Fold all butAA/KK UTG to 3bet at NL100/NL200 - Page 2

On July 24 2008 23:37 [vital]Myth wrote: who the hell is that tight in 6max nobody but in theory if they are that tight then yeah sure also yeah qft @ peachy

this is the 2nd time you're talking about nits when I think someone says something reasonable and I play 28/23 or something of that nature. HOW LAGGY ARE YOU!?

If they have ONLY AA/KK, can't we setmine? I forgot the math here, but if we are really really sure they never have AK, QQ, JJ etc I think it was possible to do so..

I guess you should use the 5-10 rule, and if YOU KNOW that he will just 3bet AA/KK, I would call the 3bet a little bigger than 10% of the stack

because if you hit you'll probably stack him off

As muhweli said QQ/KK/AKs/AKo/AA is only 2.6% of all hands so unless u just have a small sample size and theyve been running hot pf 4% pf 3bet is wider than the mentioned range.

blasphemy !!!!!!

On July 25 2008 17:09 tae-g wrote: As muhweli said QQ/KK/AKs/AKo/AA is only 2.6% of all hands so unless u just have a small sample size and theyve been running hot pf 4% pf 3bet is wider than the mentioned range.

Someone with 4% 3betting range 3bets quite a bit less than that vs UTG raisers. That 4% includes when they are in blinds and OTB vs LP opens.

the peach man knows his stuff

blahblah
confidence interval
rahrahrah
4-5% > AAKKQQAKQAKAKQKQKKAKQKA

just widen limping range when utg imo. cant just keep folding qq to a random 3bet esp a reg

On July 26 2008 12:28 whamm! wrote: just widen limping range when utg imo. cant just keep folding qq to a random 3bet esp a reg

Can't remember the last time I limped UTG in 6-max.

On July 25 2008 01:49 Muhweli wrote: Lulz 4%+ 3-bet range already includes a lot more than AA/KK/AK/QQ or w/e. But I'm sure someone already said that.

obv.. 4% from every pos but assuming that number goes way down when 3betting an UTG open