600nl - Tough vs Lag

Villain's name has been changed to ward off googling. Flame on that all you'd like.
If you play the game you know who it really is, he's a tough (imo) LAGish type who runs in the 30/25/4 range. We have been fairly active PF with each other both in this session and in the past.

In this specific session we have not had an AIPF, but in previous ones we have had generally standard AK vs JJ, KK vs QQ etc. matchups when the $ has gone in, barring one time when he 5-bet 33 all in vs my KK.

Anyone have issues with my PF reraise size? And is this an auto shove for most of you?

Submitted by : nolan

POKERSTARS GAME #17500613137: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($3/$6) - 2008/05/17 - 18:13:43 (ET)
Table 'Rigel' 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: Fortino ($136.60 in chips)
Seat 2: FireFarterz ($315.55 in chips)
Seat 3: Festivuss ($693 in chips)
Seat 4: Hero ($646.05 in chips)
Seat 5: ThaPokaGun ($1736.15 in chips)
Seat 6: Sanborn21 ($834.35 in chips)
Festivuss: posts small blind $3
Hero : posts big blind $6

Holecards
Dealt to Hero
ThaPokaGun: raises $12 to $18
Sanborn21: folds
Fortino: calls $18
FireFarterz: calls $18
Festivuss: folds
Hero : raises $66 to $84
ThaPokaGun: raises $108 to $192
Fortino: folds
FireFarterz: folds
Hero : ???

Shove and be happy about it. No issue with your squeeze size, this is perfect if you go all in now. He is loose enough to be doing this with a ton of hands you flip with like 99-QQ and occasionally have a bluff and fold to a shove. The only hand you're in bad enough trouble to warrant folding here is AA. Even if he has KK it's prob neutral EV to go all in given all the dead money in the pot and that you have like 30% or more equity vs KK itself and more vs anything less.

this is an easy shove since your 3-bet looks VERY much like a squeeze good lags will notice this and play bac accordingly

you seem to have trouble getting AK in pf where you look incredibly squeezy....

yeah this is really ez aipf imo

joke post? =0

ez get it in sean =(

. . . . . I get this in vs DooMeR. It's teh AK, superman dat hoe

minraise/call.

just throwing out other options ^^

min5bet is pretty sexy, allows you to min5bet bluff in deeper stacked situations when you don't plan to call a shove

lol btw rikd told me a story about brad booth in a live game. he 6bet shoved on somebody with kinda deep stacks, and then put his phone on the table and took a picture of his cards (but still didn't show them to the opponent). then he slid it over to his opponent and it was a picture of AA. his opponent confusedly folded KK

the picture was fake. booth has that picture stored on his phone, so he didn't actually take it, he just opened it on his phone while pointing the camera lens at his cards

LOLLLLLLLLLLL

On May 18 2008 03:15 [vital]Myth wrote: min5bet is pretty sexy, allows you to min5bet bluff in deeper stacked situations when you don't plan to call a shove lol btw rikd told me a story about brad booth in a live game. he 6bet shoved on somebody with kinda deep stacks, and then put his phone on the table and took a picture of his cards (but still didn't show them to the opponent). then he slid it over to his opponent and it was a picture of AA. his opponent confusedly folded KK the picture was fake. booth has that picture stored on his phone, so he didn't actually take it, he just opened it on his phone while pointing the camera lens at his cards LOLLLLLLLLLLL

lol that's sick skills

On May 18 2008 03:15 [vital]Myth wrote: min5bet is pretty sexy, allows you to min5bet bluff in deeper stacked situations when you don't plan to call a shove lol btw rikd told me a story about brad booth in a live game. he 6bet shoved on somebody with kinda deep stacks, and then put his phone on the table and took a picture of his cards (but still didn't show them to the opponent). then he slid it over to his opponent and it was a picture of AA. his opponent confusedly folded KK the picture was fake. booth has that picture stored on his phone, so he didn't actually take it, he just opened it on his phone while pointing the camera lens at his cards LOLLLLLLLLLLL

christ what a psycho.

wow thats insane.

is that even legal?!!?!

ahhahahaa

OMFG so insane pwnd

Submitted by : Joe

PokerStars Game #17527553977: Hold'em No Limit ($3/$6) - 2008/05/18 - 19:49:07 (ET)
Table 'Caecilia V' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: ilmatta2 ($599.65 in chips)
Seat 2: Joeik ($594 in chips)
Seat 3: DCal Zone ($603 in chips)
Seat 4: Dixon01 ($660 in chips)
Seat 5: DaPokerGun ($606 in chips)
Seat 6: Bosna6666 ($402.20 in chips)
Joeik : posts small blind $3
DCal Zone: posts big blind $6

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Joeik
Dixon01: folds
DaPokerGun: raises $12 to $18
Bosna6666: folds
ilmatta2: calls $18
Joeik : raises $54 to $72
DCal Zone: folds
DaPokerGun: raises $126 to $198
ilmatta2: folds
Joeik : raises $396 to $594 and is all-in
DaPokerGun: calls $396

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $1,212.00)

   

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $1,212.00)

   

River (Pot : $1,212.00)

   

Showdown
Joeik : shows (a pair of Fives)
DaPokerGun: shows (two pair, Aces and Fives)
DaPokerGun collected $1209 from pot

Summary
Total pot $1212 | Rake $3
Board  
Seat 1: ilmatta2 (button) folded before Flop
Seat 2: Joeik (small blind) showed and lost with a pair of Fives
Seat 3: DCal Zone (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: Dixon01 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: DaPokerGun showed and won ($1209) with two pair, Aces and Fives
Seat 6: Bosna6666 folded before Flop (didn't bet)

He seems to have AA every hand.

Edit: Or not. About 20 minutes later I got KK in the sb, he raised from co, I reraised, he pushed, I called and won. He had AKo.

how can you possibly post this hand?

On May 18 2008 17:06 FrinkX wrote: how can you possibly post this hand?

Yeah I dont understand how this is a question

Joe,
why do you think villain's name was edited in the OP?

Nolan,
you cannot be serious?

wtf

WTF Brad is a baller

If this is the same guy I think it is [and it probably is] I have him running at 19/16/5 over 2,500 hands. Still a pretty easy 3-bet / get it in spot, though.

On May 18 2008 19:04 Pillars wrote: If this is the same guy I think it is [and it probably is] I have him running at 19/16/5 over 2,500 hands. Still a pretty easy 3-bet / get it in spot, though.

Also this

Villian is def not laggy

Edit-

shove if you love money imo

On May 18 2008 20:50 Jamie217 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2008 19:04 Pillars wrote: If this is the same guy I think it is [and it probably is] I have him running at 19/16/5 over 2,500 hands. Still a pretty easy 3-bet / get it in spot, though. Also this Villian is def not laggy

i have him at 30/25/4 over almost 2k hands . maybe i have a weird sample size from 3-4 handed tables idk.

On May 19 2008 10:38 nolan wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2008 20:50 Jamie217 wrote:   On May 18 2008 19:04 Pillars wrote: If this is the same guy I think it is [and it probably is] I have him running at 19/16/5 over 2,500 hands. Still a pretty easy 3-bet / get it in spot, though. Also this Villian is def not laggy i have him at 30/25/4 over almost 2k hands . maybe i have a weird sample size from 3-4 handed tables idk.

stop playing so much full ring imo

On May 19 2008 22:30 RaSZi wrote: I have him 19-17-4.1 over 11k hands fwiw

Im pretty sure I dont have 11k hands on anyone in my database lol

I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!