Boston Marathon Explosions - Page 9

On April 21 2013 19:58 SleepyHead wrote: lol Fox news is a step up from every one of the garbage links you have posted on this forum

Fox is total garbage. If you watch that shit, I feel sorry for you.

On April 21 2013 20:00 Gnarly wrote: Show nested quote + On April 21 2013 19:58 SleepyHead wrote: lol Fox news is a step up from every one of the garbage links you have posted on this forum Fox is total garbage. If you watch that shit, I feel sorry for you.

You're not being fair to fox

On April 21 2013 20:18 TTomass wrote: Show nested quote + On April 21 2013 20:00 Gnarly wrote:   On April 21 2013 19:58 SleepyHead wrote: lol Fox news is a step up from every one of the garbage links you have posted on this forum Fox is total garbage. If you watch that shit, I feel sorry for you. You're not being fair to fox

I actually laughed at that one.

On April 21 2013 20:35 Gnarly wrote: Show nested quote + On April 21 2013 20:18 TTomass wrote:   On April 21 2013 20:00 Gnarly wrote:   On April 21 2013 19:58 SleepyHead wrote: lol Fox news is a step up from every one of the garbage links you have posted on this forum Fox is total garbage. If you watch that shit, I feel sorry for you. You're not being fair to fox I actually laughed at that one.

Who do you get the news from then?

On April 21 2013 19:22 Gnarly wrote: Show nested quote + On April 21 2013 19:04 blackjacki2 wrote:   On April 21 2013 18:12 Gnarly wrote:   On April 21 2013 17:03 blackjacki2 wrote:   On April 21 2013 14:44 Gnarly wrote:   On April 21 2013 14:27 SleepyHead wrote:   On April 21 2013 01:27 Gnarly wrote: Sleeper cell: confirmed http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-ne...bombers-fbi-hunting-12-strong-1844844 Confirmed just like the 70 dead in the Texas explosion and the giant meteor hurtling towards earth http://pastebin.com/qubb1q9y do you really believe any of those to be reliable sources? Do you really believe any media is reliable? I'm not the one saying "Confirmed" and linking to tabloids. I'm guessing you watch fox news.

Judging by your eagerness to accept the Daily Mirror as a reliable source I'm guessing that you're the one that watches Fox News.

On April 21 2013 23:00 TTomass wrote: Show nested quote + On April 21 2013 20:35 Gnarly wrote:   On April 21 2013 20:18 TTomass wrote:   On April 21 2013 20:00 Gnarly wrote:   On April 21 2013 19:58 SleepyHead wrote: lol Fox news is a step up from every one of the garbage links you have posted on this forum Fox is total garbage. If you watch that shit, I feel sorry for you. You're not being fair to fox I actually laughed at that one. Who do you get the news from then?

He gets his news from a balanced selection of sources.

I get my news from as many sources as possible. Funny to see which ones copy paste each other.

What do you think would happen if the giants reported that there was a sleeper cell in the States? Do you think it would be a good idea? Do you think people would just go about their normal every day lives? Or, do you think panic would ensue, or vigilantes going about trying to find the cell?

Reddit and twitter are already getting shit for their "witch hunt." I bet the "witches" didn't like that, the ones who weren't the bombers...

How does a man shoot himself in the throat without a gun? First, he was armed and shot at the police which initiated a shootout, now, as it seems, he was never armed in the boat.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...count-firefight-shooting-himself.html

So much for relying on big media for the truth.

Confirmed. Thanks for delivering the fair and balanced facts to us once again.

On April 25 2013 12:41 SleepyHead wrote: Confirmed. Thanks for delivering the fair and balanced facts to us once again.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/na...thon-bombing-suspect-unarmed/2111145/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/n...d18-11e2-a8b9-2a63d75b5459_story.html

http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/300195.html

http://www.wtae.com/news/national/Sus...81152/19886952/-/el9hnuz/-/index.html

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/25/...described-terror-plot-before-miranda/

http://www.lohud.com/usatoday/article/2111145

Now for the articles stating self-inflicted wound:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/22/...horities-wait-to-interrogate-suspect/

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/na...on-bombings-suspect-marathon/2100733/

http://www.lohud.com/usatoday/article/2100733

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime...jury-self-inflicted-article-1.1323323


Again, how can you shoot yourself without a gun? How can there not be a trail of blood from a gunshot wound to the neck if you shot yourself before getting to the boat?

No need for more evidence, you have already confirmed it.

We should make bets on when the actual factual story comes out and what's it gonna be .

there is so much material and pictures on internet that its quite hard to belive the official story ...

and you are pasting fox news links lool

On April 25 2013 13:56 jubei12 wrote: there is so much material and pictures on internet that its quite hard to belive the official story ... and you are pasting fox news links lool

To show why I believe that anyone who actually takes them serious is fucking retarded.

There are no facts in this movie, only dreams.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Waltham_murders

Kind of interesting.

What are you going on about Gnarly? Who gives a shit whether he was shot in the neck or not, or whether it was self-inflicted. You're acting like this trivial piece of information is leading to some grand scheme. Do you think he's innocent or something? Do you think the bombs placed were an inside job? I mean, whats your point?

On April 26 2013 09:55 NewbSaibot wrote: What are you going on about Gnarly? Who gives a shit whether he was shot in the neck or not, or whether it was self-inflicted. You're acting like this trivial piece of information is leading to some grand scheme. Do you think he's innocent or something? Do you think the bombs placed were an inside job? I mean, whats your point?

Who gives a shit that hundreds of homes were searched without a warrant, amiright? Sure, one cop may have brought two gallons of milk to a house, but still warrentless searches are against the constitution.

If he was shot through the neck, while unarmed, that means the police fucked up and they need to face the consequences, otherwise, they'll just keep doing shit like that. "Oh, you're surrendering? GET SHOT MOTHER FUCKER!" That's not trivial, because that's ILLEGAL. Unless you think the police department is above the law, but it's still ILLEGAL. It doesn't matter if he's guilty or innocent, you read the fucking miranda rights and you don't shoot up the person especially when they have surrendered. He was eventually read his miranda rights, but days after the fact.

Enemy combatant status my fucking ass.

On April 26 2013 14:29 Gnarly wrote: Show nested quote + On April 26 2013 09:55 NewbSaibot wrote: What are you going on about Gnarly? Who gives a shit whether he was shot in the neck or not, or whether it was self-inflicted. You're acting like this trivial piece of information is leading to some grand scheme. Do you think he's innocent or something? Do you think the bombs placed were an inside job? I mean, whats your point? Who gives a shit that hundreds of homes were searched without a warrant, amiright? Sure, one cop may have brought two gallons of milk to a house, but still warrentless searches are against the constitution.

>Implying anyone should give a fuck
>Implying that it wouldn't be a problem with the constitution, not with the action itself, if police couldn't search homes in this case
>Implying it shouldn't just be fruit of the poisonous tree if the police found something and everyone would be fine and not blown up by bombs

You do realize that the meme arrow is an implication, right?

>sitting at home
>enjoying muh tv and breakfast
>BANG BANG BANG on the door
>POLICE OPEN UP NOW
>shit my pants
>spill my cereal all over the place
>hesitantly open up door
>AR-15 pointed at my face
>WE NEED TO SEARCH THE PREMISES RIGHT NOW
>b-but you don't ha-
>get grabbed by officer and thrown onto my porch
>a line of officers rush into my home

Did you see some of the videos of the searches? Do you really feel comfortable with a rifle being trained on you? Who knows if you move too fast that you won't get shot... Scare an officer and you might get shot. Look at an officer wrong and you might get shot. Enemy combatant status, do you know what the means?