https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international Poland    Contact            Users: 190 Active, 2 Logged in - Time: 03:35

Robotic surgical system "da Vinci" - the future?

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Forum Index > General
 1 
  2 
  > 
  Last 
  All 
Garfed   Malta. May 12 2015 12:00. Posts 4818

Been watching few videos recently about robotics and found series about "da Vinci" surgical system. Of course I knew those exist, but the videos are quite impressive - a robot stitching something as fragile as grape or folding an origami of size of a coin?





I wonder how fast those get into common use - the options of using those through internet while having the doctors a thousand kilometres away from the patient are just stunning.

Facebook Twitter

MadeInPolanD   Poland. May 12 2015 18:35. Posts 1383

JESUS IT STARTED
THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD THEIR OWN BRAIN AND KILL US ALL


SAVE YOURSELVES!

Make it rain$$$Last edit: 12/05/2015 18:35

casinocasino   Canada. May 12 2015 20:27. Posts 3343

So how does it work, is it completely automated?


locoo   Peru. May 12 2015 20:43. Posts 4561

No it's not, theres a guy doing the movements the machine is just mimicking them.

bitte bitte bitte bitte bitte bitte 

MyAnacondaDont   United States. May 12 2015 20:44. Posts 164

Have you ever thought that humans aren't the final evolution of life but maybe artificial intelligence is?

“I never did give them hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it was hell.”Last edit: 12/05/2015 20:44

Santafairy   Korea (South). May 12 2015 21:35. Posts 2224

The notion that evolution has a "final" part is a narcissistic human idea though, so AI in that case would be nothing but robotic humans

It seems to be not very profitable in the long run to play those kind of hands. - Gus Hansen 

chris   United States. May 18 2015 23:55. Posts 5503

assuming there isnt something greater at work than artificial intelligence in some form of machinery. what if the universe itself was alive, dooood.

5 minute showers are my 8 minute abs. - Neilly 

Baalim   Mexico. May 19 2015 08:07. Posts 34246


  On May 12 2015 19:44 MyAnacondaDont wrote:
Have you ever thought that humans aren't the final evolution of life but maybe artificial intelligence is?



That is almost a certainty

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

Stroggoz   New Zealand. May 19 2015 08:53. Posts 5289


  On May 12 2015 19:44 MyAnacondaDont wrote:
Have you ever thought that humans aren't the final evolution of life but maybe artificial intelligence is?



machines cannot think. They compute, and do a set of instructions. Computers are not creative, they cannot come up with proofs, theories or fall in love. They very clearly operate differently from biological systems.

computers are probably the most simple minded concepts in science behind mathematics, where as concepts like free will are infinitely complex, almost no progress has been made on those concepts since ancient Greece. AI has similar complexity, and many scientists/philosophers in that field have had embarrassingly bad predictions.

And there are some computers that can beat anyone at chess, that means very little, like all they do is follow a series of algorithms and combinatorial mathematics probably. Humans who play chess don't follow algorithms.

And there is another thing. The vast array of things that a human has to react to, a computer the size of the universe that was turned on for trillions of years could not have the computing power to mimic another human being. There is a problem in mathematics called NP=P which is an unsolved problem that deals with what can and can't be computed by computers the size of the universe. Until mathematicians give a proof for that, computers will not be very impressive in the field of AI or even mimicking human behavior.

One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beingsLast edit: 19/05/2015 09:33

dnagardi   Hungary. May 19 2015 13:11. Posts 1776


  On May 19 2015 07:07 Baalim wrote:
Show nested quote +



That is almost a certainty


considering they lack the "soul, consciousness and feelings I would say thats unlikely

it depends on what you measure it, yes they can reproduce, yes they can make billion times more tasks than a human but without the ones mentioned above, its just emptiness, not evolution


Stroggoz   New Zealand. May 19 2015 14:14. Posts 5289


  On May 19 2015 07:07 Baalim wrote:
Show nested quote +



That is almost a certainty


yeah also, its pretty bold to claim something is almost certain in artificial intelligence. It is not even close to being reduced to mathematics and scientific laws, so its very uncertain.

I certainly wouldn't label anything i say as almost certain on the topic.

One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings 

lebowski   Greece. May 21 2015 13:24. Posts 9205

computers lack "soul" or "free will"?
Humans lack these as well, not such an infinitely complex concept

btw Ex Machina is a fun movie on the subject of A.I.

new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... 

lebowski   Greece. May 21 2015 14:04. Posts 9205

people suggesting that A.I. isn't possible are in essence proposing that human or biological consciousness is something more than the bi product of evolution carving matter through countless trial and error instances to create survival machines for genes.

a)if that's exactly how we came to be, it's obvious that we could at some point carve matter ourselves in ways that could "bless" it with our existential troubles

b)if not then we are all special snowflakes of divine origin that can ignore the rest of the laws of the universe by making free, soul based decisions and obv can't be replicated

new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... 

Highcard   Canada. May 21 2015 20:33. Posts 5428


  On May 19 2015 07:53 Stroggoz wrote:
Show nested quote +



machines cannot think. They compute, and do a set of instructions. Computers are not creative, they cannot come up with proofs, theories or fall in love. They very clearly operate differently from biological systems.

computers are probably the most simple minded concepts in science behind mathematics, where as concepts like free will are infinitely complex, almost no progress has been made on those concepts since ancient Greece. AI has similar complexity, and many scientists/philosophers in that field have had embarrassingly bad predictions.

And there are some computers that can beat anyone at chess, that means very little, like all they do is follow a series of algorithms and combinatorial mathematics probably. Humans who play chess don't follow algorithms.

And there is another thing. The vast array of things that a human has to react to, a computer the size of the universe that was turned on for trillions of years could not have the computing power to mimic another human being. There is a problem in mathematics called NP=P which is an unsolved problem that deals with what can and can't be computed by computers the size of the universe. Until mathematicians give a proof for that, computers will not be very impressive in the field of AI or even mimicking human behavior.


Creativity is spontaneous ideas derived from previous stimuli, in an identical process to chemical-physical reactions. You see it in code all the time, bugs/quirks that develop over many instances, usually fucking stuff up. Or industrial assembly lines, where a flaw in the creation process results in failure rates that can be 1^100, but it happens, fucking stuff up. That same fucking up, can result in creating something useful. That happens in the large hadron collider or many developed drugs.

Falling in love is a chemical reaction that is programmed into the brain at a deeper genetic/subconscience level. A program could be setup to 'fall in love' with a certain pattern that triggers conjugation between it and x, helping achieve a common goal.

Anyways, the point is AI at it's full form will be no different than human brains, and perhaps with less limitations

That is my expectation, at least, however, not binding.

I have learned from poker that being at the table is not a grind, the grind is living and poker is how I pass the time 

Stroggoz   New Zealand. May 22 2015 14:25. Posts 5289


  On May 21 2015 13:04 lebowski wrote:
people suggesting that A.I. isn't possible are in essence proposing that human or biological consciousness is something more than the bi product of evolution carving matter through countless trial and error instances to create survival machines for genes.

a)if that's exactly how we came to be, it's obvious that we could at some point carve matter ourselves in ways that could "bless" it with our existential troubles

b)if not then we are all special snowflakes of divine origin that can ignore the rest of the laws of the universe by making free, soul based decisions and obv can't be replicated



I don't see how the negation of A implies B. If we cant recreate AI that behaves like us, then that makes us pretty ordinary, as no other animal can do it either. How does it make us special? does this imply that cats and dogs are of divine origin as well since they cannot recreate themselves? Humans happen to have biological limitations that limit us from understanding certain concepts. just like dogs and cats do, they cannot use reason.

And like i said, while brains may be carved from matter, yeah that seems true. But if they are carved in the same way that computers are, a computer the size of the universe that put out millions of operations per second on the tiniest particles, would not be able to compute what humans are capable of doing.

One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beingsLast edit: 22/05/2015 15:13

TalentedTom    Canada. May 22 2015 15:19. Posts 20070


  On May 19 2015 07:07 Baalim wrote:
Show nested quote +



That is almost a certainty


Wouldn't that suggest that every superadvanced civilization in the universe eventually becomes AI's? If we ever do make contact with an alien race it would then prob be an AI race, in which case we are 100% doomed.

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same 

LikeASet   United States. May 22 2015 17:16. Posts 2113

I've heard (not personally) from experts such as people that have worked for nasa state that all the supercomputers in the world combined couldn't replicate what goes on in a single tea spoon taken from the ocean. I think Michio Kaku stated that as of right now our current AI technology is as smart as a retarded cockroach. In order from AI on the level of at least a human to exist a lot of "If's" have to become accomplished, such as if we eventually understand how combinations of certain neuron pathways translate to emotion, information processing, being creative, etc. Another if is making quantum computing a reality so that machines have enough space to contain the hardware necessary to exert the required computing power needed from complex decision making. We'll also have groups trying to prevent advance AI technologies from coming into fruition, even people like Elon Musk describing the creation of AI like releasing a great big demon into the world.

I would think that if A.I. in machine form with god-like reasoning, problem solving, and computing power was possible it would have conquered the universe by now, assuming that A.I. would want to spread itself for the sake of gathering more information and material for ensuring its survival, and that the first possible formation of life could be 10-13 billion years ago. That would give the first spots of life a billion years to evolve into large capable organisms, plenty of time to create advanced technology, and then another 9-12 billion years to branch into outerspace! and you would think the branching out would be exponential.

I guess it just boils down to whether you're an optimist or pessimist. It's been thousands of years since we had the great philosophers, hundreds of years since our Newton, hundred years since Einstein. It's been hundreds of years and we still use the same internal combustion engine. For decades computers haven't really been changing, just getting smaller. I'd like to consider myself on optimist but I think people's view on reality is too influenced by modern science fiction.


Spitfiree   Bulgaria. May 22 2015 21:10. Posts 9634

I feel like there isn't a single human being on the planet that could make suggestions that could be even 1% close to reality on the topic of AIs being final evolution form of life and all of the results due to that, there s just too many unknowns.
And @ science fiction, usually it takes at least a century for science fiction to even get close to reality, but its far from unattainable. Tons of writers have "predicted" ( doubt it was their idea at the time ) tons of not only technical progress, but political in the means of international relations and such

 Last edit: 22/05/2015 21:12

ggplz   Sweden. May 22 2015 23:34. Posts 16784

Just remember this from the matrix!

if poker is dangerous to them i would rank sports betting as a Kodiak grizzly bear who smells blood after you just threw a javelin into his cub - RaiNKhAN 

Baalim   Mexico. May 23 2015 02:32. Posts 34246


  On May 19 2015 07:53 Stroggoz wrote:
Show nested quote +



machines cannot think. They compute, and do a set of instructions. Computers are not creative, they cannot come up with proofs, theories or fall in love. They very clearly operate differently from biological systems.

computers are probably the most simple minded concepts in science behind mathematics, where as concepts like free will are infinitely complex, almost no progress has been made on those concepts since ancient Greece. AI has similar complexity, and many scientists/philosophers in that field have had embarrassingly bad predictions.

And there are some computers that can beat anyone at chess, that means very little, like all they do is follow a series of algorithms and combinatorial mathematics probably. Humans who play chess don't follow algorithms.

And there is another thing. The vast array of things that a human has to react to, a computer the size of the universe that was turned on for trillions of years could not have the computing power to mimic another human being. There is a problem in mathematics called NP=P which is an unsolved problem that deals with what can and can't be computed by computers the size of the universe. Until mathematicians give a proof for that, computers will not be very impressive in the field of AI or even mimicking human behavior.


That is incredibly narrow-sighted, an fish cannot come up with proofs or theories or fall in love, yet it was our ancestor.

Consciousness and other properties of more complex animals dont come from some weird magic, its simply a result of a higher intelligence and as silicon brains become more advanced they will also develop consciousness, creativity etc.

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

 
 1 
  2 
  > 
  Last 
  All 



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap