1
 |
Smuft Canada. Jun 11 2015 20:28. Posts 633 | | |
if we XR the flop and bet the turn with the intention of bluffing the river every time, what combination of turn/river calling frequencies create a profitable bluff?
Let's look at a common BB v BTN XR scenario:
2.5x pre so 5.5bb to the flop
2.75bb cbet and XR to 10.5bb, villain calls
26.5bb to the turn, 88.5bb remaining
now the stack sizes are kind of awkward to get it all in by the river without some slight overbets but w/e we'll use the sizings commonly seen in practice
turn barrel 20bb, villain calls
66.5bb to the river, 68.5bb remaining
Pot'ish sized shove for 68.5bb
let's say villain folds 30% of the time on the turn and 50% of the time on the river, is this a profitable 0 equity bluff?
0.3(26.5) + 0.7(0.5(46.5) - 0.5(88.5))
= -6.75 (pretty sure this is right, confirmed w/ representative scenario in CREV)
So a 0 equity bluff with those conditions is not profitable, lets say our bluff has 10% equity. So we plan to shove all rivers as a bluff and lose 90% of the time when called and win 10% when called, whats our EV now?
0.3(26.5) + 0.7(0.5(46.5) + 0.5(0.1(135) - 0.9(88.5)))
= 1.0725 (not so sure about this one, the represntative scenario i came up with in CREV says 0.37... not sure if i setup the CREV scenario wrong or if this EV math is wrong)
|
|
| | Last edit: 11/06/2015 23:11 |
|
|
1
 |
Joe Czech Republic. Jun 11 2015 22:10. Posts 5987 | | |
Its 0.3725.
You have a small mistake there, when you win when called, its 115, not 135. (= 26.5 pot + 20 turn bet + 68.5 river bet)
0.3(26.5) + 0.7(0.5(46.5) + 0.5(0.1*115 - 0.9*88.5)) = 0.3725
|
|
| there is a light at the end of the tunnel... (but sometimes the tunnel is long and deep as hell) | |
|
|
1
 |
ReDDcaFFe Bulgaria. Jun 11 2015 22:20. Posts 1172 | | |
Why would you c/r half pot cb to 3x?
4x that bitch! |
|
| I cant wait to take their money | |
|
|
1
| |
if you CR to 9bb and he calls w/ 5.5 originally in the pot, the turn pot size should be 9+9+5.5=23.5 not 26.5
if you are adding 9bb to his c-bet size then it would be 2.75x2 + 9x2 + 5.5 = 29
in either case the 26.5 is incorrect |
|
| Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
|
Smuft Canada. Jun 11 2015 23:07. Posts 633 | | |
| | On June 11 2015 21:10 Joe wrote:
Its 0.3725.
You have a small mistake there, when you win when called, its 115, not 135. (= 26.5 pot + 20 turn bet + 68.5 river bet)
0.3(26.5) + 0.7(0.5(46.5) + 0.5(0.1*115 - 0.9*88.5)) = 0.3725
|
okay nice looks like that was it |
|
|
1
|
Smuft Canada. Jun 11 2015 23:11. Posts 633 | | |
ty for pointing that out as well Tom, flop XR should be to 10.5 bb instead of 9, edited to reflect that
|
|
|
1
|
Highcard Canada. Jun 12 2015 03:03. Posts 5428 | | | |
|
| I have learned from poker that being at the table is not a grind, the grind is living and poker is how I pass the time | |
|
|
1
|
Highcard Canada. Jun 12 2015 03:04. Posts 5428 | | |
wonder why I am wrong, hmm |
|
| I have learned from poker that being at the table is not a grind, the grind is living and poker is how I pass the time | |
|
|
1
|
Highcard Canada. Jun 12 2015 03:06. Posts 5428 | | | |
|
| I have learned from poker that being at the table is not a grind, the grind is living and poker is how I pass the time | |
|
|
1
|
Highcard Canada. Jun 12 2015 03:08. Posts 5428 | | |
either way, yes your 10% equity barrel off makes more money than if you check fold river 100% |
|
| I have learned from poker that being at the table is not a grind, the grind is living and poker is how I pass the time | |
|
|
1
|
Highcard Canada. Jun 12 2015 03:23. Posts 5428 | | |
0.3(26.5) + 0.7(0.5(46.5) + 0.5(0.1*115 - 0.9*88.5)) = 0.3725
I don't understand why you are winning 26.5 30% of the time he folds turn bet but only winning 46.5 50% of the 70% total frequency. Shouldn't it be 66.5 based on the semantics |
|
| I have learned from poker that being at the table is not a grind, the grind is living and poker is how I pass the time | |
|
|
1
|
Highcard Canada. Jun 12 2015 03:28. Posts 5428 | | |
either way, between giving up on turn or barreling off, I got 0.7925 profit for barreling off vs turn check and losing 100% |
|
| I have learned from poker that being at the table is not a grind, the grind is living and poker is how I pass the time | Last edit: 12/06/2015 03:30 |
|
|
1
|
Smuft Canada. Jun 12 2015 03:38. Posts 633 | | |
| | On June 12 2015 02:23 Highcard wrote:
0.3(26.5) + 0.7(0.5(46.5) + 0.5(0.1*115 - 0.9*88.5)) = 0.3725
I don't understand why you are winning 26.5 30% of the time he folds turn bet but only winning 46.5 50% of the 70% total frequency. Shouldn't it be 66.5 based on the semantics |
I think it would be 66.5 if we look at the river bet in isolation but we are looking at the EV of the turn + river bet
so we can't include the money we put into the pot in the turn as profit we gain on the river when he folds |
|
| | Last edit: 12/06/2015 03:43 |
|
|
1
|
Highcard Canada. Jun 12 2015 03:53. Posts 5428 | | |
oh right I see how you writing it |
|
| I have learned from poker that being at the table is not a grind, the grind is living and poker is how I pass the time | |
|
|
1
 |
thewh00sel  United States. Jun 12 2015 16:18. Posts 2734 | | | |
|
| A government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights: it holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force against legally disarmed victims. - Ayn Rand | |
|
|
1
|
Smuft Canada. Jun 13 2015 11:21. Posts 633 | | |
| | On June 12 2015 15:18 thewh00sel wrote:
I'd rather just have it |
your troll intuition is actually spot on
EV of betting river only when we hit:
0.3(26.5) + 0.7(0.1((0.5(115)) + 0.5(46.5)) - 0.9(20))
= 1.0025
vs 0.3725 when we bet every time
|
|
|
1
| |
Are there certain textures you use this line on? |
|
|
|
