terminator 4 teaser trailer - Page 2

director: McG - Charlie's Angels and We are Marshall
writers: catwomen, primeval, and T3

looking forward to T4

On July 20 2008 22:28 TalentedTom wrote: they should make "Commando versus Rambo"

Oh come on, most boring movie ever.

You know for a fact that neither one of them would sustain ANY injuries during the entire film.

such a sick lineup of movies for 2009!!!! This will be awsome

On July 20 2008 18:45 lebowski wrote: there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something. in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/

Which is btw the only possible way for time travel (according to string theory), when u reach the point in the past reality starts as a branch of the other reality, otherwise it wouldnt make any sense if he kills ur dad you would disappear like in a movie? and everybody would forget u? lol no thats silly.

Therefore traveling in the past so the machines win its dumb because it would only create an alternate reality where the machines win but in the other one they lost... so whats the point, which bring us to question reality itself, if 2 parelel realities are equally real yet absolutely opposite they cannot be real, atleast not in our normal perception of reality... so we have to assume Terminator is a fucking action movie without any depth at all and anybody who sees depth in it is really really shallow

On July 21 2008 02:56 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On July 20 2008 18:45 lebowski wrote: there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something. in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/ Which is btw the only possible way for time travel (according to string theory), when u reach the point in the past reality starts as a branch of the other reality, otherwise it wouldnt make any sense if he kills ur dad you would disappear like in a movie? and everybody would forget u? lol no thats silly. Therefore traveling in the past so the machines win its dumb because it would only create an alternate reality where the machines win but in the other one they lost... so whats the point, which bring us to question reality itself, if 2 parelel realities are equally real yet absolutely opposite they cannot be real, atleast not in our normal perception of reality... so we have to assume Terminator is a fucking action movie without any depth at all and anybody who sees depth in it is really really shallow

lol true it would take some dumb machines to send a terminator to kill sarah connor ,it would mean they had heard nothing of chaos theory;such an action would make the future completely unpredictable and that would happen to a parallel reality anyway,not their own.

bale is one of the rarities that seems to pick good movies to play in, so it cant be as bad as T3

On July 21 2008 02:56 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On July 20 2008 18:45 lebowski wrote: there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something. in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/ Which is btw the only possible way for time travel (according to string theory), when u reach the point in the past reality starts as a branch of the other reality, otherwise it wouldnt make any sense if he kills ur dad you would disappear like in a movie? and everybody would forget u? lol no thats silly. Therefore traveling in the past so the machines win its dumb because it would only create an alternate reality where the machines win but in the other one they lost... so whats the point, which bring us to question reality itself, if 2 parelel realities are equally real yet absolutely opposite they cannot be real, atleast not in our normal perception of reality... so we have to assume Terminator is a fucking action movie without any depth at all and anybody who sees depth in it is really really shallow

WOW nothing better than Baal explaining to us how time travelling works .... THANK YOU DOCTOR BAAL FOR ENLIGHTENING US

well he is right you know

On July 20 2008 13:13 Breeze wrote: T1 was a more serious movie than T2 imo... had some flaws only because special effects weren't as good as now but still great. T2 was already sort of a parody but nevertheless one of the most entertaining movies ever

attempting to humanise the terminator by creating a bond with the boy does not make the film a farce. It's the reason that Terminator 2 is so good and not just another action movie.

On July 22 2008 06:18 Sheitan wrote: Show nested quote + On July 21 2008 02:56 Baal wrote:   On July 20 2008 18:45 lebowski wrote: there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something. in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/ Which is btw the only possible way for time travel (according to string theory), when u reach the point in the past reality starts as a branch of the other reality, otherwise it wouldnt make any sense if he kills ur dad you would disappear like in a movie? and everybody would forget u? lol no thats silly. Therefore traveling in the past so the machines win its dumb because it would only create an alternate reality where the machines win but in the other one they lost... so whats the point, which bring us to question reality itself, if 2 parelel realities are equally real yet absolutely opposite they cannot be real, atleast not in our normal perception of reality... so we have to assume Terminator is a fucking action movie without any depth at all and anybody who sees depth in it is really really shallow WOW nothing better than Baal explaining to us how time travelling works .... THANK YOU DOCTOR BAAL FOR ENLIGHTENING US

which movie is that pic from?

Are u srs cap ?

On July 22 2008 14:48 capaneo wrote: Show nested quote + On July 22 2008 06:18 Sheitan wrote:   On July 21 2008 02:56 Baal wrote:   On July 20 2008 18:45 lebowski wrote: there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something. in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/ Which is btw the only possible way for time travel (according to string theory), when u reach the point in the past reality starts as a branch of the other reality, otherwise it wouldnt make any sense if he kills ur dad you would disappear like in a movie? and everybody would forget u? lol no thats silly. Therefore traveling in the past so the machines win its dumb because it would only create an alternate reality where the machines win but in the other one they lost... so whats the point, which bring us to question reality itself, if 2 parelel realities are equally real yet absolutely opposite they cannot be real, atleast not in our normal perception of reality... so we have to assume Terminator is a fucking action movie without any depth at all and anybody who sees depth in it is really really shallow WOW nothing better than Baal explaining to us how time travelling works .... THANK YOU DOCTOR BAAL FOR ENLIGHTENING US which movie is that pic from?

LOL WAT?

On July 18 2008 16:48 capaneo wrote: Jesus fuckin christ. Hollywood cant let go of anything till they butcher it up so fuckin bad that even the original movie start to look like crap.

On July 22 2008 06:18 Sheitan wrote: Show nested quote + On July 21 2008 02:56 Baal wrote:   On July 20 2008 18:45 lebowski wrote: there's a difference in the theory of time travelling between the first two movies in the first one we get the idea that space and time create a loop and things are destined to be the way they are and no other way,sort of like the 12 monkeys movie in the second one they do change the future so it all makes no sense because now how the fuck was the protagonist born if his mother didn't fuck with his future friend etc etc this can only be explained by the "multiple realities" theory used in the back to the future sequels which pretty much sucks imo,implying that the time traveller switches between parallel universes or something. in the third one... well who gives a shit about the third one anyway :/ Which is btw the only possible way for time travel (according to string theory), when u reach the point in the past reality starts as a branch of the other reality, otherwise it wouldnt make any sense if he kills ur dad you would disappear like in a movie? and everybody would forget u? lol no thats silly. Therefore traveling in the past so the machines win its dumb because it would only create an alternate reality where the machines win but in the other one they lost... so whats the point, which bring us to question reality itself, if 2 parelel realities are equally real yet absolutely opposite they cannot be real, atleast not in our normal perception of reality... so we have to assume Terminator is a fucking action movie without any depth at all and anybody who sees depth in it is really really shallow WOW nothing better than Baal explaining to us how time travelling works .... THANK YOU DOCTOR BAAL FOR ENLIGHTENING US

Thank the Holder Berch and the super string theory not me

i dont give a fuck about the movie but bale is in it so ship that

I just hope bale doesn't use that batman voice in T4

On July 20 2008 22:44 masterfrywad wrote: director: McG - Charlie's Angels and We are Marshall writers: catwomen, primeval, and T3 looking forward to T4

half of the movies you just listed were shit.

On July 28 2008 01:15 Moffa wrote: I just hope bale doesn't use that batman voice in T4

qft

pretty sure hes being sarcastic

doesn't matter the actual movie could be a total flop (i sure hope not) but bottom line at least 60% of us are going to pay to see it in the theatres haha, i know i am, and i hope this is T1 and T2 quality, so we can all pretend T3 doesn't exist

On July 30 2008 21:55 NighTLesS wrote: doesn't matter the actual movie could be a total flop (i sure hope not) but bottom line at least 60% of us are going to pay to see it in the theatres haha, i know i am, and i hope this is T1 and T2 quality, so we can all pretend T3 doesn't exist

Sure that after T3 the director of charlies angles series would come up with a master piece for T4. Are you fuckin kidding me? This movie is gonna suck so bad Im sure Im gonna make another blog post when I see it downloaded. Thats how fuckin crappy this is gonna be.