terminator 4 teaser trailer

looks sick, i heard they aired this b4 the dark night so a few of u have prolly already seen it, but if not, check it out

http://io9.com/5025958/first-look-at-terminator-4s-underwater-kill+bots

Jesus fuckin christ. Hollywood cant let go of anything till they butcher it up so fuckin bad that even the original movie start to look like crap.

yeah it looks like it's going to be pretty good

sweet, T3 was kind of garbage focusing on the stupid robot's "feelings"... hope this one is better.

well, christian bale vs random nerd+arnold trying to act.
ship it!

christian bale is the only hint that this movie can be worth seeing

2 many people missed this.. BUMP! : /

not enough people died in T3, unlike the new rambo which was a bloodbath. They need to get into that hardcore kill em all mode

saw this trailer before the dark knight, looks promising

agree with all the 'T3 sucked and butchered the franchise' sentiments as well as the 'this might actually be decent because of bale'

idk about the terminator sequels beyond T2...

The themes and plot of T2 was tied up so beautifully at the end, there was no need to touch the franchise except to generate $$$. Part of the major theme was "fate doesn't exist, all that matters is what you make of your life, what you fight for", which imo meant we're supposed to sit back and think to ourselves whether or not judgment day would come. It's also challenging us to live our real lives carefully so that such a situation never occurs (doesn't have to be with terminators, it could be anything like creating an uncontrollable bio-weapon, or grey goo theory with nano-machines, it even applies today with global warming and exhausting natural resources like fossil fuels).

Unfortunately, T3 sucked. The fucking gay thing about T3 is it basically goes against that message of T2, and sends the shallow (and not true) message that judgment day was/is inevitable.

T4 will probably suck too due to the fact there's also a TV series now...The worst thing is, subsequent Terminator material will tarnish the brilliance of T2 (I don't rate T1 that highly tbh, its still better than T3 and TV show though).

Maybe T4 COULD end up being a pretty entertaining popcorn flick but I doubt it will have a significant deeper meaning like T2 did. However, most likely it will just shit all over the greatness of T2 just like T3 did.

T1 was a more serious movie than T2 imo... had some flaws only because special effects weren't as good as now but still great. T2 was already sort of a parody but nevertheless one of the most entertaining movies ever

el oh el semicolon parenthesis

T1 was a nice movie
T2 was a very good movie for the most part.
T3 was horrible bad movie

well tbh T3 was sooo bad that i am not even interested in T4 >_<

On July 20 2008 12:18 Ket wrote: agree with all the 'T3 sucked and butchered the franchise' sentiments as well as the 'this might actually be decent because of bale'

anything bale is in is just rape

OMG BALE IN IT !!!!!!!!! SHIP IT ! He's becoming my fav actor along with Jackman im such a fanboi

seriously trying to see a deeper meaning in Terminator is kind of retarded "zomg there is no faith we can change it"... seriously if we go like that we can conclude that in Back to the Future ROFL, these movies are made to enjoy actually they ban be really good but not in a deep way but in a really good direction, entretaining etc, not eveything has to be poetry in motion to be good, however T3 is cheesy predictable and trashy, the robot feelings part was scratched in T2 but in a very nice way when he suicides but in T3 is just stupid, also it has to be said the the terminator girl was pathetic, yeah she was hot (and that was one of the hooks) but what the fuck it makes no sense she is no threatening she is the least scary terminator since T1.

there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies

in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are
and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie

in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc
this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something.

in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/

they should make "Commando versus Rambo"

director: McG - Charlie's Angels and We are Marshall
writers: catwomen, primeval, and T3

looking forward to T4

On July 20 2008 22:28 TalentedTom wrote: they should make "Commando versus Rambo"

Oh come on, most boring movie ever.

You know for a fact that neither one of them would sustain ANY injuries during the entire film.

such a sick lineup of movies for 2009!!!! This will be awsome

On July 20 2008 18:45 lebowski wrote: there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something. in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/

Which is btw the only possible way for time travel (according to string theory), when u reach the point in the past reality starts as a branch of the other reality, otherwise it wouldnt make any sense if he kills ur dad you would disappear like in a movie? and everybody would forget u? lol no thats silly.

Therefore traveling in the past so the machines win its dumb because it would only create an alternate reality where the machines win but in the other one they lost... so whats the point, which bring us to question reality itself, if 2 parelel realities are equally real yet absolutely opposite they cannot be real, atleast not in our normal perception of reality... so we have to assume Terminator is a fucking action movie without any depth at all and anybody who sees depth in it is really really shallow

On July 21 2008 02:56 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On July 20 2008 18:45 lebowski wrote: there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something. in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/ Which is btw the only possible way for time travel (according to string theory), when u reach the point in the past reality starts as a branch of the other reality, otherwise it wouldnt make any sense if he kills ur dad you would disappear like in a movie? and everybody would forget u? lol no thats silly. Therefore traveling in the past so the machines win its dumb because it would only create an alternate reality where the machines win but in the other one they lost... so whats the point, which bring us to question reality itself, if 2 parelel realities are equally real yet absolutely opposite they cannot be real, atleast not in our normal perception of reality... so we have to assume Terminator is a fucking action movie without any depth at all and anybody who sees depth in it is really really shallow

lol true it would take some dumb machines to send a terminator to kill sarah connor ,it would mean they had heard nothing of chaos theory;such an action would make the future completely unpredictable and that would happen to a parallel reality anyway,not their own.

bale is one of the rarities that seems to pick good movies to play in, so it cant be as bad as T3

On July 21 2008 02:56 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On July 20 2008 18:45 lebowski wrote: there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something. in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/ Which is btw the only possible way for time travel (according to string theory), when u reach the point in the past reality starts as a branch of the other reality, otherwise it wouldnt make any sense if he kills ur dad you would disappear like in a movie? and everybody would forget u? lol no thats silly. Therefore traveling in the past so the machines win its dumb because it would only create an alternate reality where the machines win but in the other one they lost... so whats the point, which bring us to question reality itself, if 2 parelel realities are equally real yet absolutely opposite they cannot be real, atleast not in our normal perception of reality... so we have to assume Terminator is a fucking action movie without any depth at all and anybody who sees depth in it is really really shallow

WOW nothing better than Baal explaining to us how time travelling works .... THANK YOU DOCTOR BAAL FOR ENLIGHTENING US

well he is right you know

On July 20 2008 13:13 Breeze wrote: T1 was a more serious movie than T2 imo... had some flaws only because special effects weren't as good as now but still great. T2 was already sort of a parody but nevertheless one of the most entertaining movies ever

attempting to humanise the terminator by creating a bond with the boy does not make the film a farce. It's the reason that Terminator 2 is so good and not just another action movie.

On July 22 2008 06:18 Sheitan wrote: Show nested quote + On July 21 2008 02:56 Baal wrote:   On July 20 2008 18:45 lebowski wrote: there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something. in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/ Which is btw the only possible way for time travel (according to string theory), when u reach the point in the past reality starts as a branch of the other reality, otherwise it wouldnt make any sense if he kills ur dad you would disappear like in a movie? and everybody would forget u? lol no thats silly. Therefore traveling in the past so the machines win its dumb because it would only create an alternate reality where the machines win but in the other one they lost... so whats the point, which bring us to question reality itself, if 2 parelel realities are equally real yet absolutely opposite they cannot be real, atleast not in our normal perception of reality... so we have to assume Terminator is a fucking action movie without any depth at all and anybody who sees depth in it is really really shallow WOW nothing better than Baal explaining to us how time travelling works .... THANK YOU DOCTOR BAAL FOR ENLIGHTENING US

which movie is that pic from?

Are u srs cap ?

On July 22 2008 14:48 capaneo wrote: Show nested quote + On July 22 2008 06:18 Sheitan wrote:   On July 21 2008 02:56 Baal wrote:   On July 20 2008 18:45 lebowski wrote: there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something. in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/ Which is btw the only possible way for time travel (according to string theory), when u reach the point in the past reality starts as a branch of the other reality, otherwise it wouldnt make any sense if he kills ur dad you would disappear like in a movie? and everybody would forget u? lol no thats silly. Therefore traveling in the past so the machines win its dumb because it would only create an alternate reality where the machines win but in the other one they lost... so whats the point, which bring us to question reality itself, if 2 parelel realities are equally real yet absolutely opposite they cannot be real, atleast not in our normal perception of reality... so we have to assume Terminator is a fucking action movie without any depth at all and anybody who sees depth in it is really really shallow WOW nothing better than Baal explaining to us how time travelling works .... THANK YOU DOCTOR BAAL FOR ENLIGHTENING US which movie is that pic from?

LOL WAT?

On July 18 2008 16:48 capaneo wrote: Jesus fuckin christ. Hollywood cant let go of anything till they butcher it up so fuckin bad that even the original movie start to look like crap.

On July 22 2008 06:18 Sheitan wrote: Show nested quote + On July 21 2008 02:56 Baal wrote:   On July 20 2008 18:45 lebowski wrote: there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something. in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/ Which is btw the only possible way for time travel (according to string theory), when u reach the point in the past reality starts as a branch of the other reality, otherwise it wouldnt make any sense if he kills ur dad you would disappear like in a movie? and everybody would forget u? lol no thats silly. Therefore traveling in the past so the machines win its dumb because it would only create an alternate reality where the machines win but in the other one they lost... so whats the point, which bring us to question reality itself, if 2 parelel realities are equally real yet absolutely opposite they cannot be real, atleast not in our normal perception of reality... so we have to assume Terminator is a fucking action movie without any depth at all and anybody who sees depth in it is really really shallow WOW nothing better than Baal explaining to us how time travelling works .... THANK YOU DOCTOR BAAL FOR ENLIGHTENING US

Thank the Holder Berch and the super string theory not me

i dont give a fuck about the movie but bale is in it so ship that

I just hope bale doesn't use that batman voice in T4

On July 20 2008 22:44 masterfrywad wrote: director: McG - Charlie's Angels and We are Marshall writers: catwomen, primeval, and T3 looking forward to T4

half of the movies you just listed were shit.

On July 28 2008 01:15 Moffa wrote: I just hope bale doesn't use that batman voice in T4

qft

pretty sure hes being sarcastic

doesn't matter the actual movie could be a total flop (i sure hope not) but bottom line at least 60% of us are going to pay to see it in the theatres haha, i know i am, and i hope this is T1 and T2 quality, so we can all pretend T3 doesn't exist

On July 30 2008 21:55 NighTLesS wrote: doesn't matter the actual movie could be a total flop (i sure hope not) but bottom line at least 60% of us are going to pay to see it in the theatres haha, i know i am, and i hope this is T1 and T2 quality, so we can all pretend T3 doesn't exist

Sure that after T3 the director of charlies angles series would come up with a master piece for T4. Are you fuckin kidding me? This movie is gonna suck so bad Im sure Im gonna make another blog post when I see it downloaded. Thats how fuckin crappy this is gonna be.

Bump


So since Termniator 4 is out on most counrties for a while

What u think ?

I personally thought it was a semi-good movie that was much better than the really poor Terminator 3 .
However it was by far not as good and epic as Terminator 2

I liked that most of the atmosphere was rather dark.
I also liked the hints to Terminator 1 and 2 history
Well my expectations where rather high and so i think it didnt match the quality of T2

The film was okayish and much better than T3
However Terminator 2 was on a whole other level in terms of epicness
Terminator 1 was also probably a bit better than T4

T1 8/10
T2 9,5/10
T3 4/10 <--- that film was a disgrace
T4 7/10

Atmosphere wasn't dark at all imo.

Expected something like War of the Worlds (really dark atmosphere, I think that movie is underrated), but it wasn't "scary" at all.

i was really bored for the first half of the film. it just didn't have a storyline that i could give a shit about. it got better as it went on, but christian bale did my head in with his single tone of voice - SHOUTING

biggest problem w/ the movie is that there is no progession in the storyline, other than that I liked the action / actual movie in a vacuum

i thought it was ok

i hoped for more, it was kinda meh imo

twas ok, I really hope they stop making these, they wont ever be able to come close to T2 and they just ruin the whole franchise.

On June 11 2009 19:49 EvilSky wrote: twas ok, I really hope they stop making these, they wont ever be able to come close to T2 and they just ruin the whole franchise.

If they are gonna continue to make them I'd like to see the story go somewhere, someone eventually should win the war

visuals and battles were good, storyline and esp ending were facepalm-cliche and illogical.

I was hoping there would be some deep discussion of what it is to be human, and at which point does a cyborg become a robot etc