https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international Poland    Contact            Users: 344 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 04:46

(Some) Billionaires: Take + Hoodwink + Bamboozle.

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Forum Index > Poker Blogs
RiKD    United States. Jul 17 2015 22:56. Posts 8534
"Oh, and I say it again, you've been had. You've been took. You've been hoodwinked. Bamboozled. Led astray. Run amok!" - Malcolm X

Reasons to watch this video:

- John Olliver is fucking hilarious and shares news based in truth, fairness, and goodness.

- Billionaire owners negotiate hundreds of millions out of taxpayers to build stadiums for hundreds of millions in revenue that gets cut up 100% owner, 0% taxpayer

- Inspirational half time speeches!






0 votes
Facebook Twitter
 Last edit: 18/07/2015 21:49

Trav94   Canada. Jul 18 2015 01:14. Posts 1785

Haha the ending. On a more serious note. I 100% agree with the sentiment that tax payers shouldn't be paying for stadiums for sports teams. Fuck that.


devon06atX   Canada. Jul 18 2015 04:25. Posts 5458


  On July 18 2015 00:14 Trav94 wrote:
Haha the ending. On a more serious note. I 100% agree with the sentiment that tax payers shouldn't be paying for stadiums for sports teams. Fuck that.

But dude! Trickle down economics! Duhhh!


dogmeat   Czech Republic. Jul 18 2015 08:02. Posts 6374


  On July 18 2015 00:14 Trav94 wrote:
Haha the ending. On a more serious note. I 100% agree with the sentiment that tax payers shouldn't be paying for stadiums for sports teams. Fuck that.

right, tax payers should be paying for roads, health care, justice services, homeless ppl shelters, political parties, culture, hmpfffff, but not for stadiums, you got it

ban baal 

traxamillion   United States. Jul 18 2015 16:28. Posts 10468

I don't have a problem with municipalities paying for stadiums but if they do then the revenue commensurate with their equity should go back to the city; not the team/owner.


Liquid`Drone   Norway. Jul 18 2015 17:30. Posts 3093

100% agreed with traxamillion. I have no problems with publicly funded stadiums, but then the same group has to reap the rewards. (And then there has to be an expectation of a reward at least kinda matching the investment prior to construction.) While I am personally in the 'socialize both the risks and rewards' camp, I can at least understand the 'privatize the risk and reward' thinking. This however, is another example of the perverse socialized risk but privatized reward, and that's terrible.

lol POKER 

dnagardi   Hungary. Jul 18 2015 17:48. Posts 1776

if you want me to watch a 20min video, you gotta elaborate a bit more why.


Mariuslol   Norway. Jul 18 2015 18:16. Posts 4742

Most of that guy's shit is super solid, think I've watched all his vods, 20 min or not xD


RiKD    United States. Jul 18 2015 21:51. Posts 8534


  On July 18 2015 16:48 dnagardi wrote:
if you want me to watch a 20min video, you gotta elaborate a bit more why.



Updated OP yo.

Do you like laughing?

Do you like truth?

Do you like truth and satire and laughing?


Trav94   Canada. Jul 19 2015 09:00. Posts 1785


  On July 18 2015 07:02 dogmeat wrote:
Show nested quote +

right, tax payers should be paying for roads, health care, justice services, homeless ppl shelters, political parties, culture, hmpfffff, but not for stadiums, you got it


Because that's what I said right? You're a fucking moron sometimes


Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Jul 20 2015 22:14. Posts 9634

John Oliver has the best coverage on global problems. I don't always agree with what he says but he s mostly right and he makes you laugh so its basically a huge win


Gumster   Sweden. Jul 23 2015 19:30. Posts 2290

not that it's any less funny or true because of it, but you guys do know that he has a huge writing staff that writes all that material?

Do not push the river, it will flow by itself. - Polish proverb 

 



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap