?

its really pathetic and no way around these idiot nitty regular fish than to smurf them and take all the bum hunted money they've earned

and the whole issue is just too much of a gray area...what about making different id's from site to site and playing against other people with the same id on every site...etc etc...it can't be controlled...

i really hated ppl that did this for a loooooooong time and never did it myself but now its past the point of return and all sorts of players do it, plus fuck the bumhunters...so fuck them all

fwiw i let my friends know so don't worry buddies

-rekrul

i've had people refuse to play rekrul id, they i come back 30 mins later with a smurf id and after 30 mins when i'm up 10 buyins they call me the luckiest fish idiot alive and vow they will play me every day of my life if i want

LOL

On August 28 2008 11:49 Ket wrote: Show nested quote + On August 28 2008 09:31 capaneo wrote: I believe this is wrong. But since this has been done many other times before I think other pros shouldn’t be pissed at all. (Like northface said that he isn’t) This law has been broken so many times by so many people that its basically its now a law anymore. On the other hand I believe that this is a good opportunity for Websites to use this guy as a scapegoat to bring the law back in strong action. And inject some regulations into the online poker world. On Guy I have to say that if u have over $1bil then the laws basically dont apply to you! I think he should be allowed to do whatever da damn he wants cause he IS helping the online poker in MANY MANY ways. my personal opinion is exactly the same as everything here

TY sir!