Best month so far

Such sick progress

didn't know this was possible in today's game

Dream is alive!!

lol guys, I just ran good at 1k and 600, ran a bit bad at 400. I didn't play much at all, usually I play more. My overall winrate usually hovers around 3-4bb, but the matter of fact is games between 400 and 1k in Italy are pretty much the same so you get higher winrates at 1k and 600. I was told playing nl1k in stars.it is a little harder than 200 zoom on .com. If I played on stars.com I would have a way harder time. I actually could make more money at nl100 zoom as average becuse winrate was great and it ran all the time, but it died this year when they killed SNE. I will eventually play 500 zoom anyway, I study a lot and my goal is to prove myself among the good players in the future. I'm still playing italian sites because I'm still building my bankroll but there's not much glory in beating these games to be honest.

And he's humble too!

nice, what is ur main study method? solvers?

I'm not sure how much solvers helped my game. I mostly think they made me improve on flop raises and check/raises and how to follow with turn and river aggression (which is pretty good considering people do tons of mistakes there). I try to be sound in theory and have an idea how things should look like so I can deviate when I have clues of my opponent's gameplan. I think doing work on my own with flopzilla and CREV is more beneficial towards improving in ranges interaction and solver helps a lot in understanding how frequencies should look like on certain board textures.

On September 01 2016 09:17 ClouD87 wrote: I'm not sure how much solvers helped my game. I mostly think they made me improve on flop raises and check/raises and how to follow with turn and river aggression (which is pretty good considering people do tons of mistakes there). I try to be sound in theory and have an idea how things should look like so I can deviate when I have clues of my opponent's gameplan. I think doing work on my own with flopzilla and CREV is more beneficial towards improving in ranges interaction and solver helps a lot in understanding how frequencies should look like on certain board textures.

That is quite the opposite for me. Solver's node-locking helped me refine and build a simpler strategy with lower frequency of raises on flops and taught me how to maximize my EV in future streets with different bet sizing. It's been a game changer compared to my CRev days. Are you taking advantage of the node-lock?

I do use node locking very little and I could improve upon that. I think the reason redbaron wins so much is because he raises flop a lot and people have no clue how to play against his strategy. I watched many hands and especially at 5k the russians and all high cbettors have strategies that play badly against that. I am a few levels below you though so I think the advantage of using CREV for me is much higher than it would be for you.

I so miss Italians :-( (and French)

So guys have a lot of traffic running? You seem to have a bunch of good sites, rip world pool

Congrats!

Keep up the good work.

Awesome! U have a great career in poker ahead of you

WP !!!

sweet
gj

Thanks guys.

On September 01 2016 13:26 careface_ wrote: I so miss Italians :-( (and French) So guys have a lot of traffic running? You seem to have a bunch of good sites, rip world pool

No, traffic is terrible at 400+. Tables are great though I agree.

Impressive

Good job and keep it up!

Another decent month

:D

On September 01 2016 10:16 AndrewSong wrote: Show nested quote + On September 01 2016 09:17 ClouD87 wrote: I'm not sure how much solvers helped my game. I mostly think they made me improve on flop raises and check/raises and how to follow with turn and river aggression (which is pretty good considering people do tons of mistakes there). I try to be sound in theory and have an idea how things should look like so I can deviate when I have clues of my opponent's gameplan. I think doing work on my own with flopzilla and CREV is more beneficial towards improving in ranges interaction and solver helps a lot in understanding how frequencies should look like on certain board textures. That is quite the opposite for me. Solver's node-locking helped me refine and build a simpler strategy with lower frequency of raises on flops and taught me how to maximize my EV in future streets with different bet sizing. It's been a game changer compared to my CRev days. Are you taking advantage of the node-lock?

What is Solver's node-locking if you don't mind me asking?

And what's Crev?